Dharmaning ksatrya leadership in santi work culture formation

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhla.v6n1.2062

Authors

  • I Gede Ngurah Lana Saputra Universitas Hindu Indonesia, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Ida Bagus Dharmika Universitas Hindu Indonesia, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Putu Gelgel Universitas Hindu Indonesia, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

bureaucracy, leadership, philosophy, politic, santi work culture

Abstract

This study analyzes Hindu leadership based on the values ??of Puputan Klungkung's war struggle with the spirit of dharmaning ksatrya as a form of tindih and wirang which is implemented in forming a polite and innovative work culture of bureaucratic organizations to create a superior and prosperous Klungkung society. Dharmaning ksatrya leadership is a Hindu leadership value based on dharma as philosophy and pesaja as ethics in improving bureaucratic performance. The process of forming a santi work culture in the Klungkung Regency Government is carried out in stages and continuously. Starting with the significance stage (discussing changes in the socio-cultural work of the bureaucracy) followed by aspects of domination (control of political and economic resources) and legitimacy with the enactment of a Klungkung Regent Regulation No. 14 of 2021 concerning the Code of Ethics for State Civil Servants of the Klungkung Regency Government.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political geography, 24(8), 875-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002

DeJoy, D. M. (2005). Behavior change versus culture change: Divergent approaches to managing workplace safety. Safety science, 43(2), 105-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.02.001

Efendy, M. R. (2021). Motif Atlet Dari Keluarga Miskin Dalam Menekuni Olahraga Hockey Di Kota Surabaya. Paradigma, 10(1).

Elkins, T., & Keller, R. T. (2003). Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework. The leadership quarterly, 14(4-5), 587-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00053-5

Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5

Giddens, A. (1995). Human societies: an introductory reader in sociology. Polity Press.

Gunada, I. B., & Sukarma, I. W. (2012). Aneka Politik Hindu. Denpasar: Widya Dharma.

Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Schuler, D. (2004). Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 30(6), 837-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.003

Meganada, I. W., Yasa, W. S., & Utama, W. B. (2020). Architecture various forms of sanggah kemulan taksu in Denpasar. International Journal of Humanities, Literature & Arts, 3(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijhla.v3n1.153

Nashir, H. (2012). Memahami Strukturasi dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Giddens. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 7(1), 1-9.

Nufus, A. N. A. (2019). Teori Strukturasi: Habitus dan Kapital dalam Strategi Kekuasaan (Studi Kepemimpinan Perpustakaan Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta). LIBRIA, 11(2), 11-28.

Provan, D. J., Dekker, S. W., & Rae, A. J. (2017). Bureaucracy, influence and beliefs: A literature review of the factors shaping the role of a safety professional. Safety science, 98, 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.006

Ridha, M. (2020). Teori Motivasi Mcclelland Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran Pai. Palapa, 8(1), 1-16.

Rosliana dkk, “Peran Kepemimpinan Dalam Menumbuhkan Inovasi Sektor Publik di Kabupaten Kulon Progo”. Bunga Rampai Administrasi Publik, PIPEL-LAN, 2018.

Rosliana, L. (2018). Omotenashi: Budaya Keramahtamahan di Jepang (Akar Budaya dan Manifestasinya). KIRYOKU, 2(3), 135-142.

Sarkar, S. (2014). Environmental philosophy: From theory to practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 45, 89-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.10.010

Sihotang, K. J. (2012). Struktur dan Kultur Dominasi: Relasi Agensi dan Strukturasi dalam Pembentukan Kultur Prajurit TNI Angkatan Darat pada Era Reformasi. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 8(2), 75-87.

Suryono, A. (2014). Kebijakan publik untuk kesejahteraan rakyat. Transparansi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 6(2), 98-102.

Suwaryo, U. (2010). Perubahan Sosial Dan Dinamika Pemerintahan. governance, 1(1), 21-31.

Suweta, I. M. (2020). Kepemimpinan Berdasarkan Dharma Dalam Teks Kakawin Brahmanda Purana. PARIKSA: Jurnal Hukum Agama Hindu, 3(2).

Tosun, J., & Howlett, M. (2021). Managing slow onset events related to climate change: The role of public bureaucracy. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 50, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.02.003

Van Knippenberg, B., Van Knippenberg, D., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2005). Research in leadership, self, and identity: A sample of the present and a glimpse of the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 495-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.006

Yang, J. T. (2007). Knowledge sharing: Investigating appropriate leadership roles and collaborative culture. Tourism management, 28(2), 530-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.08.006

Published

2023-01-12

How to Cite

Saputra, I. G. N. L., Dharmika, I. B., & Gelgel, I. P. (2023). Dharmaning ksatrya leadership in santi work culture formation. International Journal of Humanities, Literature and Arts, 6(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijhla.v6n1.2062