Age-appropriate, pragmatic content in personal correspondence
Keywords:
communicative purpose, dialecticism, linguistic expertise, non-literary element, pragmatic contentAbstract
This article examines vulgarism and dialectisms, which are considered to be elements of vulgarity in personal correspondence. In the linguistic examination conducted in anonymous cases, the form, frequency, and pragmatic content of the use of non-literary elements also play a leading role in determining the age of a person. The article examines the pragmatic direction, communicative purpose, frequency of use of non-literary elements in the correspondence of individuals aged 17-27 on average, and concludes. A survey was also conducted among school-age students to study the influence of the family environment on the use of non-literal lexical elements in a child’s speech. The nature of the use of non-verbal elements in personal correspondence depends on neurological, psychological, and sociological factors. Unethical behavior can also be related to a person's emotional state. Some personal correspondence uses obscene lexical elements, some positive and some negative. Speech situation and communicative purpose also played an important role in the use of non-literary lexical items.
Downloads
References
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive psychology, 17(4), 391-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90014-3
Emelyanova, O. N. (2003). Extra-literary vocabulary. In Stylistic Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Russian Language (pp. 33-36).
Giora, R. (1999). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of pragmatics, 31(7), 919-929. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00100-3
Helland, W. A., Lundervold, A. J., Heimann, M., & Posserud, M. B. (2014). Stable associations between behavioral problems and language impairments across childhood–The importance of pragmatic language problems. Research in developmental disabilities, 35(5), 943-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.02.016
Jing, F. (2017). Investigating intentionality of linguistic landscapes from the multilingual commercial signs. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(5), 46-52. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/222
Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness:: Current research issues. Journal of pragmatics, 14(2), 193-218.
Korovushkin, VP (2005). Osnovi kontrastyvnoi sociolektolohii [Basics of contrastive sociolectology].
László, J. (1990). Images of social categories vs. images of literary and non-literary objects. Poetics, 19(3), 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(90)90024-Y
Likhachev, D.S. (1935). Features of the primitive primitivism of thieves' speech .
Marie, C., Kujala, T., & Besson, M. (2012). Musical and linguistic expertise influence pre-attentive and attentive processing of non-speech sounds. Cortex, 48(4), 447-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.006
McDonald, S. (1993). Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain and language, 44(1), 28-46. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1993.1003
Meiser, T., Klauer, K. C., & Naumer, B. (2001). Propositional reasoning and working memory: The role of prior training and pragmatic content. Acta Psychologica, 106(3), 303-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00055-X
Musulmonova, K. (2021). The content of the stages of analysis of linguistic expertise. Society and Innovation, 2 (1 / S), 227-232.
Musulmonova, K. (2021). The Process Of Linguistic Examination On Anonymous Letters. Zbírnik naukovix prats SCIENTIA .
Pratiwi, V. U., & Rohmadi, M. (2021). Pragmatic approach to Indonesian speaking skills for student vocational high schools. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(4), 263-273. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n4.1795
Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for specific purposes, 13(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
Schmidt, S. J. (1980). Fictionality in literary and non-literary discourse. Poetics, 9(5-6), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(80)90005-4
Skovorodnikov, A.P. (2014). Effective verbal communication (basic competencies).
Snedeker, J., Geren, J., & Shafto, C. L. (2012). Disentangling the effects of cognitive development and linguistic expertise: A longitudinal study of the acquisition of English in internationally-adopted children. Cognitive Psychology, 65(1), 39-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.01.004
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International journal of linguistics, literature and culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture (IJLLC) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJLLC right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJLLC can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJLLC volumes 6 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
