Comprehensive assessment and its relationship with high school students learning
Keywords:
comprehensive evaluation, learning, performance, skillsAbstract
The research aims to analyze comprehensive assessment and its relationship with student learning in a particular educational unit in the city of Portoviejo. The applied methodology has a mixed approach (qualitative and quantitative), an exploratory research was carried out to analyze the problem. The research techniques used were the survey of the teaching staff of the institution and the academic averages of the elementary school students. The results reflected that in the institution the comprehensive evaluation is partially applied, which is reflected in an acceptable academic performance. It was concluded that teachers apply evaluative instruments as they deem necessary, there is no homogeneity between hetero-evaluation, co-evaluation and self-evaluation.
Downloads
References
Ahumada, P. (2005). Authentic evaluation: a system for obtaining evidence. Educational Perspective, Teacher Training, 45, 11-24. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3333/333329100002.pdf
Baldeón, P., & Pabón, J. (2018). Module of hetero-evaluation and self-evaluation of the professor, based on the SIGE of the Technological University, through the Extreme Programming methodology. (Bachelor's thesis). University of Israel, Quito, Ecuador. Obtained from http://repositorio.uisrael.edu.ec/handle/47000/1671
Cárdenas, F., & Zapata, P. (2013). Active learning and authentic assessment. Science education: journal of research and didactic experiences(0), 649-654. Obtained from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6872807&orden=0&info=link
Chrobak, R. (2017). Meaningful learning to encourage critical thinking. Archives of Educational Sciences, 11(12). Retrieved February 20, 2021, from http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/library?a=d&c=arti&d=Jpr8292
De Fraiture, C., Molden, D., & Wichelns, D. (2010). Investing in water for food, ecosystems, and livelihoods: An overview of the comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Agricultural Water Management, 97(4), 495-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.08.015
Díaz, A., & Hernández, R. (2015). Constructivism and meaningful learning. Retrieved February 20, 2021, from http://metabase.uaem.mx/handle/123456789/647
Fernández, A., & Vanga, M. (2015). Process of self-evaluation, co-evaluation and hetero-evaluation to characterize student behavior and improve their performance. Revista San Gregorio, 6-15. Obtained from http://revista.sangregorio.edu.ec/index.php/REVISTASANGREGORIO/article/view/52
Fernández, S. (2017). Evaluation and learning. MarcoELE. Journal of Spanish Foreign Language Didactics(24). Retrieved February 19, 2021, from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/921/92153187003.pdf
Galbán, S., & Ortega, C. (2018). Didactic evaluation of educational software. Pan American Journal of Pedagogy(25). Retrieved February 20, 2021, from https://revistas.up.edu.mx/RPP/article/view/1691
García-Garro, A., Ramos-Ortega, G., León Ponce, A., & Olvera - Chávez, A. (2007). Evaluation instruments. Mexican Journal of Anesthesiology, 30(3), 158-164. Obtained from https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/rma/cma-2007/cma073f.pdf
González, M. (2000). Assessment of learning in university teaching. University pedogy magazine, 5(2), 1-26. Obtained from https://profesorailianartiles.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/evaluacic3b3n-del-aprendizaje-en-ensec3b1anza-universitaria-parte-1.pdf
Hamodi, C., Lopez, V., & Ana, L. (2015). Means, techniques and instruments of formative and shared evaluation of learning in higher education. Educational Profiles, 37(147), 146-161.
Jara, D., Aldas, H., Ávila, C., & Bravo, W. (2020). Self-evaluation and hetero-evaluation of the didactic process of the physical education class. Knowledge Pole: Scientific - Professional Journal, 5(11), 350-367. Obtained from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7659477.pdf
Jimenez, M. (1995). Social competence: preventive intervention at school. Childhood and Learning. Obtained from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Manuel_Jimenez3/publication/259442484_Competencia_social_intervencion_preventiva_en_la_escuela/links/54461db60cf2d62c304da000/Competencia-social-intervencion-preventiva-en-ladf (
Johnson, B. 2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0013189x033007014
Krausmann, F., Erb, K. H., Gingrich, S., Lauk, C., & Haberl, H. (2008). Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 471-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.012
Latorre, M. (2017). Meaningful and functional learning. Marcelino Champagnat University, 1-11.
López-Pastor, V., Sonvella, M., & Martínez, S. (2019). Formative and Shared Evaluation in Education. Ibero-American Journal of Educational Evaluation, 12(1), 5-9. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwixgoGugPnuAhUSSjABHZaIDB0QFjAGegQIAxAD&url=https%3Aartirio=https%3Aartirio=https%3Aartirio=https%3Aartirio=https%3Aartirio2. 2F6908767.pdf & usg = AOvVaw0vwkcLlvxyLFSq7RXNv4-6
Martínez, M., Yániz, C., & Villardón, L. (2018). Teacher self-evaluation and reflection to improve the professional competence of teachers in the knowledge society. NET. Journal of Distance Education, 56(10), 1-30. Obtained from https://www.um.es/ead/red/56/martinez_et_al.pdf
Mora, A. (2004). Educational evaluation: Concept, periods and models. Research News in Education, 4(2), 1-28. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/447/44740211.pdf
Morales, F. (2007). The effect of impulsivity on aggressiveness and its consequences on adolescent performance. (Doctoral Thesis). University of Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjT8rCLhfnuAhXgSTABHUTdDR4QFjAAegQIAhAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tdx.cat%2Fhandle%2F10803%2F8962&usg=AOvVaw2oCBiyzYxqdAGvMqOvPivy
Navarro , N., Falconí, A., & Espinoza, J. (2017). the improvement of the evaluation process for students in basic education. University and Society, 9(4), 58-69. Obtained from http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_isoref&pid=S2218-36202017000400008&lng=es&tlng=es
Pérez, R. (2015). The evaluation of educational programs: basic concepts, general approaches and problems. Journal of Educational Research, 18(2), 261-287. Retrieved February 20, 2021, from https://digitum.um.es/digitum/handle/10201/45401
Pope, D., Ramesh, H., Gennari, R., Corsini, G., Maffezzini, M., Hoekstra, H. J., ... & Audisio, R. A. (2006). Pre-operative assessment of cancer in the elderly (PACE): a comprehensive assessment of underlying characteristics of elderly cancer patients prior to elective surgery. Surgical oncology, 15(4), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2007.04.009
Rosales, C. (1990). Assess is to reflect on teaching. Narcea.
Ruiz, T., Rodríguez, N., Gallegos, L., & Villacis, J. (2018). Objective tests as instruments for measuring learning results. Atlante: Notebooks on Education and Development(96), 1-24.
Salazar, J. (2018). Assessment of meaningful learning and learning styles: Scope, proposal and challenges in the classroom. Pedagogical Trends(31), 1-16.
Sánchez, M. (2018). Assessing Student Learning: Is It Really That Complicated? University Digital Magazine, 19(6). Obtained from http://www.revista.unam.mx/2018v19n6/evaluacion-del-aprendizaje-de-los-estudiantes/
Talanquer, V. (2015). The importance of formative evaluation. Chemical Education, 26(3), 177-179. Retrieved February 19, 2021, from http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/eq/v26n3/0187-893X-eq-26-03-00177.pdf
Tamayo, R. (2018). Hetero-evaluation, self-evaluation, co-evaluation and shared evaluation: conceptual considerations. Atlante Notebooks on Education and Development. Retrieved from https://www.eumed.net/rev/atlante/2018/10/heteroevaluacion-autoevaluacion.html
Tejada, J. (2011). The evaluation of competences in non-formal contexts, evaluation devices and instruments. Education Magazine(354), 341-342. Obtained from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3418213&orden=0&info=link
Tejada, J. (2011). The evaluation of competences in non-formal contexts: evaluation devices and instruments. Education Magazine, 731-745. Obtained from http://www.revistaeducacion.educacion.es/re354/re354_29.pdf
Ülger, Z., Halil, M., Kalan, I., Yavuz, B. B., Cankurtaran, M., Güngör, E., & Ar?o?ul, S. (2010). Comprehensive assessment of malnutrition risk and related factors in a large group of community-dwelling older adults. Clinical Nutrition, 29(4), 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2010.01.006
Villarroel, J. (2012). Qualifications as an obstacle to the development of thought. Sophia, Collection of Philosophy of Education(12), 141-151. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4418/441846101009.pdf
Wei, J. T., Dunn, R. L., Litwin, M. S., Sandler, H. M., & Sanda, M. G. (2000). Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology, 56(6), 899-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00858-X
Yan, C. G., Cheung, B., Kelly, C., Colcombe, S., Craddock, R. C., Di Martino, A., ... & Milham, M. P. (2013). A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics. Neuroimage, 76, 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.004
Zambrano, L. (2016). Evaluation of the learning of the English language in students of the ninth year of basic education in the parallels "A and B" of the educational unit "Augusto Solórzano Hoyos" canton Chone, Manabí, period 2016. Central University of Ecuador, Chone, Ecuador. Obtained from http://www.dspace.uce.edu.ec/bitstream/25000/11661/1/T-UCE-0010-114.pdf
Zuñiga, C., & Cárdenas, P. (2014). Assessment instruments: What do students think when they finish compulsory schooling? Educational Perspective. Teacher Training, 53(1), 57-72. Obtained from file: /// C: /Users/ingca/Downloads/Dialnet-InstrumentosDeEvaluacionQuePiensanLosEstudiantesAl-4776618.pdf
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 International research journal of engineering, IT & scientific research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific research (IRJEIS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IRJEIS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IRJEIS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IRJEIS volumes 6 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
