Critical discourse study of youth texts in Sasak Language

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v9n4.2338

Authors

  • Irma Setiawan Muhammadiyah University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia
  • Sapiin University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia

Keywords:

conversation, Sasak language, gender perspective, Norman Fairclough’s model of critical discourse

Abstract

The conversation is often used as a medium to transfer the ideology of the speakers. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to: describe the representation of the role of Sasak men or women in vocabulary choices, in carrying out interactional control, in syntactic structures, and the use of metaphors in Sasak conversation. The theory used is the critical discourse theory model of Norman Fairclough and is complemented by Teun A. Van Dijk's theory. The collection was carried out using the listening and speaking method (interviews) as well as basic techniques and their derivatives, observation methods, and documentation methods. Sources of data were obtained from young Sasak youths and women who were communicating. The collected data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive method which aims to make a systematic description, categorization, and patterning. Data is presented formally and informally. In the end, this research resulted in the reality of the motives or ideology of the communicator's attitude that sided with the role of Sasak men or women in a gender perspective, which often led to physical-psychological intersections, such as; sexual harassment, domestic violence, and even in the culture of divorce and marriage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aimansyah, A., Setiawan, I., & Mandala, H. (2021, September). Analisis Kesalahan Afiksasi: Studi Kasus Pada Teks Tugas Akhir Mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia Di Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram. In Seminar Nasional Paedagoria (Vol. 1, pp. 137-145).

Bakri, B. (2017). Analisis percakapan bahasa sasak dalam perspektif gender: sebuah kajian wacana kritis. Aksara, 28(1), 91-102.

Biria, R., & Mohammadi, A. (2012). The socio pragmatic functions of inaugural speech: A critical discourse analysis approach. Journal of pragmatics, 44(10), 1290-1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.013

Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis wacana: pengantar analisis teks media. LKiS Yogyakarta.

Fairclough, N. (2019). Discourse and Social Changes (Revision). Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (2020). Language and Power (Revision). Longman.

Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy?. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(1), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.016

Hardiyanti, R. L. P., & Herda, R. K. (2023). Teaching vocabulary using flash cards in Indonesian ESP Classroom: A one-shot case study. JELITA: Journal of Education, Language Innovation, and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 1-11.

Harvey, L. (2017). Language learning motivation as ideological becoming. System, 65, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.009

Jones, P. E. (2007). Why there is no such thing as “critical discourse analysis”. Language & communication, 27(4), 337-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.08.001

Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. J. (2007). Analisis wacana: teori & metode. Pustaka Pelajar.

Kaur, P., & Raman, A. (2014). Exploring native speaker and non-native speaker accents: The English as a Lingua Franca perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 253-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.288

Listo, R. (2018). Gender myths in energy poverty literature: a critical discourse analysis. Energy Research & Social Science, 38, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.010

Mahsun, M. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Tahapan, Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Rajawali Press.

Setiawan, I. (2013). Analisis Percakapan Bahasa Sasak dalam Perspektif Gender: sebuah Kajian Wacana Kritis. Mabasan, 7(1), 24-35.

Setiawan, I. (2015). Social dialect variations in sasak monolingual society. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 1(1), 1–8. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/ijllc/article/view/54

Setiawan, I. (2019). Leksikon Gender Bahasa Sasak: Analisis Semantik Komponensial. Salingka, 16(2), 143-155.

Setiawan, I. (2022). Language Kinship as Regional Conflict Resolution in West Nusa Tenggara Comparative Historical Linguistic Study. Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 4(1), 82-100.

Setiawan, I., & Sukri, M. (2014). Kajian Linguistik Fungsional Sistemik Pada Pemberitaan Kekerasan Gender dalam Media Cetak Lombok Post Dan Relevansinya Terhadap Pembelajaran Wacana di Perguruan Tinggi. MABASAN, 8(1), 48-67.

Setiawan, I., Nurmiwati, N., & Oktaviani, F. S. (2023). Transitivity of President Jokowi's Speech Text at the G20 Event: Systemic Functional Linguistics Study. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 151-168.

Siegel, J. (2006). Language ideologies and the education of speakers of marginalized language varieties: Adopting a critical awareness approach. Linguistics and Education, 17(2), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.08.002

Sobur, A. (2001). Analisis teks media: suatu pengantar untuk analisis wacana, analisis semiotik dan analisis framing. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Stivers, T. (2010). An overview of the question–response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2772-2781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011

Sudaryanto, S. (2018). Tiga Fase Perkembangan Bahasa Indonesia (1928— 2009): Kajian Linguistik Historis. Aksis: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(1), 1-16.

Sukenti, K., Hakim, L., Indriyani, S., Purwanto, Y., & Matthews, P. J. (2016). Ethnobotanical study on local cuisine of the Sasak tribe in Lombok Island, Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 3(3), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2016.08.002

Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2(1), 62-86.

van Dijk, T. A. (2021). Ideology: Multidisciplinary Approaches. Sage Publications Inc.

Wouk, F. (2006). The language of apologizing in Lombok, Indonesia. Journal of pragmatics, 38(9), 1457-1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.011

Published

2023-06-22

How to Cite

Setiawan, I., & Sapiin, S. (2023). Critical discourse study of youth texts in Sasak Language. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 9(4), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v9n4.2338

Issue

Section

Research Articles