Development performance of economic growth typology in Southeast Sulawesi province

https://doi.org/10.31295/ijbem.v4n1.1542

Authors

  • Yohanes Boni Department of Economic and Development Studies, Halu Oleo University, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Zamrun Firihu Department of Physics, Halu Oleo University, Indonesia
  • H. Pasrun Adam Department of Matematics, Halu Oleo University, Indonesia
  • Rahmat Sewa Suraya Department of Oral Tradition Halu Oleo University, Indonesia
  • Herdiansyah Department of Economic and Development Studies, Halu Oleo University, Indonesia

Keywords:

advanced and developing, basic sector, development, economic growth, performance

Abstract

This research was conducted in Southeast Sulawesi Province in 2020. The purpose of this study was to determine the economic base sector as a leading sector, to determine the effect of national economic growth on economic growth in Southeast Sulawesi, and to determine advanced and fast-growing sectors, and advanced but depressed sectors in Southeast Sulawesi. Southeast Sulawesi Province. The results of the analysis show: (1) Location Quotien (LQ) analysis of the basic sectors as the leading sectors are: (a) Agriculture, forestry and fisheries sectors LQ of 1.83 or LQ> 1. (b) The mining and quarrying sector LQ is 2.65 or LQ> 1. (c) The sector of water management, waste management, waste management and recycling of LQ is 2.65 or LQ> 1. (d) The construction sector LQ is 1.30 or LQ> 1. (e) The transportation and warehousing sector is LQ 1.13 or LQ> 1. (f) Government administration, defense and social security sectors LQ 1.54 or LQ> 1. (g) Education services sector LQ of 1.53 or LQ> 1.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Ramos, A., & Guitar, S. (2012). Revisiting incubation performance: How incubator typology affects results. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 888-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.12.003

Bathelt, H., Kogler, D. F., & Munro, A. K. (2010). A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development. Technovation, 30(9-10), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.04.003

Domenech, T., Bleischwitz, R., Doranova, A., Panayotopoulos, D., & Roman, L. (2019). Mapping Industrial Symbiosis Development in Europe_ typologies of networks, characteristics, performance and contribution to the Circular Economy. Resources, conservation and recycling, 141, 76-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.016

Dong, Y., Wang, X., Jin, J., Qiao, Y., & Shi, L. (2014). Effects of eco-innovation typology on its performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese enterprises. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 34, 78-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.11.001

Emilia del Pino, M., Rosado, R. H., Azuela, A., Guzmán, G., Argüelles, D., Rodríguez, C., & Rosado, G. M. (2006). Effect of controlled volumetric tissue heating with radiofrequency on cellulite and the subcutaneous tissue of the buttocks and thighs. Journal of drugs in dermatology: JDD, 5(8), 714-722.

Faucheux, S., & Nicolaï, I. (2011). IT for green and green IT: A proposed typology of eco-innovation. Ecological economics, 70(11), 2020-2027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.019

Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research policy, 36(3), 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003

Heriyanto, M., Yusri, A., Muchid, M., & Wirawan, B. A. (2020). Tenure Amnesty for the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry in the Forest Area. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 7(5), 160-170.

Lopez-Carreiro, I., & Monzon, A. (2018). Evaluating sustainability and innovation of mobility patterns in Spanish cities. Analysis by size and urban typology. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 684-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.029

Park, S., & Bae, Z. T. (2004). New venture strategies in a developing country: Identifying a typology and examining growth patterns through case studies. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00110-6

Roscoe, S., Cousins, P. D., & Lamming, R. C. (2016). Developing eco-innovations: A three-stage typology of supply networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1948-1959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.125

Schumann, J. H., Wünderlich, N. V., & Wangenheim, F. (2012). Technology mediation in service delivery: A new typology and an agenda for managers and academics. Technovation, 32(2), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.10.002

Tarigan, R. (2005). An evaluation of the relationship between alignment of strategic priorities and manufacturing performance. International Journal of Management, 22(4), 586.

Published

2021-05-25

How to Cite

Boni, Y., Firihu, M. Z., Adam, H. P., Suraya, R. S., & Herdiansyah, H. (2021). Development performance of economic growth typology in Southeast Sulawesi province. International Journal of Business, Economics & Management, 4(1), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijbem.v4n1.1542