Satir et al.’s Personal Iceberg Metaphor in Malcolm & Marie: Finding Self-Understanding and Personal Development

Authors

  • Ya-huei Wang Chung Shan Medical University; Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
  • Chi-Ya Chen Department of Applied Foreign Languages, Chung Shan Medical University

Keywords:

Personal iceberg metaphor, intimate relationship, coping, personal development, self

Abstract

This study intends to use Satir et al.’s personal iceberg metaphor as a framework to uncover hidden messages in the texts of Malcolm & Marie and to explore the unexpressed inner self of Marie, who is in the midst of an argument with her lover, Malcolm. In order to reach this goal, the study uses latent-content analysis as a research technique, based on Satir et al.’s Personal Iceberg Metaphor model—behavior, coping, feelings, feelings about feelings, perceptions, expectations, yearnings, and self—as a framework to analyze the texts from the film Malcolm & Marie to realize how these metaphors can help characters, especially Marie, to reach self-understanding and personal development. When encountering the deeper layers of her personal experiences and after an exploration of these layers, Marie becomes better able to listen to her own hidden messages, realize what she yearns for, and hence, find her true self.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banmen, J. (2002). The Satir model: Yesterday and today. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 24(1), 7–22.

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursing Plus Open, 2, 8–14.

Brehm, S. S., Miller, R. S., Perlman, D., & Campbell, S. M. (2002). Intimate Relationships. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Cookson, L. J. (2015). Differences between feelings, emotions and desires in terms of interactive quality. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2(7))108-119.

Lee, C. J. (2021). Satir’s Dialogue Practice. Taipei, Taiwan: CommonWealth Education Media and Publishing.

Das, K. K. (2018). A Study on evolutionary perspectives ?of ‘Emotions’ and ‘Mood’ on biological evolutionary ?platform. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 7 (5), 89–96.?

Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (pp. 45–60). New York: John Wiley.

Freud, S. (1991). London, UK: Penguin Books. Essentials of Psycho-Analysis. The Definitive Collection of Sigmund Freud’s Writing.

Levinson, S. (2021). Malcolm & Marie. Burbank, California: FotoKem.

Lum, W. (2000). The Lived Experience of the Personal Iceberg Metaphor of Therapists in Satir’s Systemic Brief Therapy Training. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

Lum, W. (2002). The use of self of the therapist. Contemporary Family Therapy, 24(1), 181–197.

Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and Personality (3rd ed.). Delhi, India: Pearson Education.

McDonald, S. M. (2012). Perception: A Concept Analysis. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 23(1), 2–9.

Meyers, J. (1985). Hemingway: A Biography. London: Macmillan.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception and its philosophical consequences. In J. M. Edie (Ed. & Trans.), The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History, and Politics (pp. 12-42). Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press, 12–42.

Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in close relationships: Within and cross partner effects. Universitas Psychologica, 9(1), 35–56.

Pietromonaco, P. R., & Feldman, B. L. (1997). Working models of attachment and daily social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1409–1423.

Pietromonaco, P. R., Greenwood, D., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2004). Conflict in adult close relationships: An attachment perspective. In W. S. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult Attachment: New Directions and Emerging Issues (pp. 267–299). New York: Guilford Press.

Reis, H. T., & Patrick, B. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 523-563). NY: The Guilford Press.

Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 367-389). Chichester, England: Wiley.

Satir, V. (1988). The New People Making. Mountain View, CA: Science and Behavior Books.

Satir, V, Banmen, J., Gerber, J., & Gomori, M. (1991). The Satir Model: Family Therapy and Beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books.

Smith, P, (1983). Hemingway’s early manuscripts: The theory and practice of omission. Journal of Modern Literature. 10 (2): 268–288.

Siderits, M., Thompson, E., & Zahavi, D. (2010). Self, No Self?: Perspectives from Analytical, Phenomenological, and Indian traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Babbie, E. (1995). The Practice of Social Research. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Wang, Y.- huei, & Chen, C.-Y. (2022). Satir et al.’s Personal Iceberg Metaphor in Malcolm & Marie: Finding Self-Understanding and Personal Development. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 8(6). Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/2193

Issue

Section

Research Articles