Argument structure and semantic role analysis of English speech act verb order

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v10n3.2431

Authors

  • Ni Putu Ayu Pujiyani Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Ni Luh Sutjiati Beratha Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Nengah Sudipa Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Ni Wayan Sukarini Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

English speech act verb, semantic role, semantic, structure argument, verb order

Abstract

This study is qualitative descriptive research that examines the English speech act verb “order” in English. The purpose of this study is to analyse the argument structure and its role in semantics. The type of data used in this study is secondary data sourced from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). The research instrument utilized in this study is a human instrument supported by hardware such as a computer, along with software such as Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel, as well as note-taking tools like pen and paper. Data for this study was collected using the corpus linguistics method and observation methods with note-taking techniques. The data were analysed by using the macro role theory by van Vallin & Lapolla (1997). The study results indicate that the verb "order" can have two arguments, the actor argument and the undergoer argument, and each argument can have its semantic role. The actor argument can entail the semantic role of the agent, while the undergoer argument can entail the semantic role of the theme.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alsina, A. (2001). On the nonsemantic nature of argument structure. Language Sciences, 23(4-5), 355-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00030-9

Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Harvard university press.

Brown, K. (2009). Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics. Elsevier.

Cohn, N., Paczynski, M., & Kutas, M. (2017). Not so secret agents: Event-related potentials to semantic roles in visual event comprehension. Brain and Cognition, 119, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2017.09.001

Foley, W. A., & Van Valin Jr, R. (1984). Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ.

Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hale, K., & Keyser, S. J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. MIT press.

Hartsuiker, R. J., & Westenberg, C. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75(2), B27-B39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00080-3

Hashem, Z. A., & Muhi, T. H. (2021). Semantic deviation in Arabic and English proverbs of love. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(3), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n3.1486

Hung, S. H., Lin, C. H., & Hong, J. S. (2010). Web mining for event-based commonsense knowledge using lexico-syntactic pattern matching and semantic role labeling. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1), 341-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.060

Leydesdorff, L., & Welbers, K. (2011). The semantic mapping of words and co-words in contexts. Journal of informetrics, 5(3), 469-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.008

Luzondo-Oyón, A., & de Mendoza-Ibáñez, F. J. R. (2015). Argument structure constructions in a Natural Language Processing environment. Language Sciences, 48, 70-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.01.001

Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20(1), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.08.001

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational researcher, 13(5), 20-30.

Roșu, G., & Șerbănută, T. F. (2010). An overview of the K semantic framework. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, 79(6), 397-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlap.2010.03.012

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.

Tantucci, V., & Wang, A. (2018). Illocutional concurrences: The case of evaluative speech acts and face-work in spoken Mandarin and American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 138, 60-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.014

Trosborg, A. (1995). Statutes and contracts: An analysis of legal speech acts in the English language of the law. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00034-C

Van Valin Jr, R. D. (2001). An Introduction to Syntax. Cambridge University Press.

Van Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge University Press.

Wierzbicka, A. (1987). English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. (No Title).

Published

2024-05-15

How to Cite

Pujiyani, N. P. A., Beratha, N. L. S., Sudipa, I. N., & Sukarini, N. W. (2024). Argument structure and semantic role analysis of English speech act verb order. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 10(3), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v10n3.2431

Issue

Section

Research Articles