Literary-aesthetic function of Turkic onomastic units in literary text

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n5.1929

Authors

  • Dilrabo R. Andaniyazova Scientific Researcher, Institute of Uzbek Language, Literature and Folklore of the Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

lingual poetics, literary text, onomastic unit, onomatopoetic, poetonim, proper nouns

Abstract

This article is devoted to the study of the role of onomastic units - name, surname, nickname in a literary text. The author substantiates the study of names as lingual poetic means that enhance the artistic value of a work. Thus, proper nouns are important Lingvo-poetic means serving for illustration of a particular literary aim of an author, besides executing a nominative function in the literary text. By means of selection of names in the literary texts, would it be a poetic work either a prosaic, one can evidence writer’s skills and culture in utilization of names. Purposefully utilization of popular (precedent) names peculiar to a particular nation does serve for the increment of literariness of a work. Generally, research of onomatopoetic, which learns the very issue, is one of the forthcoming and must-to-do tasks of linguistics, namely Uzbek linguistics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhmetshina, A. S., Akhmetshin, B. S., & Biktimirova, D. Z. (2021). Socialization Of Students: On The Problems Of Implementation Via Development Of A Linguistic Persona. International Research Journal, (5 (107) Part 3), 119-123.

Aksholakova, A. (2013). Students Speech Culture Development in the Sphere of Onomastics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 391-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.041

Atalay, B. (1924). Bektashism and its literature. Istanbul: Ant Publications.

Crutch, S. J., & Warrington, E. K. (2004). The semantic organisation of proper nouns: the case of people and brand names. Neuropsychologia, 42(5), 584-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.10.009

Fajardo, J. A. S., & Gonza?lez, F. R. (2018). Motivations and morphological variations in clipped personal names: A cross-linguistic approach. Lingua, 206, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.01.006

Fomin, ?. (2004). Literal onomastics in Russia: Conclusions and perspectives (???. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Edition, ?. Issues of onomastics. ? 1. ). Moscow, Russia.

Fonyakova, N. (2003). A depiction of one forgotten custom on a Khazar vessel from the Kotsky town. Art problems, (4), 45-48.

Gapparova, T. G. (2017). Pedagogical Terms for Achieving Effectiveness in Primary Education. Eastern European Scientific Journal, (2), 92-94.

Jappar, ?. (2000). Esthetic functions of proper nouns in prose of O.Suleymanov ??D. . Almaty.

Kalinkin, V. M. (2017). Proper Names in Dictionaries of “Writer's Language” Type as a Problem of Theoretical and Practical Lexicography. Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Series 9. Current Trends in Language Development, (15), 88-96.

Karimov, V. A., & Kamilov, I. K. (1967). Pharmacology of the new loline alkaloid and of its derivative. Published pursuant to an agreement with the US Department of Agriculture and the National Science Foundation by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations.

Kneepkens, E. W., & Zwaan, R. A. (1995). Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics, 23(1-2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00021-W

Koroliova, V., Grechenko, V., Kovalchuk, M., Samoilenko, V., Shevchenko, T., & Zaitseva, V. (2021). Information and communication activity of students when writing a course work on linguistics. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5n1.1062

Magazanik, A. B. (1978). Onomapoetics or “speaking” names in the literature”. Tashkent: Fan, 146.

Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics, 20(3), 193-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(91)90007-C

Mahmudov, N. (2015). Searching for complicated research of a language. Uzbek Language and Literature.

Mamatov, B. (2020). Labor Experience And Wages-Important Factors Determining The Size Of Pensions In The Future. International Finance and Accounting , 2020 (2), 4.

Nikonov, V. ?. (1974). Noun and Society. Moscow.

Ohnesorge, C., & Van Lancker, D. (2001). Cerebral laterality for famous proper nouns: Visual recognition by normal subjects. Brain and Language, 77(2), 135-165. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2365

Peniro, R. ., & Cyntas, J. . (2019). Applied linguistics theory and application. Linguistics and Culture Review, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v3n1.7

Podolskaya, N. V. (1988). Dictionary of Russian onomastic terminology. M.: Nauka, 125.

Qurbonov, ?. (2006). Research of toponyms in literal works: Issues and challenges. Issue of the Linguistic analysis and explanation of toponyms in imaginative literature. Samarqand.

Safarov, S. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. Jizzakh: Sangzor.

Sattarov, G. F. (1981). Tatar nsmneri suzlege. Kazan.

Schmidt, D., & Buchanan, L. (2004). Sparing of written production of proper nouns and dates in aphasia. Brain and cognition, 55(2), 406-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.061

Schraw, G. (1997). Situational interest in literary text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(4), 436-456. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0944

Solijonov, Y. M. (1984). Few functions of names in literal work. Uzbek Language and Literature.

Superanskaya, ?. (1973). The general theory of proper nouns. ?oskva.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1972). On the foundations of poetics: Methodological prolegomena to a generative grammar of literary texts. Poetics, 2(1), 89-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(72)90031-9

Vinogradov, S. N. (1963). The determination of self-association equilibrium constants by infrared absorption spectroscopy. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 41(10), 2719-2722.

Vinogradova, N. V. (2002). The proper noun in a literary text. ?wer: ??D.

Wagner, M., & McCurdy, K. (2010). Poetic rhyme reflects cross-linguistic differences in information structure. Cognition, 117(2), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.007

Yokubov, S. (1994). Onomastics of Navoi works. Tashkent: NDA.

Yuldashev, M. (2009). Lingvo-poetic analysis of the literary text. Dissertation for Doctorate of Liberal Arts.

Published

2021-09-22

How to Cite

Andaniyazova, D. R. (2021). Literary-aesthetic function of Turkic onomastic units in literary text. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(5), 356–361. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n5.1929

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 5: September 2021

Section

Research Articles
Copyright & Licensing

Copyright (c) 2021 International journal of linguistics, literature and culture

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Articles published in the International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture (IJLLC) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJLLC right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.

Articles published in IJLLC can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJLLC volumes 6 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.