Satir et al.’s Personal Iceberg Metaphor in Malcolm & Marie: Finding Self-Understanding and Personal Development
Keywords:Personal iceberg metaphor, intimate relationship, coping, personal development, self
This study intends to use Satir et al.’s personal iceberg metaphor as a framework to uncover hidden messages in the texts of Malcolm & Marie and to explore the unexpressed inner self of Marie, who is in the midst of an argument with her lover, Malcolm. In order to reach this goal, the study uses latent-content analysis as a research technique, based on Satir et al.’s Personal Iceberg Metaphor model—behavior, coping, feelings, feelings about feelings, perceptions, expectations, yearnings, and self—as a framework to analyze the texts from the film Malcolm & Marie to realize how these metaphors can help characters, especially Marie, to reach self-understanding and personal development. When encountering the deeper layers of her personal experiences and after an exploration of these layers, Marie becomes better able to listen to her own hidden messages, realize what she yearns for, and hence, find her true self.
Banmen, J. (2002). The Satir model: Yesterday and today. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 24(1), 7–22.
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursing Plus Open, 2, 8–14.
Brehm, S. S., Miller, R. S., Perlman, D., & Campbell, S. M. (2002). Intimate Relationships. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Cookson, L. J. (2015). Differences between feelings, emotions and desires in terms of interactive quality. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2(7))108-119.
Lee, C. J. (2021). Satir’s Dialogue Practice. Taipei, Taiwan: CommonWealth Education Media and Publishing.
Das, K. K. (2018). A Study on evolutionary perspectives ?of ‘Emotions’ and ‘Mood’ on biological evolutionary ?platform. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 7 (5), 89–96.?
Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (pp. 45–60). New York: John Wiley.
Freud, S. (1991). London, UK: Penguin Books. Essentials of Psycho-Analysis. The Definitive Collection of Sigmund Freud’s Writing.
Levinson, S. (2021). Malcolm & Marie. Burbank, California: FotoKem.
Lum, W. (2000). The Lived Experience of the Personal Iceberg Metaphor of Therapists in Satir’s Systemic Brief Therapy Training. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Lum, W. (2002). The use of self of the therapist. Contemporary Family Therapy, 24(1), 181–197.
Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and Personality (3rd ed.). Delhi, India: Pearson Education.
McDonald, S. M. (2012). Perception: A Concept Analysis. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 23(1), 2–9.
Meyers, J. (1985). Hemingway: A Biography. London: Macmillan.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception and its philosophical consequences. In J. M. Edie (Ed. & Trans.), The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History, and Politics (pp. 12-42). Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press, 12–42.
Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in close relationships: Within and cross partner effects. Universitas Psychologica, 9(1), 35–56.
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Feldman, B. L. (1997). Working models of attachment and daily social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1409–1423.
Pietromonaco, P. R., Greenwood, D., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2004). Conflict in adult close relationships: An attachment perspective. In W. S. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult Attachment: New Directions and Emerging Issues (pp. 267–299). New York: Guilford Press.
Reis, H. T., & Patrick, B. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 523-563). NY: The Guilford Press.
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 367-389). Chichester, England: Wiley.
Satir, V. (1988). The New People Making. Mountain View, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
Satir, V, Banmen, J., Gerber, J., & Gomori, M. (1991). The Satir Model: Family Therapy and Beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books.
Smith, P, (1983). Hemingway’s early manuscripts: The theory and practice of omission. Journal of Modern Literature. 10 (2): 268–288.
Siderits, M., Thompson, E., & Zahavi, D. (2010). Self, No Self?: Perspectives from Analytical, Phenomenological, and Indian traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Babbie, E. (1995). The Practice of Social Research. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of linguistics, literature and culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture (IJLLC) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJLLC right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJLLC can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJLLC volumes 6 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.