The implementation of discovery learning and scientific learning approaches and students perspective in curriculum 2013
A study at 11th grade student of IPA, SMAN1 Bima, 2017/2018 academic year
Keywords:
Curriculum 2013, Discovery Learning, Scientific Learning Approaches, Students PerspectiveAbstract
This study deals with the Implementation of Discovery Learning and Scientific Learning Approaches and Students’ Perspective in Curriculum 2013. In this study, the writer would like to know how was description the Implementation of Discovery Learning and Scientific Learning approaches and students’ perspective in Curriculum 2013. The population of this study was the 11th Grade Students of IPA at SMAN 1 Bima in the Academic year 2017-2018. The writer used a descriptive qualitative. Data were collected from observation, interview, and questionnaires which had been obtained from a video recording of the naturally occurring English classroom. Then data were transcribed. In addition, the data were also gathered through teachers’ interview and questionnaires for students. The result of a study in research question for number 1 showed that teachers did not use Discovery Learning and Scientific Learning Approaches optimally in the classrooms. Therefore, this study recommended that teachers should pay attention to increase their comprehension of DLA and SLA in Curriculum 2013. While, the result of a study in research question for number 2 showed that number 1, there were 6 students chose “CA”, 12 students chose “A”, 4 student’s chose “N”, 4 students chose “LA” and there were 4 students chose “DA” or 61.33%. The second, there were 4 students chose “DA”, 5 students chose “LA”, 4 students chose “N”, 5 students chose “A” and there were 12 students chose “CA” or 49.33%. the third, there were 15 students chose “CA”, 4 students chose “A” 4 students chose “N”, 5 students chose “LA” and 2 students chose “DA” 76.66%. The fourth, there were 4 students chose “DA” or 76,66%, 3 students chose “LA” 6 students chose “N” 12 students chose “A” and 5 students chose “CA” or 52.66%. Fifth, there were 3 students chose “DA”, 5 students chose “LA”, 5 students chose “N”, 15 students chose “A” and only 2 students chose “CA” or 52.66%. Sixth, there were 8 students chose “CA”, 9 students chose “A”, 5 students chose “N”, 4 students chose “LA” and 4 students chose “DA” or 68.66%. Seventh, there were 3 students chose “DA”, 7 students chose “LA”, 3 students chose “N”, 7 students chose “A” and 10 students chose “CA” or 60 %. Eighth, there were 13 students chose “CA”, 4 students chose “A”, 4 students chose “N”, 2 students chose “LA” and 7 students chose “DA” or 69.33%. Ninth, there were 6 students chose “DA”, 4 students chose “LA”, 3 students chose “N”, 13 students chose “A” and 4 students chose “CA” or 56.66%. And the last one, there were 10 students chose “CA”, 8 students chose “A”, 3 students chose “N”, 5 students chose “LA” and 4 students chose “DA” or 70%.
Downloads
References
Alma, B. dkk. 2010. Pembelajaran Studi Sosial.
Anita, D., Mbete, A. M., & Mandala, H. (2018). Ecolexicon wealth of nautical expression in Kuta Lombok society. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research (IRJEIS), 4(3), 17-22.
Arikunto, S. (1992). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
Daryanto, D. (2014). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Frost, W., Wheeler, F., & Harvey, M. (2009). Commemorative events: sacrifice, identity and dissonance. International Perspectives of Festivals and Events, 161-171.
Gunawan, I. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.
Hamalik, O. (2007). Dasar-dasar pengembangan kurikulum. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Hosnan, M. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran abad 21: Kunci sukses implementasi kurikulum 2013. Ghalia Indonesia.
Maba, W., Perdata, I. B. K., Astawa, I. N., & Mantra, I. B. N. (2018). Conducting assessment instrument models for teacher competence, teacher welfare as an effort to enhance education quality. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences (IRJMIS), 5(3), 46-52.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge university press.
Setiawan, I., & Laksana, I. K. D. (2018). System of modality on the text of Indonesian presidential candidates debate on the period of 2014–2019. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 2(1), 157-170.
Wiles, J., Bondi, J., & Guo, H. (1989). Curriculum development: A guide to practice. Merrill Publishing Company.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Articles published in the International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific research (IRJEIS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IRJEIS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IRJEIS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IRJEIS volumes 6 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.