Anthropolinguistics analysis on vocabulary of agricultural tools and activities in the Kuala dialect of Banjarese

Muhammad Rafiek; Jumadi Jumadi; Faradina Faradina; Raudhatun Nisa

doi:10.21744/ijllc.v9n1.2248

Authors

Muhammad Rafiek
rfk2073@gmail.com
Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
Jumadi Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
Faradina Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
Raudhatun Nisa MTsN 1 Banjarmasin, Indonesisa

Keywords:

Activity, Agriculture, Kuala Dialect of Banjarese, Tools, Vocabulary

Abstract

This research is a preliminary study on vocabulary of agricultural tools and activities in the Kuala dialect of Banjarese using an anthropolinguistics approach. This study aims to describe and explain anthropolinguistics analysis of the vocabulary of agricultural tools and activities in the Kuala dialect of Banjarese. The anthropolinguistics research method from Danesi (2004) is utilized in this research. The data analysis technique uses semantic analysis techniques in anthropolinguistics. There are some findings in this study, they are: (1)Vocabulary of agricultural tools and the activities of sabalum batanam (prabatanam) in the Kuala dialect of Banjarese, (2) Vocabulary of agricultural tools and activities of wayah batanam (planting time) in the Kuala dialect of Banjarese, (3)Vocabulary of tools and farming activities of wayah mangatam (harvesting time) in the Kuala dialect of Banjarese, (4) Vocabulary of tools and activities of mangatam (post-harvest) in the Kuala dialect of Banjarese, and (5) Activity vocabulary related to the tradition of limbah tuntung maulah banih becomes baras (after processing paddy grains becoming rice) and mahadang musim batanam (waiting for planting) in the Kuala dialect of Banjarese. The pedagogical research implications are very useful for the development of teaching materials for agricultural vocabulary with local content in Banjarese.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Auwal, T. M. R. (2017). Reluctance of Acehnese youth to use Acehnese. Studies in English language and education, 4(1), 1-14.

Aziz, Z. A., & Amery, R. (2016). The effects of a linguistic tsunami on the languages of Aceh. Studies in English Language and Education, 3(2), 100-108.

Brent, M. R., & Siskind, J. M. (2001). The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development. Cognition, 81(2), B33-B44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00122-6

Budhiono, R. H. (2017). Leksikon alat dan aktivitas bertanam padi dalam bahasa Jawa. Kandai, 13(2), 235-248.

Danesi, M. (2004). Messages, signs, and meanings: A basic textbook in semiotics and communication (Vol. 1). Canadian Scholars’ Press.

Dewi, I., Syuaib, M. F., & Mandang, T. (2011). Studi Ergonomi Pada Penyiapan Lahan Sawah Lebak Menggunakan Alat Tradisional Tajak di Kabupaten Banjar Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Keteknikan Pertanian, 25(2).

Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press.

Effendi, R. (2011). A cultural meaning of agricultural terminologies: a case of limpasu sub-district in indonesia. Man In India.

Gerakis, A., & Kalburtji, K. (1998). Agricultural activities affecting the functions and values of Ramsar wetland sites of Greece. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 70(2-3), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00119-4

Hapip, A. D. (1981). Struktur Bahasa Banjar Kuala. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Hastuti, T. K., & Yuliati, U. (2017). A model for mangrove forest management based on community empowerment in Bantul Regency. Journal of Environmental Management & Tourism, 8(6 (22)), 1232-1237.

Huang, Y. M., Huang, Y. M., Huang, S. H., & Lin, Y. T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58(1), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.008

Kostencki, P., Stawicki, T., & Królicka, A. (2021). Wear of the working parts of agricultural tools in the context of the mass of chemical elements introduced into soil during its cultivation. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 9(2), 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.11.001

Kraljic, T., Brennan, S. E., & Samuel, A. G. (2008). Accommodating variation: Dialects, idiolects, and speech processing. Cognition, 107(1), 54-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.013

Lubis, R. R., Irwanto, I., & Harahap, M. Y. (2019). Increasing learning outcomes and ability critical thinking of students through application problem based learning strategies. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(6), 524-527.

Moghadam, S. H., Zainal, Z., & Ghaderpour, M. (2012). A review on the important role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 555-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.300

Oliver, Y. M., Robertson, M. J., & Wong, M. T. F. (2010). Integrating farmer knowledge, precision agriculture tools, and crop simulation modelling to evaluate management options for poor-performing patches in cropping fields. European Journal of Agronomy, 32(1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.05.002

Rosidin, O., & Muhyidin, A. (2021). Khazanah Leksikon Agrikultura Dalam Lingkup Budaya Masyarakat Di Kecamatan Sumur Kabupaten Pandeglang: Perspektif Ekolinguistik. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sastra, Lingua, Dan Pembelajarannya (Salinga) (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Salamiah, S., & Wahdah, R. (2015). The utilization of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) in controlling local rice tungro diseases in South Kalimantan. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Masyarakat Biodiversitas Indonesia (Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 1448-1456).

Septiana, D. (2018). Proses Morfologis Verba Bahasa Waringin (Morphological Process of Verb in Waringin Language). Kandai, 14(2), 287-302.

Stokhof, W. A. L., & Almanar, A. E. (1986). Holle lists, vocabularies in languages of Indonesia, Vol. 8: Kalimantan (Borneo). Dept. of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.

Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of memory and language, 60(4), 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.001

Suryadikara, F. dkk. 1981. Geografi Dialek Bahasa Banjar Hulu. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan.

Suryasa, W., & Dewi, A. A. S. C. (2018). Language maintenance of Balinese vocabulary in agriculture: Eco linguistic studies. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(4), 38-43.

Suyanto, S. (2019). Flipping onsets to enhance syllabification. International Journal of Speech Technology, 22(4), 1031-1038.

Toribio, A. J. (2000). Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish. Lingua, 110(5), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00044-3

Ulfa, M., Isda, I. D., & Purwati, P. (2018). The shift of Acehnese language: A sociolinguistic study to preserve regional languages. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 161-174.

Wahdah, R., Rusmayadi, G., & Zulhidiani, R. (2016). Performing of agronomic characters of M6 of local rice mutant lines of South Kalimantan. International Journal of Biosciences, 9(6), 114-124.

Yanti, N. D., Lumley, S., & Rumley, D. (2003). Farming systems in swampland ecosystems: a case study in South Borneo, Indonesia (No. 414-2016-26062).

Zia, H., Harris, N. R., Merrett, G. V., Rivers, M., & Coles, N. (2013). The impact of agricultural activities on water quality: A case for collaborative catchment-scale management using integrated wireless sensor networks. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 96, 126-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2013.05.001