Toward socio-contextual perspective: A case in analyzing texts

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n2.1467

Authors

Keywords:

English, perspective, social context, text organization, text structure

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the social context, the text organization, and the text structure. The data that are analyzed in this study are taken from the book entitled Tales of Wisdom. There are two main texts are used in this study. The theory used was Halliday (1978) advocated placing the context of situation into a broader social context. The result of this study revealed that all of the elements of the context of situation (field, tenor, mode) were found in the texts. Both of the texts were well organized seen from the text organization including starting (orientation), content (complication), and ending (resolution).  In terms of text structure, the use of reference and conjunction were frequently occurred. Of the four sub conjunctions, only three sub conjunctions were appeared and additive is the most one of all. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akman, V. (2000). Rethinking context as a social construct. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 743-759. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00067-3

Bex, T. (1996). Variety in written English: texts in society: societies in text. Psychology Press.

Brown, G., Brown, G. D., Brown, G. R., Gillian, B., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge university press.

Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. (1994). On reporting reporting: the representation of speech in factual and factional narratives. Advances in written text analysis, 295-308.

Cheung, M. (2010). The globalization and localization of persuasive marketing communication: A cross-linguistic socio-cultural analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(2), 354-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.012

Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Rozelle. New South Wales: Primary English Teaching Association.

Fernandico, A.M.C. (2020). “The Cohesion of Prologue on the Hunger Games Trilogy: A Discourse Analysis”

Gagné, N. O. (2010). Reexamining the notion of negative face in the Japanese socio linguistic politeness of request. Language & Communication, 30(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.12.001

Gladhill, C. (2013). ”The Field, Tenor, Mode, framework for analysis”

Gregory, M., & Caroll, S. (1978). Language and situation. Languages and their social context.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean. In Foundations of language development (pp. 239-265). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-443701-2.50025-1

Halliday, M. A. K. (1976). Anti?languages. American Anthropologist, 78(3), 570-584. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1976.78.3.02a00050

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in english (No. 9). Routledge.

Halliday, T. (1978). Vanishing birds: their natural history and conservation. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Halliday, T. C. (1985). Knowledge mandates: collective influence by scientific, normative and syncretic professions. British Journal of Sociology, 421-447.

Hameed, H.T. (2008). Cohesion in Texts: A Discourse Analysis of a News Article in a Magazine. Al-Fatih journal, 4(37).

Hamman, (2006) “Context of Situation Contained in English Commercial Advertisement”

Imtihani, N. (2010). Genre analysis in the frame of systemic functional linguistics. Humaniora, 22(1), 86-93.

Leckie-Tarry, H. (1995). Language and context: A functional theory of register (d. birch, ed.). London: Pinter.

Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing discourse analysis. Penguin Books.

Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Reducing teacher burnout: A socio-contextual approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.003

Rahayu, B. (2015). An investigation of field, tenor and mode in Indonesian University students’ academic writing in English (Doctoral dissertation, Curtin University).

Ribawa, I. K. O. (2019, December). The Analysis Of Lexical Choice On Cigarette Advertisements. In Seminar Nasional Inovasi dalam Penelitian Sains, Teknologi dan Humaniora-InoBali (pp. 491-489).

Richards, J.C. (1990). Interchange English for International Communication. Cambridge University Press: London

Schiffrin, D. (1998). Approaches to discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 3(29), 355-359.

Wray, A., & Grace, G. W. (2007). The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua, 117(3), 543-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.005

Wulandari, D. N. A. (2011). Interpersonal Meaning of BarackObama’s Speech at University of Indonesia: The Study of Barack Obama’s Attitudes and Judgments towards Indonesia. A Final Project, English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Semarang State University.

Published

2021-03-30

How to Cite

Hidayanti, N. N. A. T. (2021). Toward socio-contextual perspective: A case in analyzing texts. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n2.1467

Issue

Section

Research Articles