The issue of expression of human wishes in language
Keywords:
anthropocentric paradigm, grammatical structure of wishes, lexical-grammatical units of wishes, linguistic expression of human desires, pragmatics, semantics of wishes, semantics, syntactic structure of wishes, wishesAbstract
This article deals with non-linguistic factors such as the expression of human desires in the Uzbek language, the anthropocentric nature of desires, how speakers perceive the world, personal experiences, language skills and knowledge, the age of the speakers, the psyche. The issue of connection with it also analyses the study of wish sentences in linguistics, especially in Uzbek linguistics, and raises current issues related to the study of these types of sentences.
Downloads
References
Abdulin, A.G. (2006) Ethical expressions in the modern Tatar literary language: Author's abstract. diss. ... Cand. philol. sciences. - Kazan.
Aglamova, M. (1966) Ways of expressing imperative and desirability in the Turkic languages: Author's abstract. diss. ... Cand. philol. Sciences. - Tashkent.
Alavutdinova ganievna, n. (2015). Place of professor ayyub gulomov in forming of morphological viewpoints in uzbek linguistics of xx century. Electronic turkish studies, 10(12).
Ali, K., Fatima, S., & Chandio, R. (2019). Stylistic Analysis of Charles Lamb’s Essay Dream Children-Reverie. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 5 (6), 68-77. https://doi. org/10.21744/ijllc. v5n6, 760.
Alpatov, Y. M. (1993). On the Anthropocentric and Systemcentric Approaches to Language. Questions of linguistics. 3, 15—26..
Bazarova, M.M. (2007) Linguistic features of speech units expressing the content of positive desires in the Uzbek language (based on prayers and speech etiquette): Philol. fan. nomz. … Diss. avtoref. - Tashkent.
Boldyrev, N.N. (2001) Anthropocentricity of language from the standpoint of different cultures // Proceedings of the III Intern. scientific. conf. "Philology and Culture". At 3 o'clock - Tambov. Part 1. - pp. 15-20.
Cameron, D., & Kulick, D. (2003). Introduction: Language and desire in theory and practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00047-2
Désiré, L., Boissy, A., & Veissier, I. (2002). Emotions in farm animals:: a new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology. Behavioural processes, 60(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00081-5
Ekasani, K. A. (2016). The analysis of english–indonesian exclamative clauses in the novel entitled the adventures of tom sawyer by mark twain and their indonesian version entitled petualangan tom sawyer translated by djokolelono. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(1), 16-28.
Fitrat, A. (2006) Selected works. An experiment on the rules of the Uzbek language. Second Book: Nahv. - Tashkent: Manaviyat. - 204 p.
Friederici, A. D. (1982). Syntactic and semantic processes in aphasic deficits: The availability of prepositions. Brain and Language, 15(2), 249-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(82)90059-1
Gadjieva, K.E. (1989) Linguistic aspect of speech etiquette of native speakers of Russian and Azerbaijani languages: Author's abstract. diss. Cand. philol. sciences. - Baku, 1989.
Gibbs Jr, R. W. (2003). Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain and language, 84(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00517-5
Gulomov, A. (1964) Verb. - Tashkent: UzFA Publishing House.
Gupta, N. (2007). A functionally graded syntactic foam material for high energy absorption under compression. Materials Letters, 61(4-5), 979-982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.06.033
Gusarenko, M. K. (2005). Diskursivnye raznovidnosti, perlokutivnaya pragmatika i propozitsionalnye kharakteristiki rechevogo akta pozhelaniya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [The discursive varieties, perlocutionary pragmatics and propositional characteristics of the speech act of wish in modern Russian]: abstract for PhD in philological sciences: 10.02. 01
Hojiev, A. (1973) Verb. - Tashkent: Fan.
Khudaybergenova, Z. (2020). Türkiye Türkçesi ve Özbek Türkçesindeki ek eylemler üzerine.
Komorova, D.F. (2005) Pragmalinguistic features of wishes in German and Russian: Diss.... Cand. philol. sciences. - Tomsk.
Kortenkamp, K. V., & Moore, C. F. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0205
Kravchenko, A. V. (2009). The experiential basis of speech and writing as different cognitive domains. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 527-548.
Kudaibergenova, D. T. (2019). Compartmentalized Ideology: Presidential Addresses and Legitimation in Kazakhstan. In Theorizing Central Asian Politics (pp. 145-166). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Leshchenko, O.I. (2014) Anthropocentricity as a universal principle of organizing the linguistic picture of the world // Svitoglyad - Philosophy - Religiya: collection of scientific works. Issue. 5. - pp. 171-179.
Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Saffran, E. M. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13(3), 361-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90015-X
Mahmudov, K. T., Gurbanov, A. V., Guseinov, F. I., & da Silva, M. F. C. G. (2019). Noncovalent interactions in metal complex catalysis. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 387, 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2019.02.011
Mahmudov, N & Nurmonov, A. (1995) Theoretical grammar of the Uzbek language. - Tashkent: Teacher.
Makhmudov, E. A., & Ashirova, E. A. (2019). Japan’s Practice in the Tourism Development of Uzbekistan. Journal of International and Advanced Japanese Studies, 11, 121-138.
Maslova, V. A. (2007). Homo Lingualis in Culture: Monograph. ?: Gnozis.
Masterskikh, S.V. (2004) Concept "desire" in a comparative plan (based on the verbal lexemes of the Russian, English and German languages): Avtoref. diss. Cand. philol. sciences. - Tyumen.
Rauch, E., Linder, C., & Dallasega, P. (2020). Anthropocentric perspective of production before and within Industry 4.0. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 105644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.018
Santiago-Avila, F. J., & Lynn, W. S. (2020). Bridging compassion and justice in conservation ethics. Biological Conservation, 248, 108648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108648
Shoabdurahmonov, S. M. (1980) Modern Uzbek literary language. Part 1. - Tashkent: Teacher.
Tursunov, U., Mukhtorov, J., Rahmatullaev S.H. (1992) Modern Uzbek literary language. - Tashkent: Teacher.
Uzbek grammar. Part 1. - Tashkent: Fan, 1975.
Vorkachev, S.T. (2001) Linguoculturology, linguistic personality, concept: the formation of an anthropocentric paradigm in linguistics // Philological sciences. - M. –? 1.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 International journal of linguistics, literature and culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture (IJLLC) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJLLC right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJLLC can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJLLC volumes 6 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
