Structure analysis of building functions transition on the earthquake area five reviewed from costs and time schedule

https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v8n1.2039

Authors

  • I Wayan Suasira Department of Civil Engineering, Bali State Polytechnic, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Intara Department of Civil Engineering, Bali State Polytechnic, Indonesia
  • I Ketut Sutapa Department of Civil Engineering, Bali State Polytechnic, Indonesia
  • I Made Anom Santiana Department of Civil Engineering, Bali State Polytechnic, Indonesia
  • I Gede Sastra Wibawa Department of Civil Engineering, Bali State Polytechnic, Indonesia
  • I Made Tapa Yasa Department of Civil Engineering, Bali State Polytechnic, Indonesia

Keywords:

building functions, costs, earthquake, time schedule, transition

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the dimensions and reinforcement of structure, cost, and schedule due to the transition structure of the building function. The structural transition of building functions is carried out in the earthquake area five with the classification of soft and hard soils. The building used as a research model is a 3-story residence on Nuansa Utama Selatan Street number 3, Jimbaran, Bali. The planning of this building will be converted into office buildings and shophouse on the 2nd and 3rd floors functioning as a warehouse in the earthquake area five in Bali with the classification of soft and hard soil that will be analyzed using SAP 2000 program so that the structural dimensions are used as a reference in the creation of costs, and schedule obtained using Microsoft Project program. The analysis of structure shows that the structure of a residential house on hard soil has the dimensions and reinforcement of the smallest structure. The ratio of structural reinforcement in the transition of structure functions from residential house to office on hard soil by 1.32% with the lowest structure cost ratio by 1.80% and schedule of the structure by 3.80%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Babi?, A., & Dolšek, M. (2016). Seismic fragility functions of industrial precast building classes. Engineering structures, 118, 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.069

Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2002). Procedures for Planning Earthquake Resilience for Buildings, SNI 03-1726-2002, Jakarta: Badan Standarisasi Nasional,.

Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2013). Minimum Loads for Building Design and Other Structures, SNI 1727:2013, Jakarta: Badan Standarisasi Nasional,.

Boisgontier, M. P., & Cheval, B. (2016). The anova to mixed model transition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 1004-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.034

Doniyor, P., & Khabibulla, P. (2021). Theoretical research of mechanics of yarns in assembly winding machines. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 7(5), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v7n5.1928

Feng, C. W., Chen, Y. J., & Huang, J. R. (2010). Using the MD CAD model to develop the time–cost integrated schedule for construction projects. Automation in Construction, 19(3), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.12.009

Fiedrich, F., Gehbauer, F., & Rickers, U. (2000). Optimized resource allocation for emergency response after earthquake disasters. Safety science, 35(1-3), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00021-7

Ghobarah, A. (2001). Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development. Engineering structures, 23(8), 878-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00036-0

Gupta, M., & Khan, M. A. (2021). Advances in applications of non-destructive testing (NDT): a review. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 7(3), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v7n3.1003

Hamdi, F. (2016). Analisis dan Evaluasi Kekuatan Struktur Atas Gedung Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen IPB Terhadap Faktor Gempa Berdasarkan SNI 1727: 2013.

Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference?. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 27, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007

McGuire, R. K. (2001). Deterministic vs. probabilistic earthquake hazards and risks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21(5), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00019-7

Oral, G. K., Yener, A. K., & Bayazit, N. T. (2004). Building envelope design with the objective to ensure thermal, visual and acoustic comfort conditions. Building and Environment, 39(3), 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(03)00141-0

Todorovska, M. I., & Trifunac, M. D. (2008). Earthquake damage detection in the Imperial County Services Building III: analysis of wave travel times via impulse response functions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28(5), 387-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.07.001

Xue, X., Ai, X., Fang, J., Yao, W., & Wen, J. (2022). Real-time schedule of integrated heat and power system: A multi-dimensional stochastic approximate dynamic programming approach. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 134, 107427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107427

Published

2022-01-13

How to Cite

Suasira, I. W., Intara, I. W., Sutapa, I. K., Santiana, I. M. A., Wibawa, I. G. S., & Yasa, I. M. T. (2022). Structure analysis of building functions transition on the earthquake area five reviewed from costs and time schedule. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 8(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v8n1.2039

Issue

Section

Research Articles