Active methodologies in mathematics learning
Keywords:
Active methodologies, educational process, learning environments, learning, teaching-learning processAbstract
Active methodologies are necessary in the educational process because they comprise a fundamental tool for the student to achieve an adequate level of success in their educational process. It is important to mention that the student plays a very important role, where students build their knowledge based on scenarios and activities designed by the teacher. Analyzing the impact of the implementation of Problem-Based Learning, the research is relevant because active methodologies include interactive teaching-learning processes that are based on active communication and the interconnection between teachers, students, and teaching material. Its advantages lie in the application of methods where the role in the classroom passes from the teacher to the student, who must adopt a greater degree of involvement than in more traditional or classic classes. The objective of the research is to know the impact they produce between the use of active methodology in learning mathematics in students at the basic general education level, and upper basic sublevel of the Eloy Alfaro de Chone Educational Unit, during the 2023 school year, where the inductive method was used for the investigation Development. Obtaining as a result that the application of active methodologies in curricular programs and the classroom generates cognitive, social, and motivational advantages for students, providing improvements to the educational system.
Downloads
References
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and instruction, 16(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Arteaga, B., Hernández, A., & Macías, J. (2021). Learning logical-mathematical content through popular stories in Early Childhood Education. Ocnos - Journal of Reading Studies, 20(3).
Asiú, L., Asiú, A., & Barboza, Ó. (2021). Formative evaluation in pedagogical practice: a bibliographic review. Conrado Magazine, 17(78), 134-139.
Bezanilla, M. J., Fernández-Nogueira, D., Poblete, M., & Galindo-Domínguez, H. (2019). Methodologies for teaching-learning critical thinking in higher education: The teacher’s view. Thinking skills and creativity, 33, 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100584
Bravo-Velásquez, G. M., & Reyes-Ávila, J. O. (2023). Learning styles in the teaching of mathematics. International Journal of Physics & Mathematics, 6(1), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijpm.v6n1.2219
Caicedo, L. (2019). Contribution of playful pedagogical strategies focused on play from meaningful learning. UNIMAR Magazine, 37(2), 27-38.
Caleyo, F., Gonzalez, J. L., & Hallen, J. M. (2002). A study on the reliability assessment methodology for pipelines with active corrosion defects. International journal of pressure vessels and piping, 79(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-0161(01)00124-7
Cano de la Cruz, Y., Aguiar, J., & Mendoza, M. (2019). Active methodologies: a need in the Kingdom of England Educational Unit. Education Magazine, 43(2), 2215-2644.
Castro, M., & Rivadeneira, F. (2022). Possible Causes of Poor Performance in Mathematics: A Review of the Literature. Knowledge Pole: Scientific - professional magazine, 7(2).
Castro, Y. (2022). Systematic review of university research seedbeds as a training intervention. Editorial Purposes and Representations, 10(2), 1-19.
Chávez, M., Chancay, C., Mendoza, K., & Yadira, C. (2019). Participatory techniques as a resource that enhances the teaching-learning process of English at the Technical University of Manabí. CoGnosis: Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 23-34.
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 15(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review. Thinking skills and creativity, 8, 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
Delgado, J. (2021). Scientific research: its importance in the training of researchers. Latin Science - Multidisciplinary Magazine, 5(3), 2385-2386.
Encalada, I. (2021). Learning in mathematics. Gamification as a new pedagogical tool. Horizons: Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 5(17), 311-326
Escalante, G. (2020). Involvement and communication strategies between teachers and parents: A case study. TLA-MELAUA - Magazine of Social Sciences, 175-193.
Flow, Á. (2020). Frequent errors in learning mathematics in high school. UNED Magazine, 129-141.
Friz, M., Panes, R., Salcedo, P., & Sanhueza, S. (2021). The teaching and learning process of Mathematics. Conceptions of future teachers from southern Chile. Electronic Journal of Educational Research, 20(1), 59-68.
Hossein, H. (2022). ICT and mathematics teaching in secondary school: Melilla. HUMAN Review, 3-11.
Intriago, S., & Naranjo, C. (2023). Learning mathematics in basic general education students. RECIMUNDO, 7(1), 640-653.
Juárez, M., Rasskin, I., & Mendo, S. (2019). Cooperative Learning, an active methodology for 21st century education: a bibliographic review. Prisma Social Magazine, 200–210.
Lara, K., & Schimiguel, J. (2020). Active methodologies in teaching Mathematics: state of the art. Research, Society and Development, 9(4), 1-12.
Lin, Y. G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2003). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and individual differences, 13(3), 251-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00092-4
Macías, M., & Arteaga, I. (2022). Project Based Learning, in the teaching of Mathematics for high school students of the U.E.F “Pablo Hanníbal Vela”. Polo Knowledge Magazine, 7(2), 1585-1597.
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International journal of educational research open, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
Molineros, L., & Suástegui, S. (2022). Strategy for motivating the learning of Mathematics of students studying Higher Basic Education. CoGnosis: Journal of Educational Sciences., 285-302.
Moreno P, C., & García T, M. (2010). Theory in use in mathematics teaching: a way for its reconstruction and promotion of changes. Scielo.
Nithyanandam, G. K. (2020). A framework to improve the quality of teaching-learning process-A case study. Procedia computer science, 172, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.013
Nolasco, F., & Hernández, J. (2019). Documentary study on formative evaluation as a strengthener of the teaching-learning process. Entramados Magazine - Education and society, 1-15.
Offir, B., Lev, Y., & Bezalel, R. (2008). Surface and deep learning processes in distance education: Synchronous versus asynchronous systems. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1172-1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.009
Peralta, D., & Guamán, V. (2020). Active methodologies for teaching and learning social studies. Society & amp; Technology, 3(2), 2–10.
Rocha, J. (2020). Active methodologies, the key to school change and its application in times of pandemic. Magazine of the International University of Ecuador, 33-46.
Ruiz, J., & Del Valle I, D. (2014). New technologies as tools that facilitate formative education in education. Innovative strategies for dialogic and virtual teaching, 25, p439.
Sandoval, E. (2022). Field work in social research in times of pandemic. Open Space - Venezuelan Sociology Notebook, 31(3), 10-22.
Sang, G., Valcke, M., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
Selpúveda, A., Díaz, D., & Minte, A. (2019). Poor performance in mathematics: analysis from the perspective of Chilean Basic Education students. Espacios Magazine, 40(23), 27-35.
Villalobos, J. (2022). Active Learning Methodologies and Educational Ethics. Teachers Magazine 2.0, 17(2), 47-58.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 International journal of physics & mathematics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Physics & Mathematics (IJPM) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJPM right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJPM can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
