Institutional learning and early economic impact results obtained by the network of business development centers in Chile



business assistance CDN, economic growth, micro and small businesses, public policies


Like other Latin American countries, Chile depends heavily on the activity of small and medium-sized companies to sustain some macro and microeconomic indicators. In particular, one of the productive development agencies that has taken a leading role in this objective is the Technical Cooperation Service (SERCOTEC). This institution has defined a set of support programs in different areas in order to meet the needs of this business segment. In this context, the article provides an overview of institutional learning, lessons learned, and economic impacts obtained by the Business Development Centers program, describing the central role of this innovative public policy that has responded actively and efficiently to the growth of the ventures and companies assisted between the years 2015-2019.


Download data is not yet available.


Atienza, M., & Aroca, P. (2012). Concentration and growth in Chile: an ignored negative relationship. EURE (Santiago) , 38 (114), 257-277.

Bansal, P., & Bogner, W. C. (2002). Deciding on ISO 14001: economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Planning, 35(3), 269-290.

Benavente, JM, & Külzer, C. (2008). Creation and destruction of companies in Chile. Economic Studies , 35 (2), 215-239.

Brülhart, M., & Sbergami, F. (2009). Agglomeration and growth: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(1), 48-63.

Budget Office (2019). Final evaluation report of the business development program in the territories (Business development centers).

Caplow, S., Jagger, P., Lawlor, K., & Sills, E. (2011). Evaluating land use and livelihood impacts of early forest carbon projects: Lessons for learning about REDD+. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(2), 152-167.

Ffrench-Davis, R. (2003). Chile, between neoliberalism and growth with equity. New Society, 183, 70-90.

Horton, D., & Mackay, R. (2003). Using evaluation to enhance institutional learning and change: recent experiences with agricultural research and development. Agricultural Systems, 78(2), 127-142.

International Labor Office and Technical Cooperation Service (2010). The situation of micro and small companies in Chile.

Kantis, H. and Díaz, S. (2008). Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Chile: An X-ray of Dynamic Entrepreneurs and Their Business Practices. Endeavor Chile.

Ministry of Economy, Development and Tourism (2019). ELE-5 Bulletin: Main Results. Commercial and Industrial Policy Division.

OECD (2011), OECD Regional Outlook 2011: Building Resilient Regions for Stronger Economies, OECD Publishing, Paris,

Orihuela, J. C. (2013). How do “mineral-states” learn? Path-dependence, networks, and policy change in the development of economic institutions. World Development, 43, 138-148.

Paavola, J., & Adger, W. N. (2005). Institutional ecological economics. Ecological economics, 53(3), 353-368.

Planas Serralta, L. (2016). Innovation systems and strategies in regions of Chile [Doctoral Thesis, University of Valladolid]. UVaDOC.

Suazo, G. and Pérez, J. (2014). Business Demography in Chile (Statistical Economic Studies No. 108 September 2014). Central Bank of Chile.

Valenzuela, P., Ramos, J. and Andrade, M. (2018). Impact Evaluation Business Development Centers in Chile: Generating employment through smaller companies [Public Systems Series No. 15]. Center for Public Systems.



How to Cite

Barra Novoa, R. (2021). Institutional learning and early economic impact results obtained by the network of business development centers in Chile. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 7(4), 136-147.



Research Articles