Passive clauses argument structure of give verbs in corpus of contemporary American English (COCA)

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v8n3.2077

Authors

  • Ni Putu Anna Purna Dewika Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Nyoman Sedeng Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Novita Mulyana Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

argument structure, give verbs, grammatical relation, passive clause, semantic role

Abstract

This study is entitled Passive Clauses Argument Structure of Give Verbs in Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). It is concerned with the argument structure which is mapped to the grammatical relation. This study aimed to recognize the grammatical relations in passive clauses which have “give verbs”. This study is library research. The data of this study were taken from Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) which is concerned with passive clauses. To collect the data, the documentation method and note-taking technique were applied. The descriptive-qualitative method was applied in analyzing the data. The data were described and explained based on the theory argument structure and the theory of passive. Based on the analysis, the grammatical relation operated within passive clauses with the class of give verbs involves subject, object, and oblique. Verb feed, give, and pay in passive can be constructed with S-V, S-V-O, S-V-OBL, and S-V-O-OBL. However, the construction found with verb lease in passive is S-V and S-V-OBL. On the other hand, the possible construction found in verb lend in passive is S-V, S-V-OBL, and S-V-O.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Bickel, B., & Y?dava, Y. P. (2000). A fresh look at grammatical relations in Indo-Aryan. Lingua, 110(5), 343-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00048-0

Cahyadi, I. W. (2013). Semantic Role: A Case Grammar Approach in “The Minister’S Black Veil” (undergraduate theses). Journal of Arts and Humanities, Volume 5. No. 3.

Cohn, N., & Paczynski, M. (2013). Prediction, events, and the advantage of Agents: The processing of semantic roles in visual narrative. Cognitive Psychology, 67(3), 73-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.07.002

Fisher, C., Hall, D. G., Rakowitz, S., & Gleitman, L. (1994). When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth. Lingua, 92, 333-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(94)90346-8

Hornby, G., & Witte, C. (2010). Parent involvement in rural elementary schools in New Zealand: A survey. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(6), 771-777.

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. (2005). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 53(2), 193-194.

Kroeger, P. R. (2005). Analyzing grammar: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. University of Chicago press.

Lidz, J., & Gleitman, L. R. (2004). Argument structure and the child's contribution to language learning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(4), 157-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.005

Lim, S., Lee, C., & Ra, D. (2013). Dependency-based semantic role labeling using sequence labeling with a structural SVM. Pattern Recognition Letters, 34(6), 696-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2013.01.022

Marantz, A. (2013). Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua, 130, 152-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.012

Newton, J., & Kennedy, G. (1996). Effects of communication tasks on the grammatical relations marked by second language learners. System, 24(3), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(96)00024-3

Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and language, 39(4), 633-651. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2592

Pullum, G. K. (2014). Fear and loathing of the English passive. Language & Communication, 37, 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.08.009

Putrayasa, I. B. (2017). The semantic study of languages politics. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(2), 7-13.

Quirk, R. (2014). Grammatical and lexical variance in English. Routledge.

Suryasa, I. W. (2016). The roles played of semantic theory found in novel the moon that embracing the sun translation. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(1), 39-42.

Thompson, C. K. (2003). Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The argument structure complexity hypothesis. Journal of neurolinguistics, 16(2-3), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00014-3

Van Valin Jr, R. D. (2001). An introduction to syntax. Cambridge University Press.

Published

2022-04-13

How to Cite

Dewika, N. P. A. P., Sedeng, I. N., & Mulyana, N. (2022). Passive clauses argument structure of give verbs in corpus of contemporary American English (COCA). International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 8(3), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v8n3.2077

Issue

Section

Research Articles