Discussing practical work methods in digital tools-performance based architecture assignments
Keywords:
architect assignments, digital tools, discussion, practical works, work methodsAbstract
This study discussed practical work methods for architectural tasks based on digital technology. We carry out a series of data thefts and analyze them under a phenomenological approach. Among other things, we code the data, evaluate interpretations and draw conclusions to get valid and convincing answers. Searching for data electronically on publications released between 2010 and 2022 is because, during this era, there was a rapid development of the use and transformation of lodges in the world. After reviewing the data, we reported it qualitatively by relying on secondary data in a systematic review design. The results include that digital applications have helped architects' world tasks effectively and efficiently. We hope these findings contribute to the works of academics, researchers, and policymaking.
Downloads
References
Ashby, M. F., & Johnson, K. (2013). Materials and design: the art and science of material selection in product design. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Attaran, M. (2017). The rise of 3-D printing: The advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Business horizons, 60(5), 677-688.
Balletti, C., Ballarin, M., & Guerra, F. (2017). 3D printing: State of the art and future perspectives. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 26, 172-182.
Barrie, J. (2016). Applications for cloud-based CAD in design education and collaboration. In DS 83: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE16), Design Education: Collaboration and Cross-Disciplinarity, Aalborg, Denmark, 8th-9th September 2016 (pp. 178-183).
Calori, C., & Vanden-Eynden, D. (2015). Signage and wayfinding design: a complete guide to creating environmental graphic design systems. John Wiley & Sons.
Capilla, R., Jansen, A., Tang, A., Avgeriou, P., & Babar, M. A. (2016). 10 years of software architecture knowledge management: Practice and future. Journal of Systems and Software, 116, 191-205.
Carpo, M. (Ed.). (2012). The digital turn in architecture 1992-2012. John Wiley & Sons.
Chan, M. M., & Blikstein, P. (2018). Exploring problem-based learning for middle school design and engineering education in digital fabrication laboratories. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(2).
Compher, C., Frankenfield, D., Keim, N., Roth-Yousey, L., & Evidence Analysis Working Group. (2006). Best practice methods to apply to measurement of resting metabolic rate in adults: a systematic review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106(6), 881-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2006.02.009
de Vasconselos, T. B., & Sperling, D. (2017). From representational to parametric and algorithmic interactions: A panorama of Digital Architectural Design teaching in Latin America. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 15(3), 215-229.
Di Roma, A. (2017). Footwear Design. The paradox of" tailored shoe" in the contemporary digital manufacturing systems. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S2689-S2699.
Ergün, O., Ak?n, ?., Dino, ?. G., & Surer, E. (2019, March). Architectural design in virtual reality and mixed reality environments: A comparative analysis. In 2019 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR) (pp. 914-915). IEEE.
Fonseca, D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., Navarro, I., & Sánchez, A. (2014). Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Computers in human behavior, 31, 434-445.
Fortin, N., Lemieux, T., & Firpo, S. (2011). Decomposition methods in economics. In Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4, pp. 1-102). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)00407-2
Fucci, M. (2011). The Evolution of Digital Tools for Product Design. In Innovation in Product Design (pp. 1-14). Springer, London.
Ghajargar, M. (2018). Designing Tools for Reflection (Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Dissertation. Politecnico di Torino. https://doi. org/10.6092/polito/porto/2702550).
Gobeil, S. M. C., Janowska, K., McDowell, S., Mansouri, K., Parks, R., Stalls, V., ... & Acharya, P. (2021). Effect of natural mutations of SARS-CoV-2 on spike structure, conformation, and antigenicity. Science, 373(6555), eabi6226.
Gu, N., Kim, M. J., & Maher, M. L. (2011). Technological advancements in synchronous collaboration: The effect of 3D virtual worlds and tangible user interfaces on architectural design. Automation in Construction, 20(3), 270-278.
Hensel, M., Menges, A., & Weinstock, M. (2013). Emergent technologies and design: towards a biological paradigm for architecture. Routledge.
Hienerth, C., Keinz, P., & Lettl, C. (2011). Exploring the nature and implementation process of user-centric business models. Long Range Planning, 44(5-6), 344-374.
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897
Inam, A. (2013). Designing urban transformation. Routledge.
Iwamoto, L. (2013). Digital fabrications: architectural and material techniques. Princeton Architectural Press.
Karhu, O., Kansi, P., & Kuorinka, I. (1977). Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. Applied ergonomics, 8(4), 199-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8
Kato, J., & Goto, M. (2017, June). F3. js: A parametric design tool for physical computing devices for both interaction designers and end-users. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 1099-1110).
Kavako?lu, A. A., Özer, D. G., Domingo-Callabuig, D., & Bilen, Ö. (2021). Architectural design communication (ADC) in online education during COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison of Turkish and Spanish universities. Open House International.
Kazi, R. H., Grossman, T., Cheong, H., Hashemi, A., & Fitzmaurice, G. W. (2017, October). DreamSketch: Early Stage 3D Design Explorations with Sketching and Generative Design. In UIST (Vol. 14, pp. 401-414).
Khalil, H. A., Alwani, M. S., Islam, M. N., Suhaily, S. S., Dungani, R., H’ng, Y. M., & Jawaid, M. (2015). The use of bamboo fibres as reinforcements in composites. In Biofiber reinforcements in composite materials (pp. 488-524). Woodhead Publishing.
Kimura, F., Thangavelu, S. M., Narjoko, D., & Findlay, C. (2020). Pandemic (COVID?19) policy, regional cooperation and the emerging global production network. Asian Economic Journal, 34(1), 3-27.
Knodel, J., & Naab, M. (2014, February). Mitigating the Risk of software change in practice: Retrospective on more than 50 architecture evaluations in industry (Keynote paper). In 2014 Software Evolution Week-IEEE Conference on Software Maintenance, Reengineering, and Reverse Engineering (CSMR-WCRE) (pp. 2-17). IEEE.
Ko?ata, J., & Zierke, P. (2021). The Decline of Architects: Can a Computer Design Fine Architecture without Human Input?. Buildings, 11(8), 338.
Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2006). Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002
Kroll, E. (2013). Design theory and conceptual design: contrasting functional decomposition and morphology with parameter analysis. Research in Engineering Design, 24(2), 165-183.
Lu, Y., & Qian, J. (2020). Towards a material approach in rural geography: Architectural experiments in China’s rural renaissance and reconstruction movements. Geoforum, 116, 119-129.
Ma, W., Cheng, F., Xu, Y., Wen, Q., & Liu, Y. (2019). Probabilistic representation and inverse design of metamaterials based on a deep generative model with semi?supervised learning strategy. Advanced Materials, 31(35), 1901111.
Maliha, M. N., Tayeh, B. A., & Abu Aisheh, Y. I. (2020). Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Enhancing the Applying of Knowledge Areas in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) Industry. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 14(1).
Merritt, W. S., Fu, B., Ticehurst, J. L., El Sawah, S., Vigiak, O., Roberts, A. M., ... & Jakeman, A. J. (2017). Realizing modelling outcomes: A synthesis of success factors and their use in a retrospective analysis of 15 Australian water resource projects. Environmental Modelling & Software, 94, 63-72.
Mödinger, M., Woll, A., & Wagner, I. (2022). Video-based visual feedback to enhance motor learning in physical education—a systematic review. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 52(3), 447-460.
Monsalve-Pulido, J., Aguilar, J., & Montoya, E. (2022). Framework for the adaptation of an autonomous academic recommendation system as a service-oriented architecture. Education and Information Technologies, 1-21.
Münster, S., Georgi, C., Heijne, K., Klamert, K., Noennig, J. R., Pump, M., ... & van der Meer, H. (2017). How to involve inhabitants in urban design planning by using digital tools? An overview on a state of the art, key challenges and promising approaches. Procedia Computer Science, 112, 2391-2405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.102
Mutaz, T., Khalid, Z., & Kamoona, H. H. A. (2021). The revival of the historic Islamic geometric pattern on the gate of The Al-Sharabeya School in Wasit City using the Grasshopper program. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 9(2), 389-399.
Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 41(6), 1029-1055.
Orengo, C. A., Michie, A. D., Jones, S., Jones, D. T., Swindells, M. B., & Thornton, J. M. (1997). CATH–a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure, 5(8), 1093-1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00260-8
Parker, W. C., & Hess, D. (2001). Teaching with and for discussion. Teaching and teacher education, 17(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00057-3
Putro, H. T., & Wirasmoyo, W. (2020, February). The Application of Digital Fabrication in Architecture, Case Study: Prototyping a Scale Model. In EduARCHsia & Senvar 2019 International Conference (EduARCHsia 2019) (pp. 1-7). Atlantis Press.
Rantala, A., Pikkarainen, M., & Pölkki, T. (2020). Health specialists’ views on the needs for developing a digital gaming solution for paediatric day surgery: A qualitative study. Journal of clinical nursing, 29(17-18), 3541-3552.
Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., & Teicholz, P. (2018). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, designers, engineers, contractors, and facility managers. John Wiley & Sons.
Sauvé, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environmental development, 17, 48-56.
Sebastian, R. (2011). Changing roles of the clients, architects and contractors through BIM. Engineering, construction and architectural management.
Senkul, P., & Toroslu, I. H. (2005). An architecture for workflow scheduling under resource allocation constraints. Information Systems, 30(5), 399-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2004.03.003
Shih, Y. T., Sher, W. D., & Taylor, M. (2017). Using suitable design media appropriately: Understanding how designers interact with sketching and CAD modelling in design processes. Design studies, 53, 47-77.
Singh, R. S. (2015). Darwin’s legacy II: why biology is not physics, or why it has taken a century to see the dependence of genes on the environment. Genome, 58(1), 55-62.
Son, H., Lee, S., & Kim, C. (2015). What drives the adoption of building information modeling in design organizations? An empirical investigation of the antecedents affecting architects' behavioral intentions. Automation in construction, 49, 92-99.
Souillard-Mandar, W., Davis, R., Rudin, C., Au, R., Libon, D. J., Swenson, R., ... & Penney, D. L. (2016). Learning classification models of cognitive conditions from subtle behaviors in the digital clock drawing test. Machine learning, 102(3), 393-441.
Stavric, M., & Marina, O. (2011). Parametric modeling for advanced architecture. International journal of applied mathematics and informatics, 5(1), 9-16.
Stiggelbout, A. M., Pieterse, A. H., & De Haes, J. C. (2015). Shared decision making: concepts, evidence, and practice. Patient education and counseling, 98(10), 1172-1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.022
Thorne, S. (2016). Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice. Routledge.
Trevisan, L., Krishnamurthy, P. G., & Meckel, T. A. (2017). Impact of 3D capillary heterogeneity and bedform architecture at the sub-meter scale on CO2 saturation for buoyant flow in clastic aquifers. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 56, 237-249.
Wortmann, T., & Tunçer, B. (2017). Differentiating parametric design: Digital workflows in contemporary architecture and construction. Design Studies, 52, 173-197.
Zhang, S., Teizer, J., Lee, J. K., Eastman, C. M., & Venugopal, M. (2013). Building information modeling (BIM) and safety: Automatic safety checking of construction models and schedules. Automation in construction, 29, 183-195.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2023 International journal of humanities, literature & arts
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Humanities, Literature & arts (IJHLA) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJHLA right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJHLA can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
