How green ambidexterity works?

A case study on environmental performance

https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v10n3.2302

Authors

  • I Wayan Sukarta Politeknik Negeri Bali, Indonesia
  • I Gede Made Subagiana Politeknik Negeri Bali, Indonesia
  • I Made Sarjana Politeknik Negeri Bali, Indonesia
  • Lily Marheni Politeknik Negeri Bali, Indonesia
  • Ni Ketut Lasmini Politeknik Negeri Bali, Indonesia

Keywords:

ecological environmental, environmental performance, green ambidexterity, modern industry, service innovation

Abstract

This study examines the effect of Green Ambidexterity (GA) on Environmental Performance (EP). Where the purpose of this study is to analyse the effect of Green Ambidexterity (GA) on Environmental Performance (EP) in company and assist companies in dealing with emerging ecological environmental problems. By distributing questionnaires to employees who work in the company, 100 answers were collected from the survey conducted. The results of the study found that the positive influence of Green Ambidexterity (GA) on the tested Environmental Performance (EP) was significant. Due to the dependence of environmental performance (EP) on green ambidexterity (GA), the green process of product and service innovation must be a proactive step in company activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arfi, W. B., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J. M. (2018). External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 210-220.

Ascough Ii, J. C., Maier, H. R., Ravalico, J. K., & Strudley, M. W. (2008). Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making. Ecological modelling, 219(3-4), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.015

Bui, T. D., Tsai, F. M., Tseng, M. L., Tan, R. R., Yu, K. D. S., & Lim, M. K. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis. Sustainable production and consumption, 26, 373-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.017

Chang, K. H., & Gotcher, D. F. (2020). How and when does co-production facilitate eco-innovation in international buyer-supplier relationships? The role of environmental innovation ambidexterity and institutional pressures. International Business Review, 29(5), 101731.

Chen, Y. S., Chang, C. H., & Lin, Y. H. (2014). The determinants of green radical and incremental innovation performance: Green shared vision, green absorptive capacity, and green organizational ambidexterity. Sustainability, 6(11), 7787-7806.

Crossley, R. M., Elmagrhi, M. H., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Sustainability and legitimacy theory: The case of sustainable social and environmental practices of small and medium‐sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3740-3762.

Hadjri, M. I., Perizade, B., & Farla, W. (2019, October). Green human resource management, green organizational culture, and environmental performance: An empirical study. In 2019 International Conference on Organizational Innovation (ICOI 2019) (pp. 138-143). Atlantis Press.

Jasch, C. (2000). Environmental performance evaluation and indicators. Journal of cleaner production, 8(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00235-8

Kim, Y. J., Kim, W. G., Choi, H. M., & Phetvaroon, K. (2019). The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76, 83-93.

Liefländer, A. K., Bogner, F. X., Kibbe, A., & Kaiser, F. G. (2015). Evaluating environmental knowledge dimension convergence to assess educational programme effectiveness. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 684-702.

Machado, M. C., Vivaldini, M., & de Oliveira, O. J. (2020). Production and supply-chain as the basis for SMEs’ environmental management development: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 123141.

Mansfield, E., & Lee, J. Y. (1996). The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research policy, 25(7), 1047-1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00893-1

Murphy, K. J. (1997). Executive compensation and the modern industrial revolution. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(4), 417-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(96)01027-2

Nylén, D., & Holmström, J. (2015). Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. Business horizons, 58(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.001

Paauwe, J. (2009). HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects. Journal of Management studies, 46(1), 129-142.

Shen, X., Dai, M., Yang, J., Sun, L., Tan, X., Peng, C., ... & Naz, I. (2022). A critical review on the phytoremediation of heavy metals from environment: Performance and challenges. Chemosphere, 291, 132979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132979

Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological forecasting and social change, 150, 119762.

Sun, H., Teh, P. L., & Linton, J. D. (2018). Impact of environmental knowledge and product quality on student attitude toward products with recycled/remanufactured content: Implications for environmental education and green manufacturing. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 935-945.

Úbeda-García, M., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. (2020). Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: Exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations. Journal of Business Research, 112, 363-372.

Úbeda‐García, M., Marco‐Lajara, B., Zaragoza‐Sáez, P. C., Manresa‐Marhuenda, E., & Poveda‐Pareja, E. (2022). Green ambidexterity and environmental performance: The role of green human resources. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 32-45.

Witell, L., Snyder, H., Gustafsson, A., Fombelle, P., & Kristensson, P. (2016). Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2863-2872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.055

Wu, G., Kang, H., Zhang, X., Shao, H., Chu, L., & Ruan, C. (2010). A critical review on the bio-removal of hazardous heavy metals from contaminated soils: issues, progress, eco-environmental concerns and opportunities. Journal of hazardous materials, 174(1-3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.113

Yi, Y., Li, Y., Hitt, M. A., Liu, Y., & Wei, Z. (2016). The influence of resource bundling on the speed of strategic change: Moderating effects of relational capital. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33, 435-467.

Zahoor, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2021). Relational capital, environmental knowledge integration, and environmental performance of small and medium enterprises in emerging markets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3789-3803.

Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Jiang, W., & Feng, T. (2021). Does second-order social capital matter to green innovation? The moderating role of governance ambidexterity. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.003

Published

2023-04-09

How to Cite

Sukarta, I. W., Subagiana, I. G. M., Sarjana, I. M., Marheni, L., & Lasmini, N. K. (2023). How green ambidexterity works? A case study on environmental performance. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 10(3), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v10n3.2302

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)