Monitoring of patients using radiodiagnostic dosage EI (Exposure Index) on CR (Computed Radiography)

Authors

  • I Ketut Putra Physics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Gusti Agung Ayu Ratnawati Physics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Gusti Ngurah Sutapa Physics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v6n6.1029

Keywords:

CR, dose monitoring, EI, modality, radiographer

Abstract

Most of the current radiographic examinations have used digital technology, one of which is for image readers and image processing using the CR (Computed Radiography) modality. The use of CR is more advantageous than film-screen systems because it has faster image acquisition and processing, a wide dynamic range, easy contrast adjustment, brightness, and electronic cropping. Unfortunately, the amount of exposure radiation is difficult to assess when using digital imaging compared to screen-film systems. Based on field observations, a radiographer tends to ignore the EI (Exposure Index) value in the application of the CR modality. The success of the radiographer in the radiography process is limited to the image that is not repeated. Even though the image quality factor is not merely a matter of repeated images or not, but also those who have the breadth of information and also must maintain protection principles for patients, in this case, is the acceptance of the dose due to radiography. So it is necessary to monitor the patient's dose using the EI value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AAPM. (2009). An Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography.

Adler, A., Carlton, R., & Wold, B. (1992). A comparison of student radiographic reject rates. Radiologic Technology, 64(1), 26-32.

Akhadi, M. (2000). Basics of Radiation Protection. Jakarta: Rineka Reserved.

Anaisa, I. (2012). Optimization of phantom images using CR head examination of the PA, Medical Physics Thesis, University of Indonesia, Jakarta.

Brealey, S., Scally, A., Hahn, S., Thomas, N., Godfrey, C., & Coomarasamy, A. (2005). Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis. Clinical radiology, 60(2), 232-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2004.07.012

Fahmi, A., Firdausi, K. S. & Wahyu, S. B. (2008). The Effect of Exposure Factors on Abdomen Examination on Radiograph Quality and Radiation Exposure Using Computed Radiography, Periodic Physics ISSN: 1410 - 9662 11(4), 109-118

Fitousi, N. (2017). Patient dose monitoring systems: a new way of managing patient dose and quality in the radiology department. Physica Medica, 44, 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.06.013

Gill, H. S., Elshahat, B., Kokil, A., Li, L., Mosurkal, R., Zygmanski, P., ... & Kumar, J. (2018). Flexible perovskite based X-ray detectors for dose monitoring in medical imaging applications. Physics in Medicine, 5, 20-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phmed.2018.04.001

Hardy, M., & Snaith, B. (2009). Radiographer interpretation of trauma radiographs: issues for radiography education providers. Radiography, 15(2), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2007.10.004

ICRP. (2007). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103, Annals of the ICRP, Elsevier Publications, Oxford, UK.

Jenkins, D. (1988). Radiographic, Photographic and Imaging Process.

Rochmayanti, D., Sugiyanto, & Wibowo, G. N. (2016). Adjustment of exposure index for optimization of radiographic quality on CR of Thoracic organs, Poltekkes Kemenkes Pedalangan; Banyumanik; Semarang

Sarayati, S. (2016). Analisis Faktor Perilaku Seksual Pada Anak Sd Di Sdn Dukuh Kupang Ii–489 Kecamatan Dukuh Pakis Kelurahan Dukuh Kupang Surabaya (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA).

Shepard, S. J., Pei-Jan, P. L. (2002). Quality Control In Diagnostic Radiologymembers. AAPM Report No. 74, Published For The American Association Of Physicists In Medicine By Medical Physics Publishing.

Sikumbang A.S. (2018). Analysis of Radiation Doses on Mobile X-rays of Emergency Patients in the ICU Room, University of North Sumatra, Medan.

Snaith, B., & Hardy, M. (2008). Radiographer abnormality detection schemes in the trauma environment—An assessment of current practice. Radiography, 14(4), 277-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2007.09.001

Suryatika, I. B. M., Sutapa, G. N., & Kasmawan, I. G. A. (2019). Radiology patient dosage monitoring for local diagnostic reference level. International research journal of engineering, IT & scientific research, 5(5), 26-31.

Susilo, Sunarno, Setiowati, Lestari. (2012). Application of Digital Radiography Tools in Photorontgen Service Development, Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, State University of Semarang, 35(2), 145-150.

Sutapa, G. N., Yuliara, I. M., & Ratini, N. N. (2018). Verification of dosage and radiation delivery time breast cancer (Mammae Ca) with ISIS TPS. International journal of health sciences, 2(2), 78-88.

Wilks, R. J. (1987). Principles of radiological physics. Churchill Livingstone.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-13

How to Cite

Putra, I. K. ., Ratnawati, G. A. A. ., & Sutapa, G. N. . (2020). Monitoring of patients using radiodiagnostic dosage EI (Exposure Index) on CR (Computed Radiography). International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 6(6), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v6n6.1029

Issue

Section

Research Articles