Analysis of income and risk of Porang farming
Keywords:
farming, income, Porang, production, riskAbstract
This research data analyzed quantitatively to find the amount of income and risk of farming. The research was conducted in Mundeh Kauh Village, West Selemadeg District, Tabanan Regency and Depeha Village, Kubu Additional District, Buleleng Regency. The samples were taken from 19 Porang farmers from members of the Maju Bersama farmer group using the saturated sampling method and 11 Porang farmers from the Bali Porang Farmers Association (P3B) using the accidental sampling method. Farming income is the difference between the farming income obtained and the total farming expenditure. Farming risk is analyzed using the coefficient of variation. The research results reveal the following. The average income of Porang farming in Bali is IDR 2,130,493.46 per production cycle with an average plant population of 2,155 plants. The risk of Porang farming is classified as a large risk as indicated by the coefficient of variation (CV) value of Porang farming income of 1.96 (>0.5). The source of risk in Porang farming is the high variation in production due to exposure to tuber caterpillar attacks and falling prices due to the closure of Indonesian Porang exports due to non-fulfillment of food safety requirements in importing countries.
Downloads
References
Dewi, N. K. (2017). Respon tanaman stroberi (Fragaria sp.) terhadap berbagai campuran dan volume media tanam pada budidaya di dataran medium (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Mataram).
Hernanto, F. (1993). Ilmu Usahatani. 309 hlm. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta. Indonesia.
Kadarsan, H. W. (1995). Keuangan pertanian dan pembiayaan perusahaan agribisnis.
Komarek, A. M., De Pinto, A., & Smith, V. H. (2020). A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems, 178, 102738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102738
Lien, G., Hardaker, J. B., & Flaten, O. (2007). Risk and economic sustainability of crop farming systems. Agricultural systems, 94(2), 541-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2007.01.006
Lovarelli, D., Bacenetti, J., & Guarino, M. (2020). A review on dairy cattle farming: Is precision livestock farming the compromise for an environmental, economic and social sustainable production?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121409
Mertz, O., Wadley, R. L., & Christensen, A. E. (2005). Local land use strategies in a globalizing world: Subsistence farming, cash crops and income diversification. Agricultural systems, 85(3), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.06.007
Miyata, S., Minot, N., & Hu, D. (2009). Impact of contract farming on income: linking small farmers, packers, and supermarkets in China. World development, 37(11), 1781-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.025
Moreira, G. M. J., Celleri, J. E. A., & Plaza, C. L. M. (2021). Viability and artisanal production of bread fruit snacks from ancestral knowledge. International Journal of Life Sciences & Earth Sciences, 4(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijle.v4n1.1641
Mosher, A. T. (1987). Menggerakkan dan membangun pertanian. Yasaguna, Jakarta.
Mubyarto. (1973). Pengantar ekonomi pertanian. Lembaga Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerangan Ekonomi & Sosial.
Mutiara, F., & Kholil, A. Y. (2022). Manajemen Resiko dalam Usahatani Padi di Desa Gerbo, Kecamatan Purwodadi, Kabupaten Pasuruan. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 6(3), 911-920.
Nemecek, T., Huguenin-Elie, O., Dubois, D., Gaillard, G., Schaller, B., & Chervet, A. (2011). Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: II. Extensive and intensive production. Agricultural systems, 104(3), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.007
Nicholson, W., & Snyder, C. M. (2012). Microeconomic theory: Basic principles and extensions. Cengage Learning.
Pannell, D. J., Malcolm, B., & Kingwell, R. S. (2000). Are we risking too much? Perspectives on risk in farm modelling. Agricultural Economics, 23(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(00)00058-X
Pasolong, H. (2008). Kepemimpinan Birokrasi, CV. Alfabeta, Bandung.
Payraudeau, S., & van der Werf, H. M. (2005). Environmental impact assessment for a farming region: a review of methods. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 107(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.12.012
Pinem, W. S., & Afifuddin, S. A. (2015). Peranan Perbankan Bagi Pengembangan Usaha Petani Jeruk di Kab. Karo. Jurnal ekonomi dan Keuangan, 2(6).
Prihatman, K. (2000). Pepaya (Carica papaya L.). Sistem Informasi Manajemen Pembangunan Di Perdesaan. Jakarta: BAPPENAS.
Sandhu, H. S., Wratten, S. D., Cullen, R., & Case, B. (2008). The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach. Ecological economics, 64(4), 835-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.007
Simanjuntak, R. (2013). Risiko Produksi Ayam Ras Pedaging Pada Peternakan di Kecamatan Pamijahan Kabupaten Bogor, Jawa Barat.
Soekartawi, D., John, L., & Hardaker, J. B. (1986). Ilmu usahatani dan penelitian untuk pengembengan petani kecil. (No Title).
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.
Suparmoko, M. (2000). Pengantar Ekonomika Makro. Edisi keempat. BPFE.
Suratiyah, K. (2015). Ilmu Usaha tani (edisi revisi). Penebar Swadaya Grup.
Suyamto, A. S., Agustian, A., Triwiratno, A., & Winarno, M. (2005). Prospek dan arah pengembangan agribisnis jeruk. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembanga Pertanian, Departemen Pertanian, Jakarta.
Toma, L., & Mathijs, E. (2007). Environmental risk perception, environmental concern and propensity to participate in organic farming programmes. Journal of Environmental Management, 83(2), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.02.004
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 International journal of life sciences and earth sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Life sciences & Earth sciences (IJLE) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJLE right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJLE can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
