Task-based learning and student team achievement division on students motivation and reading achievement

An experimental studies

https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v4n2.230

Authors

  • Lisa Dewi Purnama Sari Mataram University, Indonesia
  • - Arifuddin Mataram University, Indonesia
  • Kamaludin Yusra Mataram University, Indonesia

Keywords:

Motivation, Reading Achievement, Task-Based Learning, Student Team Achievement Division

Abstract

This study aimed at identifying the effect of Task-Based Learning (TBL) on students’ motivation and reading achievement, the effect of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on students’ motivation and reading achievement, and the difference in the effect of Task-Based Learning (TBL) and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on students’ motivation and reading achievement. The sample of this research was the grade X students of SMAN 2 Aikmel in academic year 2017/2018. This research used true experimental with pre-test and post-test only designs. Quantitative analysis was done by using two-way ANOVA for hypotheses testing. After analyzing the data, the result of the research showed that TBL was effective to improve the students’ reading achievement and was also effective to increase the students’ motivation. In the same way, when the test was applied to STAD class, the result indicated that STAD also had efficacy to enhance students’ reading achievement and to increase students’ motivation. Furthermore, from the result of the research, it was clear that TBL and STAD had no different results in improving students’ reading achievement and motivation. Thus, from the result of the analysis it could be concluded that there was significant effect of Task-Based Learning (TBL) on students’ motivation and reading achievement; there was significant effect of Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on students’ motivation and reading achievement; and there was no any significant difference in the effect of Task-Based Learning (TBL) and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on students’ motivation and reading achievement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bilsborough, K. (2013). TBL and PBL: Two learner-centred approaches. TBL and PBL: Two learner-centred approaches| TeachingEnglish| British Council| BBC.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Teaching by Principles. New York: Longman.
Chapman, C. (2007). Book Review: Creating a Learning School by David Middlewood, Richard Parker and Jackie Beere. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 2005, ISBN 1412910420 (pbk), ISBN 1412910412 (hbk),£ 19.99. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(4), 595-596.
David, N. (2004). Task-based language teaching.
Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (Ed.). (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language (Vol. 11). John Benjamins Publishing.
Gardner, R. (1985). C. 1985. Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation.
Ginaya, G., Rejeki, I. N. M., & Astuti, N. N. S. (2018). The effects of blended learning to students’ speaking ability. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture (IJLLC), 4(3), 1-14.
Harmer, J. (1998). How to Teach English: an Introduction to the Practice of English Language Teaching, England.
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. London/New York.
Littlewood, W., & William, L. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge university press.
Macías, E. I. P., Cedeño, H. A. C., & Chávez, G. M. R. (2018). Importance of Improving Resilience in Teaching-Learning Process of Students with Disabilities. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences (IRJMIS), 5(2), 120-128.
Macías, E. I. P., Cedeño, H. A. C., & Chávez, G. M. R. (2018). Importance of Improving Resilience in Teaching-Learning Process of Students with Disabilities. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences (IRJMIS), 5(2), 120-128.
MacLeod, M. (2007). Types of reading. URL: http://fis. ucalgary. ca/Brian/611/readingtype. html.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology (Vol. 192). New York: prentice hall.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge university press.
Slavin, R. E. (1985). An introduction to cooperative learning research. In Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 5-15). Springer, Boston, MA.
Stevens, J. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge.
Thorndike, R. (1976). Reading comprehension in fifteen countries. New horizons in reading, 500-507.
Willis, J. (1996). A flexible framework for task-based learning. Challenge and change in language teaching, 52-62.

Published

2018-03-30

How to Cite

Sari, L. D. P., Arifuddin, .-., & Yusra, K. (2018). Task-based learning and student team achievement division on students motivation and reading achievement: An experimental studies. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 4(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v4n2.230

Issue

Section

Research Articles