Legal protection of whistleblower witnesses in revealing corruption after the issue of supreme court circular no. 4 of 2011

Authors

  • Ni Nyoman Juwita Arsawati Ganesha Education University, Indonesia

Keywords:

Court circular, Issue supreme, Legal protection, Revealing corruption, Whistleblower witnesses

Abstract

In order to eliminate corruption, Indonesia has made various Efforts through the establishment of laws and development of commissions. However, corruption still occurs with all tactics and ways behind politics, economics, and power. Moreover, corruption is organized crime or white-collar crime. That why it is difficult to determine the main actor who knows much about it because corruptions Also Involved in that. To reveal corruption, then there must be a whistleblower as a witness, who is willing to reveal the corruption that has occurred because they saw, heard, and had experienced it by themselves, later practically called as a crown witness or key witness. Act No. 13/2006 and the Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 4/2011 have not been fully able to provide protection to whistleblowers from the investigation, prosecution, and examination. Since now, there are no laws that specifically against whistleblowers. It is the caused whistleblower remains silent against the corruption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Djaja, E. (2010). Memberantas Korupsi Bersama KPK (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi) Edisi Kedua.

Eddyono, S. W. (2006). Catatan Kritis Terhadap Undang-Undang No 13 tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban. Jakarta: Elsam.

Effendi, M. (2012). Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Tinjauan Terhadap Beberapa Perkembangan Hukum Pidana). Jakarta: Referensi.

Hartono, S. (1991). Politik hukum menuju satu sistem hukum nasional. Alumni.

Kaligis, O. C. (2006). Korupsi Sebagai Tindakan Kriminal Yang Harus Diberantas: Karakter dan Praktek Hukum Indonesia. Korupsi Sebagai Tindakan Kriminal Yang Harus Diberantas: Karakter dan Praktek Hukum Indonesia.

Korusi, K. P. (2002). Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

No, S. E. M. A. (4). Tahun 2011 tentang perlakuan bagi pelapor tindak pidana. Whistle Blower.

No, U. U. (8). Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Rasjidi, L., Sos, S., & Putra, I. W. (1993). Hukum sebagai suatu sistem. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Satjipto, R. (2000). Ilmu Hukum, Bandung.

Wahyudi, A. T. (2016). Penegakan Hukum Atas Pelanggaran Oleh Pengemudi Angkutan Bermuatan Pasir Batu Terhadap Rambu Larangan Masuk Kota Mojokerto (Doctoral dissertation, University of Muhammadiyah Malang).

Published

2016-03-31

How to Cite

Arsawati, N. N. J. (2016). Legal protection of whistleblower witnesses in revealing corruption after the issue of supreme court circular no. 4 of 2011. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 3(3), 27–33. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/350

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles