Cultural shifting on agricultural Subak Abian in Jembrana Regency
Keywords:
agricultural culture, modernism, shifting, sociocultural, Subak AbianAbstract
The paper aims at discussing the shift in agricultural culture. Most Balinese people live in the agricultural sector. They have a variety of traditional knowledge and technology called rural knowledge. Knowledge and technology were used as a foundation by the community in carrying out various activities, including agricultural activities. For example, knowledge of ala-ayuning dewasa to start work in the fields. However, the implementation of the green revolution program by the New Order government, to ensure food availability for 111.8 million residents, from 1969-1974, shifted much of local wisdom value. This study used a qualitative analysis method with an interpretive approach. The results showed several factors that were causing the shift in agricultural culture in Subak Abian, Jembrana Regency, for example, modernism, ideological factors, Dutch colonialism influence, economic development orientation, science, and technology. The shifting process of agricultural culture tends to start from changes in aspects of material infrastructure, then affect of social structure, and ultimately also influence the ideological superstructure aspects. The implications of this shift are seen in social, economic, religious life, and community kinship system.
Downloads
References
Atmadja, N. B. (2010). Ajeg Bali: gerakan, identitas kultural, dan globalisasi. Penerbit & distribusi, LKiS.
Brunt, P., & Courtney, P. (1999). Host perceptions of sociocultural impacts. Annals of tourism Research, 26(3), 493-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00003-1
Burhanuddin Salam, H. (1988). logika Formal (filsafat berfikir). Bina aksara, Jakarta.
Chambers, R. (1983). Membangun Desa Mulai Dari Belakang. LP3ES. Jakarta.
Collyer, F. M. (1997). Technological invention: post-modernism and social structure. Technology in society, 19(2), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(96)00064-4
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1995. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Dharmika, I. B. (2019). Alih Fungsi Lahan dan Implikasinya Terhadap Eksistensi Agama dan Budaya di Bali. Dharmasmrti: Jurnal Ilmu Agama dan Kebudayaan, 10(2), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.32795/ds.v19i2.434
Dwipayana, A. A. (2001). Kelas dan kasta: pergulatan kelas menengah Bali. Lapera Pustaka Utama.
Eksl, R., & Métayer, G. (1986). Technical modernism and social conservatism: France's communications ‘illness’. Futures, 18(2), 258-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(86)90103-5
Elsevier
Foucault, M. (2019). Aesthetics, method, and epistemology: Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984. Penguin UK.
Friedman, S. (2012). Cultural omnivores or culturally homeless? Exploring the shifting cultural identities of the upwardly mobile. Poetics, 40(5), 467-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2012.07.001
Fulginiti, L. E., & Perrin, R. K. (1998). Agricultural productivity in developing countries. Agricultural economics, 19(1-2), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(98)00045-0
Geertz, C. (1977). Penjaja dan Raja Perubahan Sosial dan Modernisasi Ekonomi di Dua Kota Indonesia. (R, Soepomo, terj.). Jakarta: PT. gramedia.
Geertz, C. (2000). The interpretation of cultures. 1973. New York: Basic.
Goodman, M. K. (2010). The mirror of consumption: Celebritization, developmental consumption and the shifting cultural politics of fair trade. Geoforum, 41(1), 104-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.08.003
Gottlieb, N. H., & Chen, M. S. (1985). Sociocultural correlates of childhood sporting activities: their implications for heart health. Social science & medicine, 21(5), 533-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(85)90037-1
Griffin, D. R. (2005). Visi-Visi Postmodern; Spiritualitas dan Masyarakat. ter. A. Gunawan Admiranto. Yogyakarta.
Hatta, M. (1964). Pengantar ke djalan ilmu dan pengetahuan. Pembangunan.
Jamaludin, A. N. (2015). Agama & konflik sosial: studi kerukunan umat beragama, radikalisme, dan konflik antarumat beragama. Penerbit Pustaka Setia.
Krishnayana, I. P. A., Suparta, I. N., & Inggriati, N. W. T. (2019). Impact of application of law no 16/2006 about fisheries and forestry agricultural extension system toward to performance of agricultural extension workers. International Journal of Life Sciences, 3(2), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijls.v3n2.295
Maliki, Z. (1999). Penaklukan negara atas rakyat: studi resistensi petani berbasis religio, politik santri terhadap negaranisasi. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Martono, N. (2015). Metode penelitian sosial: konsep-konsep kunci. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Nelson, G. C. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on spatial analysis for agricultural economists. Agricultural Economics, 27(3), 197-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00116.x
Nurrochmat, D. (2005). Strategi pengelolaan hutan: Upaya menyelamatkan rimba yang tersisa. Pustaka Pelajar.
O’callaghan, J. R., Menzies, D. J., & Bailey, P. H. (1971). Digital simulation of agricultural drier performance. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 16(3), 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(71)80016-1
Piliang, Y. A. (2004). Posrealitas: realitas kebudayaan dalam era posmetafisika. Jalasutra.
Sadguna, D. N., Sulistiawati, N. P. A., & Astiari, N. K. A. (2017). Contributions of household income of farmers as palm crafts outside agriculture sector. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 3(5), 86-96.
Sanderson, S. K. (1993). Sosiologi makro: sebuah pendekatan terhadap realitas sosial. Penerjemah F. Widjidi dan S Menno). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Satori, D. A., & Komariah, A. (2009). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 22.
Sianipar, G. (2004). Mendefenisikan Pascakolonialisme: pengantar menuju wacana pemikiran pascakolonialisme. dalam Hermeneutika Pascakolonial: soal identitas. Editor Mudji Sutrisno dan Hendar Putranto. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta.
Suja, I. W. (1999). Tafsir Keliru terhadap Hindu, Tanggapan untuk Dr. A.G, Honig, J.R. Denpasar: Yayasan Dharma Naradha.
Suriasumantri, J. S. (1997). Ilmu dalam perspektif: Sebuah kumpulan karangan tentang hakekat ilmu. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Sutopo, H. B. (2006). Penelitian kualitatif: Dasar teori dan terapannya dalam penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Takwin, B. (2003). Akar-akar ideologi: pengantar kajian konsep ideologi dari Plato hingga Bourdieu. Jalasutra.
Taylor, E. B. (1991). A review of local adaptation in Salmonidac, with particular reference to Pacific and Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture, 98(1-3), 185-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(91)90383-I
Ward, C., & Kennedy, A. (1999). The measurement of sociocultural adaptation. International journal of intercultural relations, 23(4), 659-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00014-0
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Articles published in the International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture (IJLLC) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJLLC right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJLLC can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJLLC volumes 6 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
