History and literature in the Nun’s Priest’s Tale: the return of the repressed

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n2.1355

Authors

  • Mohamed Karim Dhouib Faculty of Arts and Humanities of Sousse, Tunisia

Keywords:

history, literature, noise, peasants’ revolt, repression

Abstract

Geoffrey Chaucer’s only direct reference to the consequential Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 is housed in the Nun’s Priest’s Tale as a passing, yet important, allusion to the daunting figure of Jack Straw and his men. The beast-fable’s extratemporal chronotope is indeed traversed by a brief but significantly intrusive fragment of repressed historicity. The paper argues that the discarded historical event of the revolt against the establishment surfaces in the text, not to record the cracks and crevices in the dwindling feudal system, but to participate in the bestialization and grotesquing of the 1381 insurgents and the trivialization of their rising and their cause.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aers, D. (1986). Chaucer. Atlantic Highlands.

Aers, D. (2008). Vox populi and the literature of 1381. In David Wallace (Ed.), The Cambridge history of medieval literature (pp. 432-453). Cambridge UP.

Ashton, G. (1998). Chaucer: the Canterbury Tales. Macmillan.

Astell, A. (1993). The Peasants’ Revolt: Cock-crow in Gower and Chaucer. Essays in Medieval Studies, 10, 53-64.

Barker, J. (2014). 1381: The year of the Peasants’ Revolt. Harvard UP.

Bennett, T. (1990). Outside literature. Routledge.

Bisson, L. (1998). Chaucer and the late medieval world. Macmillan.

Blamires, A. (2000). Chaucer the reactionary: Ideology and the General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales.” The Review of English Studies, 204, 523-539.

Chaucer, G. (1957). The works of Geoffrey Chaucer. (2nd ed.). F. N. Robinson. Houghton Mifflin.

Dalton, V. S., Kolshus, E., & McLoughlin, D. M. (2014). Epigenetics and depression: return of the repressed. Journal of affective disorders, 155, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.028

Dobson, R. B. (1970). The Peasants’ Revolt of 1381. Macmillan.

Du Boulay, F. (1974). The Historical Chaucer. In Drerek Brewer (Ed.), Geoffrey Chaucer: Writers and their Background (pp. 33-57). G. Bell.

Fehrenbacher, R. (1994). “A Yeerd Enclosed al aboute”: Literature and history in the Nun’s Priest’s Tale. The Chaucer Review, 2, 134-148.

Froissart, J. (1970). The rebels in London according to Froissart. In R. B. Dobson (Ed.), The Peasants’ Revolt of 138 (pp. 187-198). Macmillan.

Gower, J. (1962). The major Latin works of John Gower. E. Stockton (Ed.). Washington UP.

Greenblatt, S. (1988). Shakespearean negotiations: The circulation of social energy in Renaissance England. California UP.

Hilton, R. (2004). Bond men made free: Medieval peasant movements and the English rising of 1381. Routledge.

Jameson, F. (1983). The political unconscious: narrative as a socially symbolic act. Routledge.

Justice, S. (1994). Writing and rebellion: England in 1381. California UP.

Knight, S. (1986). Geoffrey Chaucer. Basil Blackwell.

Knighton, H. (1970). The rebels in London according to Thomas Walsingham. In R. B. Dobson (Ed.), The Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 (pp. 181-187). Macmillan.

Knighton, H. (1970). The Suppression of the Revolt according to Henry Knighton. In R. B. Dobson (Ed.), The Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 (pp. 313-314). Macmillan.

McNair, B., & Attwood, F. (2009). From porno-chic to porno-fear: The return of the repressed. In Mainstreaming Sex: The Sexualisation of Western Culture (pp. 110-130).

Patterson, L. (Ed.). (2007). Geoffrey Chaucer’s the Canterbury Tales: A casebook. Oxford: Oxford UP.

Pearsall, D. (1992). The life of Geoffrey Chaucer: A critical biography. Blackwell Publishers.

Pearsall, D. (2007). A rereading of the Nun’s Priest’s Tale. In Lee Patterson (Ed.), Geoffrey Chaucer’s the Canterbury Tales: A casebook (pp. 211-219). Oxford UP.

Rigby, S. H. (2014). Reading Chaucer: literature, history and ideology.” In Stephen H. Rigby (Ed.), Historians on Chaucer: The “General Prologue” to the Canterbury Tales (pp. 1-23). Oxford UP.

Saul, N. (1992). Chaucer and gentility. In Barbara Hanawalt (Ed.), Chaucer’s England: Literature in historical context (pp. 41-45). Minnesota UP.

Scanlon, L. (1989). The authority of fable: Allegory and irony in the Nun's Priest's Tale. Exemplaria 1: 43-68.

Staub, A. (2007). The return of the repressed: Abandoned parses facilitate syntactic reanalysis. Journal of memory and language, 57(2), 299-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.001

Strohm, P. (1989). Social Chaucer. Harvard UP.

Travis, P. (2010). Disseminal Chaucer: Rereading the Nun’s Priest’s Tale. University of Notre Dame.

Walsigham, T. (1970). The suppression of the Revolt according to Henry Knighton. In R. B. Dobson (Ed.), The Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 (pp. 306-313). Macmillan.

West, R. (2000). Chaucer 1340-1400: The life and times of the first English poet. Diane Pub Co.

White, H. (2014). The practical past. Northwestern University Press.

Published

2021-02-22

How to Cite

Dhouib, M. K. (2021). History and literature in the Nun’s Priest’s Tale: the return of the repressed. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(2), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n2.1355

Issue

Section

Research Articles