A comparative study of Mawasangka and Wakatobi language in South East Sulawesi

  • Haerun Ana Haluoleo University, Kendari, South East Sulawesi
Keywords: correspondence, lexicostatistics, phoneme, qualitative, quantitative

Abstract

This research aims at investigating the relationship between Mawasangka language (ML) and Wakatobi language (WL) in Southeast Sulawesi. This research was conducted based on qualitative and quantitative methods (mixed methods). The qualitative analysis shows that both languages have similar vowel and consonants sounds, and phonetic long vocoid sounds.  Besides, both languages have unique bilabial implosive consonant /ɓ/, alveolar implosive /ɗ/, velar fricative /ĝ/; and clusters of /ns/, /nt/, /nd/, /mb/, /ŋk/, /ŋg/, and /mp/; and all syllables are opened or categorized as vocalist languages. Both languages also have perfected phoneme correspondences. In addition, the result of the quantitative approach using the lexicostastics technique shows that the relationship of ML-WL is 43,43%. Based on the percentage, ML and WL show closed relationship which is categorized as different languages from the same language family.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bynon, T. (1979). The ergative construction in Kurdish. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 42(2), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X0014577X

Chaer, A. (2003). Seputar tata bahasa baku bahasa indonesia. Rineka Cipta.

Crowley, T. (1992). A dictionary of Paamese. Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.

Crowley, T., & Bowern, C. (2010). An introduction to historical linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Dyen, I. (2018). Linguistic subgrouping and lexicostatistics (Vol. 175). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Finegan, E., Besnir, N., Blair, D., & Collins, P. (1992). Language Its Structure and Use. Marricksville.

Hafsah, W. O. S. (2017). The character education meaning on rites before wedding party in Muna ethnic of Southeast Sulawesi. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 4(1), 32-38.

Ino, L., Dinar, S. S., Yunus, -, & Harmin, -. (2017). Survival Wolio language in adulthood in Baubau City: Sociolinguistic study. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(6), 1-13.

Keraf, G. (1991). Linguistik Bandingan Historis, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kooij, J. G., & Dik, S. C. (1994). Ilmu Bahasa Umum, terj. TW Kamil. Jakarta: RUL.

Lehmann, W. P. (2013). Historical linguistics: an introduction. Routledge.

Mahsun, M. S. (1995). Dialektologi diakronis: sebuah pengantar. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Poedjosoedarmo, S. (2008). Perubahan Bahasa. In Disajikan dalam Seminar Ceramah Ilmiah Linguistik Pusat Kajian Melayu. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Duta Wacana University Press.

Taalami, L. O. (2008). Mengenal Kebudayaan Wakatobi. Jakarta: Granada.

Yani, L., Artawa, K., Satyawati, N. M. S., & Udayana, I. N. (2018). Transitivity construction of verbal clause in Ciacia language. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(3), 15-23.

Published
2019-09-04
How to Cite
Ana, H. (2019). A comparative study of Mawasangka and Wakatobi language in South East Sulawesi. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(5), 226-233. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n5.733
Section
Articles