International research journal of management, IT and social sciences https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>IRJMIS&nbsp;</strong>is published in English and it is open to authors around the world regardless of the nationality. It is currently published three times a year, i.e. in&nbsp;<em>January, March, May, July, September,&nbsp;</em>and<em>&nbsp;November.</em></p> en-US <p>Articles published in the International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social sciences (<strong>IRJMIS</strong>) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</a>). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant <strong>IRJMIS&nbsp;</strong>right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.</p> <p>Articles published in <strong>IRJMIS&nbsp;</strong>can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (<em>e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book</em>), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.</p> <p>This copyright notice applies to articles published in <strong>IRJMIS&nbsp;</strong>volumes 7 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under&nbsp;<a href="https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/history">Journal History</a>.</p> irjmis@sloap.org (Editorial Office) support@sloap.org (Vedran Vucic) Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.13 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Outsourcing relationships: Strategies, challenges, and best practices https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/2603 <p>This study examines the transformation of outsourcing from a peripheral cost-saving measure into a strategic function within non-profit and public sector operations. Using United Nations (UN) peacekeeping missions as a high-stakes case, it addresses persistent gaps in governance, performance measurement, and risk management. A mixed-methods design integrates Transaction Cost Economics, the Resource-Based View, and Relational View Theory with empirical evidence drawn from 1,200 UN procurement contracts (2015–2023), thematic analysis of 12 mission reports, and 35 interviews with procurement officers in Mali, South Sudan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. A comparative case study of six logistics vendors within the MINUSCA mission in the CAR further grounds the analysis. Findings reveal that structured outsourcing models reduce costs by 18–32%, performance scorecards raise service-level agreement compliance by 25%, and dynamic risk tools cut supply chain disruptions by 40% in conflict zones. Blockchain-enabled contract transparency shortens payment delays by 35%, strengthening operational trust. Practically, the research delivers a unified outsourcing scorecard for non-profits, standardised ethical contract templates, AI-driven vendor assessment tools, and frameworks that align fiscal efficiency with humanitarian mandates. These contributions advance both scholarly understanding and practitioner capacity in volatile environments. </p> Ken A. Charles Copyright (c) 2026 International research journal of management, IT and social sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/2603 Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000 Governing the adaptive organism: A framework for human-AI symbiosis in anticipatory project management https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/2606 <p>Purpose: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into project management is accelerating, yet governance frameworks have failed to keep pace with the transition from tool-based automation to genuine human-AI symbiosis. This article synthesizes literature across four fragmented domains to propose a unified governance model for anticipatory project management. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic, integrative review was conducted covering: AI in project management, Human-AI collaboration, Anticipatory governance, and Complexity theory. The synthesis draws on peer-reviewed literature from 2023-2026, integrating seminal work on human-AI co-agency and adaptive systems. Findings: The review reveals a fundamental tension: technological capability outpaces organisational absorption. To address this, the article introduces the Adaptive Organism Governance (AOG) Framework. This model reconceptualises the project organisation as a complex adaptive system comprising four interdependent dimensions: Cognitive Augmentation, Collaborative Intelligence, Anticipatory Sensing, and Complexity Absorption. The framework is operationalized through six governance principles: subsidiarity, transparency, adaptability, resilience, human-centricity, and continuous learning. Originality/value: This article provides the first comprehensive synthesis linking AI technical capabilities with anticipatory governance theory. The AOG Framework offers a theoretically grounded, actionable pathway for practitioners navigating the digital transformation of project delivery, shifting the focus from controlling machines to cultivating symbiotic ecosystems.</p> Ken A. Charles Copyright (c) 2026 International research journal of management, IT and social sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/2606 Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000