Perceptions of superiors’ reputations and subordinates’ honesty moderates effect of budget participation on budgetary slack

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v5n3.1936

Authors

  • Putu Ayu Putri Ginanti Faculty of Economics and Business, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia
  • Anak Agung Gde Putu Widanaputra Faculty of Economics and Business, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia

Keywords:

budget participation, budgetary slack, honesty subordinate, perception reputation superiors

Abstract

This study aims to provide empirical evidence regarding perceptions of superior reputation and subordinate honesty in weakening the effect of budgetary participation on budgetary slack. The data in this study were collected using a questionnaire. The population in this study is the Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah of Tabanan Regency with a sample of Echelon III and Echelon IV officials involved in budgeting. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling and obtained a sample of 199 respondents. The analysis technique in this study is Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) using SPSS version 25 program. The results of the regression analysis state that the perception of superior reputation weakens the relationship between budgetary participation and budgetary slack. This means that the higher the level of perception of subordinates on the reputation of their superiors, the tendency for budgetary slack to occur will be lower. The results of the regression analysis also state that the honesty of subordinates weakens the relationship between budgetary participation and budgetary slack. This means that the higher the level of honesty of subordinates, the tendency for budgetary slack to occur will be lower. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altenburger, M. (2021). Mood and honesty in budget reporting. Management Accounting Research, 50, 100707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2020.100707

Baiman, S. (1990). Agency research in management accounting: A second look. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(4), 341-371.

Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning: Theory. In New York: General Learning Press (pp. 1–46).

Blay, A., Douthit, J., & Fulmer III, B. (2019). Why don't people lie? Negative affect intensity and preferences for honesty in budgetary reporting. Management Accounting Research, 42, 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2018.05.001

Brink, A. G., Coats, J. C., & Rankin, F. W. (2018). Who’s the boss? The economic and behavioral implications of various characterizations of the superior in participative budgeting research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 41, 89–105.

Brownell, P. (1982). A field study examination of budgetary participation and locus of control. Accounting Review, 766-777.

Brunner, M., & Ostermaier, A. (2017). Sabotage in Capital Budgeting: The Effects of Control and Honesty on Investment Decisions. European Accounting Review, 28(1), 1–30.

Carolina, Y. (2020). Participative Budgeting, Employee Motivation and Budgetary Slack in Private Sector in Indonesia. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 12(2), 346–356.

Chong, V. K., & Ferdiansah, I. (2011). The effect of trust-in-superior and truthfulness on budgetary slack: An experimental investigation. In Advances in Management Accounting (Vol. 19, pp. 55-73). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Chong, V. K., & Loy, C. Y. (2015). The effect of a leader’s reputation on budgetary slack. In Advances in Management Accounting. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Church, B. K., Kuang, X. J., & Liu, Y. S. (2019). The effects of measurement basis and slack benefits on honesty in budget reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 72, 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.005

Daumoser, C., Hirsch, B., & Sohn, M. (2018). Honesty in budgeting: a review of morality and control aspects in the budgetary slack literature. Journal of Management Control, 29(2), 115-159.

Douthit, J. D., & Stevens, D. E. (2015). The robustness of honesty effects on budget proposals when the superior has rejection authority. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 467-493.

Febriati, & Yunita, D. R. (2021). Leader’s Reputation and Budgetary Slack: The Role of Truthfulness of Subordinate. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(3), 445–458.

Gago-Rodríguez, S., & Naranjo-Gil, D. (2016). Effects of trust and distrust on effort and budgetary slack: an experiment. Management Decision.

Ghozali, I. (2020). 25 Grand Theory: Teori Besar Ilmu Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Bisnis. Semarang: Yoga Pratama.

Govindarajan, V. (1986). Impact of Participation in the Budgetary Process on Managerial Attitudes and Performance: Universalistic and Contingency Perspectives. Decision Sciences, 17, 496–516.

Kahar, S. H., Rohman, A., & Chariri, A. (2016). Participative budgeting, budgetary slack and job satisfaction in the public sector. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 32(6), 1663-1674.

Maiga, A. S., & Jacobs, F. A. (2007). The moderating effect of manager's ethical judgment on the relationship between budget participation and budget slack. Advances in Accounting, 23, 113-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6110(07)23005-6

Mardhiana, M. D. (2018). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran terhadap Budgetary Slack dengan Self Esteem sebagai Variabel Moderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 22(1), 521–543.

Merchant, K. A. (1985). Budgeting and the propensity to create budgetary slack. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(85)90016-9

Mia, L. (1988). Managerial attitude, motivation and the effectiveness of budget participation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(5), 465-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90017-7

Netra, I. B. W., & Damayanthi, I. G. A. E. (2017). Pengaruh Karakter Personal, Reputasi, dan Self Esteem Terhadap Senjangan Anggaran. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 19(2), 1406–1435.

Ngo, Q. H., & Huynh, T. N. (2017). A Study on Managers' Creation of Budgetary Slack in Emerging Economies: The Case of Vietnam. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 2(2), 15-28.

Nouri, H. (1994). Using organizational commitment and job involment to predict budgetary slack: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(3), 289-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90036-1

Nouri, H., & Parker, R. J. (1998). The relationship between budget participation and job performance: the roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment. Accounting, Organizations and society, 23(5-6), 467-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00036-6

Novitasari, N., & Wirama, D. G. (2016). Pengaruh Pengendalian Anggaran pada Senjangan Anggaran dan Orientasi Jangka Pendek Manajer. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 15(3), 2024–2051.

O'Connor, N. G. (1995). The influence of organizational culture on the usefulness of budget participation by Singaporean-Chinese managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(5), 383-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)00034-S

Prawita, W., & Wirasedana, I. W. P. (2017). Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Pada Kesenjangan Anggaran. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 19(1), 280–310.

Pundarika, I. G. P., & Dwirandra, A. A. N. . (2019). The Effect of Budget Participation on Budgetary Slack with Organizational Commitments and Love of Money as Moderation. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 8(2), 491–496.

Pusporini, I. D., Haryadi, & Herwiyanti, E. (2018). The effect of budget participation on budgetary slack with information asymmetry and organizational commitment as a moderating variable. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management (JRBEM), 12(1), 2261–2269.

Putri, P. A. A., & Wirama, D. G. (2016). Karakteristik Personal sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Penganggaran Partisipatif dan Keterlibatan Kerja pada Senjangan Anggaran. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 17(1), 715-742.

Rahmawati, A. I. E. (2019). Pengaruh Kejujuran Rekan Dan Penghargaan Non Moneter Pada Senjangan Anggaran (The Effect of Peer Honesty and Non-Monetary Awards on the Budgetary Slack). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 16(1), 17–34.

Rahmawati, A. I. E. (2020). Pengaruh Reputasi Pimpinan Pada Senjangan Anggaran dan Kepercayaan Diri Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 20(2), 132–144.

Rifqi, R. A., Subekti, I., & Rahman, A. F. (2017). The Effect of Budget Participation to Budgetary Slack With External Pressure as Moderating Variable. Journal of Accounting and Business Education, 2(1), 178–201.

Romario, F. D., Putri, I. G. A. M. A. D., Badera, I. D. N., & Putra, I. N. W. A. (2019). Effect of budget participation towards regional government managerial performance. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(3), 101-107. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n3.638

Shim, J. K., Siegel, J. G., & Shim, A. I. (2011). Budgeting basics and beyond (Vol. 574). John Wiley & Sons.

Suherman, I. P. W. N. P., & Dewi, L. G. K. (2019). Kompensasi Memoderasi Pengaruh Partisipasi Penganggaran Pada Budgetary Slack. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 27(3), 2460–2486.

Sukayana, G. A., & Putri, I. A. D. (2019). Tri hita karana culture and organizational commitments moderate: effect of participation on budgetary slack. International research journal of management, IT and social sciences, 6(4), 180-188.

Webb, R. A. (2002). The impact of reputation and variance investigations on the creation of budget slack. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(4-5), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00034-4

Widanaputra, A. A., & Mimba, N. P. S. H. (2014). The Influence of Participative Budgeting on Budgetary Slack in Composing Local Governments’ Budget in Bali Province. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 391–396.

Wiersma, E. (2017). How and when do firms translate slack into better performance? The British Accounting Review, 49(5), 1–15.

Wu, C. X., & Wolford, S. (2018). Leaders, states, and reputations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(10), 2087-2117.

Published

2022-08-10

How to Cite

Ginanti, P. A. P., & Widanaputra, A. A. G. P. (2022). Perceptions of superiors’ reputations and subordinates’ honesty moderates effect of budget participation on budgetary slack. International Journal of Business, Economics & Management, 5(3), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v5n3.1936