The language of American political discourse: Aristotle's rhetorical appeals as manifested in Bush's and Obama's speeches on the war on terror

  • Iman Raissouni Department of English, King Fahd School of Translation, Abdelmalek Essaadi University (UAE), Morocco
Keywords: Aristotle, critical discourse analysis, persuasion, political discourse, rhetoric

Abstract

This article employs critical discourse analysis to analyze the representation of the “war on terror” in the political speeches of Presidents George Bush and Barack Obama in the decade following 9/11; it examines Aristotle's approach into the study of the language of persuasion through his three main rhetorical appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos, identifying several strands of the war on terror discourse and analyzing the way they influence the persuasiveness of the speeches and therefore the ability to generate public debate. The findings show substantial similarities in representation patterns among the two presidents' discourses and end up to the conclusion that the language of the war on terror is not simply a neutral or objective reflection of policy debates of terrorism and counterterrorism; rather, it is a carefully and deliberately constructed public discourse designed to make the war on terror look reasonable and morally justified.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersson, I. (2005). American political rhetoric: a study of selected speeches by George W. Bush.

Atkinson, M. (1984). Our masters' voices: The language and body language of politics. Psychology Press.

Bush, G. W. (2001). Address to the Joint Session of the 107th Congress. Selected Speeches of President George W. Bush, 2008.

Bush, G. W. (2003). Bush Declares War against Iraq. White House, Oval Office, Thursday, March 19th.

Bush, L. (2001). Radio Address by Mrs. Bush, Crawford, Texas. White House Archives, 17.

Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2005). Politicians and Rhetoric: the Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & society, 10(2), 149-173.

Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Rhetoric in democracy: A systemic appreciation. Political theory, 38(3), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0090591709359596

Fairclough, N. (1995). (1995b) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.

Obama, B. (2008). Obama’s Speech on Race. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Constitution Centre, March 18th.

Obama, B. (2009). A New Beginning. Washington DC, White House, June 4th.

Obama, B. (2009). Obama Announces New Afghanistan. Pakistan Strategies, March 27th.

Obama, B. (2009). Obama’s Inaugural Address. The Capitol Building, January 20th.

Obama, B. (2014). On United States Strategy to Combat the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant Terrorist Organization (ISIL). Washington DC, White House, September 10th.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. John Benjamins Publishing.

Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Introduction: Theory, interdisciplinarity and critical discourse analysis. In Critical discourse analysis (pp. 1-32). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Wodak, R. (2004). Critical Discourse Analysis. Qualitative Research Practice, Clive Seale, etal. (Eds). London: Sage Publications.

Published
2020-05-11
How to Cite
Raissouni, I. (2020). The language of American political discourse: Aristotle’s rhetorical appeals as manifested in Bush’s and Obama’s speeches on the war on terror. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 6(4), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v6n4.904