Economic crisis as a supernatural being in public discourse

Authors

Keywords:

Concept, Source Domain, Economic Crisis, Public Discourse, Conceptual Metaphor

Abstract

The aim of the research was to reveal and compare the peculiarities of economic crisis conceptualization in Lithuanian and German public discourse. The research was focused on conceptual metaphors that are characteristic for the source domain SUPERNATURAL BEING. The main research method is the analysis of conceptual metaphors based on the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. The metaphor is understood not as a linguistic phenomenon, but as a thinking strategy, mapping from a source domain to a target domain. In this context, the significance of research into conceptual metaphors in linguistics is obvious, because metaphors are a linguistic reflection of thinking processes. Thus, by revealing the mode of conceptual metaphors as well as the ways they are realized, we partially reveal the thinking and behavioral strategies that are characteristic for a given nation. Both linguistic communities explain the crisis by the names of supernatural beings. Metaphorical expressions present the crisis as a phenomenon beyond human control and an inevitable necessity caused by supernatural beings. These features are reflected by universal conceptual metaphors in both languages, but their linguistic expression in German and Lithuanian is partly unique. Collected metaphorical expressions and research results were applied compiling the first of its kind Conceptual Metaphors Dictionary of Lithuanian Public Discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bartmiński, J. (2013). The cognitive definition as a text of culture. W: The Linguistic Worldview. Ethnolinguistics, Cognition, and Culture. Głaz, A., DS Danaher, P. Łozowski (eds.). London: Versita, 161-180.

Billaiya, R., Malaiya, S., & Parihar, K. S. (2017). Impact of Socio Economic Trends on Students in Quality Education System. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 1(1), 16-20.

Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological review, 112(1), 193.

Cibulskienė, J. (2012). Metaphors of economic and financial crisis: identified, interpreted and explained. Respectus Philologicus, 22(27).

Cibulskienė, J. (2013). The force metaphor in conceptualizing economic recession. Respectus Philologicus, 23(28).

Cibulskienė, J. (2013). what is economic recession: a (pot) hole or a burden? a crosscultural study of the conceptualization of economic recession via the JOURNEY metaphor. Anglistics in Lithuania: Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Aspects of Study. newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 64-93.

Čubajevaitė, L. (2013). Sociolingvistinis Kauno moksleivių paveikslas (Doctoral dissertation, Vytautas Magnus University).

Ghosh, C. (2017). A Study on-Evaluating Marketing Strategies Adopted by Home Appliance for Economic Development in India. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 1(1), 9-15.

Grady, J. E. (1997). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics (includes Cognitive Linguistic Bibliography), 8(4), 267-290.

Group, P. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and symbol, 22(1), 1-39.

Haser, V. (2005). Metaphor, metonymy, and experientialist philosophy: Challenging cognitive semantics (Vol. 49). Walter de Gruyter.

Jain, P., Billaiya, R., & Malaiya, S. (2017). A Correlational Analysis of Academic Stress in Adolescents in Respect of Socio-Economic Status. International Journal of Physical Sciences and Engineering (IJPSE), 1(1), 68-71.

Jäkel, O. (2003). Wie Metaphern wissen schaffen. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.

Koller, V., & Farrelly, M. (2010). Darstellungen der Finanzkrise 2007/08 in den britischen Printmedien. Aptum: Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur, 6(2), 179-192.

Lakoff, G. (1991). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Peace Research, 25-32.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.

McGlone, M. S. (2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor?. Language & Communication, 27(2), 109-126.

Peltzer, A., Lämmle, K., & Wagenknecht, A. (2012). Krise, Cash und Kommunikation. Die Finanzkrise in den Medien. Konstanz, München: UVK.

Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213-241.

Steen, G. J. (2011). From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor.

Wengeler, M. (2010). „Noch nie zuvor “. Zur sprachlichen Konstruktion der Wirtschaftskrise 2008/2009 im SPIEGEL. Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur, 2, 138-156.

Wengeler, M., & Ziem, A. (2013). Sprachliche Konstruktionen von Krisen: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf ein fortwährend aktuelles Phänomen [Linguistic constructions of crisis: interdisciplinary perspectives on a continuously topical phenomenon]. Bremen: Ute Hampen.

White, M. (2004). Turbulence and turmoil in the market or the language of a financial crisis. Ibérica, (7).

Published

2018-03-31

How to Cite

Jurgaitis, N. (2018). Economic crisis as a supernatural being in public discourse. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(2), 66–71. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/109

Issue

Section

Research Articles