Time budget pressure on audit quality with audit structure, independence, and audit supervision as moderating variable
Keywords:
audit quality, audit structure, audit supervision, independence, time budget pressureAbstract
The audit quality of the public accounting firm / KAP was questioned as there were several cases of fraud, irregularity, and other unhealthy accounting practices that linked several public companies that had been audited and obtained an unqualified opinion / WTP. Empirical research shows that time budget pressure has an effect on audit quality but is not linear because moderating factors are suspected, including time budget pressure, audit structure, independence, and audit supervision. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of time budget pressure on audit quality. The population of KAP auditors in Bali Province and the research sample was determined by purposive sampling method. The data collected were tabulated and analyzed using the Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) technique through the following stages: classical assumption test, model feasibility test (F test), determination coefficient analysis (Ajd. R2), research hypothesis testing (t-test) for both partial and moderating effect. The results of the research show that time budget pressure has a negative effect but not statistically significant on audit quality. Furthermore, audit structure, independence, audit supervision attenuate the negative effects of time budget pressure on audit quality.
Downloads
References
Alim, M. N., Hapsari, T., & Purwanti, L. (2007). Pengaruh Kompetensi dan Independensi terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Etika Auditor sebagai Variabel Moderasi. SNA X Makassar.
Aprianto, D. (20105). Pengaruh Independensi, Pengalaman, Due Professional Care, Akuntabilitas Dan Time Budget Pressure Terhadap Kualitas Audit.
Aren, A. A., Randal J. E., & Mark S. B. (2001). Auditing dan Pelayanan Verifikasi. Jakarta: Indeks.
Arens, A. A., & Loebbecke, J. L. (2008). Auditing Pendekatan Terpadu, Terjemahan oleh Amir Abadi Yusuf. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Arisinta, O. (2013). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Time Budget Pressure, dan Audit Fee Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Surabaya. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Airlangga (JEBA)| Journal of Economics and Business Airlangga, 23(3).
Azad, A. N. (1994). Time budget pressure and filtering of time practices in internal auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal.
Bamber, E. M., Snowball, D., & Tubbs, R. M. (1989). Audit structure and its relation to role conflict and role ambiguity: An empirical investigation. Accounting review, 285-299.
Basuki, B., & Mahardani, K. Y. (2006). Pengaruh tekanan anggaran waktu terhadap perilaku disfungsional auditor dan kualitas audit pada kantor akuntan publik di Surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi & Sistem Informasi, 6(2), 203-223.
Bowrin, A. R. (1998). Review and synthesis of audit structure literature. Journal of Accounting literature, 17, 40.
Braun, R. L. (2000). The effect of time pressure on auditor attention to qualitative aspects of misstatements indicative of potential fraudulent financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(3), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00044-6
Christiawan, Y. J. (2002). Kompetensi dan independensi akuntan publik: refleksi hasil penelitian empiris. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 4(2), 79-92.
DeZoort, F. T. (1998). Time pressure research in auditing: Implications for practice. The Auditor’s Report, 22(1), 11-12.
DeZoort, F. T., & Lord, A. T. (1997). A review and synthesis of pressure effects research in accounting. Journal of accounting literature, 16, 28.
Djalil, M. A. (2002). Persepsi Auditor Tentang Pengaruh Struktur Audit dan Prinsip Organisasional Terhadap Konflik dan Ambiguitas Peran. Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Syah Kuala, 5, 146-162.
Dutadasanovan, Y. (2013). Pengaruh Time Budget Pressure Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Independensi Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Kasus Pada BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Tengah) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Semarang).
Eriani, E. (2010). Pengaruh Struktur Audit, Konflik Peran, dan Ketidakjelasan Peran Terhadap Kinerja Auditor (Studi Pada KAP di Sumatera Barat). Skripsi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Andalas.
Ernawati, P. S., & Fitri, L. W. (2017). Pengaruh Independensi, Etika Profesi, Profesionalisme, Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Auditor (Studi Empiris pada KAP di Kota Surakarta dan Yogyakarta) (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Surakarta).
Fanani, Z., Hanif, R. A., & Subroto, B. (2008). Pengaruh struktur audit, konflik peran, dan ketidakjelasan peran terhadap kinerja auditor. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 5(2), 139-155.
Fisher, J. G. (1998). Contingency theory, management control systems and firm outcomes: past results and future directions. Behavioral research in accounting, 10, 47.
Gasperz, J. (2014). Pengaruh Tekanan Anggaran Waktu Sebagai Variabel Moderasi terhadap Hubungan antara Faktor Individu dan Kualitas Audit. Dinamika Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 3(1).
Gayatri, K. D. P., & Suputra, I. D. (2016). Pengaruh Struktur Audit, Tekanan Waktu, Disiplin Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi pada Kinerja Auditor. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, Mei (15), 1366-1391.
Georgiades, G. (2006). Audit procedures. CCH.
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete IBM SPSS 23, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang. 2016. Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS, 23.
Ghozali, I. (2017). Econometrics Theory, Concepts, and Applications with SPSS 17. Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.
Govindarajan, V. (1986). Impact of participation in the budgetary process on managerial attitudes and performance: Universalistic and contingency perspectives. Decision sciences, 17(4), 496-516.
Gul, F. A., Kim, J. B., & Qiu, A. A. (2010). Ownership concentration, foreign shareholding, audit quality, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Journal of financial economics, 95(3), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.11.005
Gupta, P. P., Umanath, N. S., & Dirsmith, M. W. (1999). Supervision practices and audit effectiveness: an empirical analysis of GAO audits. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 11, 27.
Hanif, R. A. (2013). Pengaruh Struktur Audit, Konflik Peran, dan Ketidakjelasan Peran Terhadap Kinerja Auditor, Jurnal Ekonomi, Vol. 21, No. 3 September.
Hapsari, R. E. (2016). Pengaruh Independensi, Time Budget Pressure, Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor, Etika Auditor Dan Pengalaman Kerja Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Hasil Pemeriksaan Auditor Pemerintah Daerah (Survai Pada Inspektorat Kota/Kabupaten Se-Eks Karesidenan Surakarta) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Hartanto, H. Y. (2001). Analisis Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan Terhadap Judgment Auditor (Doctoral dissertation, [Yogyakarta]: Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Herawaty, S. A. (2007). Analisis pengaruh independensi, mekanisme corporate governance, dan kualitas audit terhadap integritas laporan keuangan. Makalah Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X, Makassar.
Herrbach, O. (2001). Audit quality, auditor behaviour and the psychological contract. European Accounting Review, 10(4), 787-802.
Huda, M. (2000). Hubungan Antara Tindakan Supervisi Dengan Kepuasan Kerja. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 2(1), 33-44.
Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (2016). Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik. Jakarta :Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Jelista, M. (2015). Pengaruh Kompleksitas Audit. Tekanan Anggaran Waktu, Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit, 2(2), 1-15.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kelley, T., & Seller, R. E. (1982). Auditor stress and time budgets. The CPA Journal (pre-1986), 52(000012), 24.
Kelly, T., Margheim, L., & Pattison, D. (1999). Survey on the differential effects of time deadline pressure versus time budget pressure on auditor behavior. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 15(4), 117-128.
Kirana, I. G. A. M. I., & Ramantha, I. W. (2020). The effect of auditor rotation, time pressure, and audit tenure on audit quality with auditor specialization as moderation variable. International research journal of management, IT and social sciences, 7(3), 126-136.
Kurnia, K. (2018). Pengaruh Tekanan Waktu Audit Dan Locus Of Control Terhadap Tindakan Yang Menurunkan Kualitas Audit. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan), 15(4), 456-476.
Kurnia, W., Khomsiyah, K., & Sofie, S. (2014). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Tekanan Waktu, dan Etika Auditor terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 1(2), 49-67.
Lowensohn, S., Johnson, L. E., Elder, R. J., & Davies, S. P. (2007). Auditor specialization, perceived audit quality, and audit fees in the local government audit market. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 705-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.10.004
Meier, H. H., & Fuglister, J. (1992). How to improve audit quality: Perceptions of auditors and clients. The Ohio CPA Journal, 6, 21-24.
Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2014). Jasa audit dan assurance: pendekatan sistematis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Mindarti, C. S. (2015). Pengaruh karakteristik individu terhadap kinerja auditor. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 18(3), 59-74.
Muhshyi, A. (2013). Pengaruh Time Budget Pressure, Risiko Kesalahan dan Kompleksitas terhadap Kualitas Audit.
Mulyadi. (2008). Sistem Akuntansi. Cetakan Keempat. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Murray, D. (1990). The performance effects of participative budgeting: An integration of intervening and moderating variables. Behavioral Research in accounting, 2(2), 104-123.
Ningsih, S. (2015). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi dan Jenis Kelamin Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Kecerdasan Emosional Sebagai Variabel Moderasi: Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Malang.
Nuraini, L. (2017). Pengaruh independensi, gaya kepemimpinan, dan budaya organisasi terhadap kinerja auditor (studi empiris pada kantor akuntan publik Yogyakarta dan Solo). Jurnal Profita: Kajian Ilmu Akuntansi, 5(2).
Outley, D. (1991). Management Control, Organizational Desaign and Accounting Information System.
Prasita, A., & Adi, P. H. (2007). Pengaruh kompleksitas audit dan tekanan anggaran waktu terhadap kualitas audit dengan moderasi pemahaman terhadap sistem informasi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 13(1), 54-78.
Putra, I. G. B. W., Wira, G. B., & Ariyanto, D. (2012). Pengaruh Independensi, Profesionalisme, Struktur Audit, dan Role Stress Terhadap Kinerja Auditor BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Bali. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 1(1), 1-18.
Putri, S. W. (2013). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi Dan Pengalaman Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Yogyakarta dan Surakarta) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Seni, F., D. (2012). Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan, Kompleksitas Tugas, Pengetahuan dan Persepsi Etis terhadap Audit Judgement. Dipongoro Journal of Accounting 1(1), 1-12
Sososutiksno, C. (2003). Hubungan tekanan anggaran waktu dengan perilaku disfungsional serta pengaruhnya terhadap kualitas audit (Doctoral dissertation, [Yogyakarta]: Universitas Gadjah Mada).
Stuart, I., & Prawitt, D. F. (2004). The influence of audit structure on auditors' performance in high and low complexity task settings. Available at SSRN 569871.
Tunggal, A. W. (2000). Auditing Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka Cipta.
Utami, R., & Sirajuddin, B. (2013). Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP), Masa Perikatan Dan Tekanan Waktu Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurusan Akuntansi S, 1.
Willett, C., & Page, M. (1996). A survey of time budget pressure and irregular auditing practices among newly qualified UK chartered accountants. The British Accounting Review, 28(2), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1996.0009
Yulistiyani, N. (2014). Pengaruh Independensi Auditor, Gaya Kepemimpinan, Komitmen Organisasi Dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Auditor (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Surakarta Dan Yogyakarta) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2020 International research journal of management, IT and social sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social sciences (IRJMIS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IRJMIS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IRJMIS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IRJMIS volumes 7 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
