Analysis of contractor capacity level in following E-tender in Gianyar District

I Wayan Suasira; I Made Anom Santiana; I Gede Sastra Wibawa; I Made Tapa Yasa; Ni Putu Ary Yuliadewi

doi:10.21744/irjeis.v9n3.2300

Authors

I Wayan Suasira
suasira@gmail.com
Politeknik Negeri Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
I Made Anom Santiana Politeknik Negeri Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
I Gede Sastra Wibawa Politeknik Negeri Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
I Made Tapa Yasa Politeknik Negeri Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
Ni Putu Ary Yuliadewi Universitas Pendidikan Nasional, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

ability level, contractor, conventional auctions, E-tender, government procurement goods

Abstract

The implementation of government procurement of goods/services in the Gianyar Regency is carried out electronically by E-Tendering. In practice, the participation and bid value of bidders tends to decrease both during conventional auctions and electronic auctions. This study aims to determine the level of contractors' ability to participate in e-tenders, factors that affect participation or contracts not to participate in e-tenders, and what deficiencies exist in the implementation of e-tenders in Gianyar Regency. The sample used in this study were 73 contractor companies in this Regency in the analysis of the contractor's ability level, and 43 companies in the factor and deficiency analysis where this number used the sampling method using simple random sampling technique with purposive sampling and data collection using observation from GAPENSI Gianyar Regency and questionnaires. Data analysis was carried out by descriptive analysis. From the results of the analysis of contractors, the dominant qualification is K1. Therefore, the contractor's ability to participate in e-tenders is the most dominant in projects valued at Rp.0 - Rp. 1 Billion. And for the category e-tender highest in the B2 qualification with the contractor's ability level, they can participate in projects worth Rp.0 - Rp. 50 billion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chabert, G., & Jaulin, L. (2009). Contractor programming. Artificial Intelligence, 173(11), 1079-1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2009.03.002

Dalpé, R. (1994). Effects of government procurement on industrial innovation. Technology in society, 16(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791X(94)90021-3

Doloi, H., Iyer, K. C., & Sawhney, A. (2011). Structural equation model for assessing impacts of contractor's performance on project success. International journal of project management, 29(6), 687-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.05.007

Evenett, S. J., & Hoekman, B. M. (2005). Government procurement: market access, transparency, and multilateral trade rules. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(1), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.01.001

Ghozali, I. (2011). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM.

Hardiyansyah, H. (2018). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik: Konsep, Dimensi, Indikator dan Implementasinya. Gava Media.

Holt, G. D. (1998). Which contractor selection methodology?. International Journal of project management, 16(3), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00035-5

Love, P. E., Gunasekaran, A., & Li, H. (1998). Concurrent engineering: a strategy for procuring construction projects. International journal of project management, 16(6), 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00066-5

Lubis, A. S. (2014). Prinsip-prinsip pengadaan barang/jasa Apakah Harus Dipedomani. Malang: Lembaga Pengembangan Insan Indonesia.

McAfee, R. P., & McMillan, J. (1989). Government procurement and international trade. Journal of international economics, 26(3-4), 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(89)90005-6

Mohamed, K. A., Khoury, S. S., & Hafez, S. M. (2011). Contractor’s decision for bid profit reduction within opportunistic bidding behavior of claims recovery. International journal of project management, 29(1), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.12.003

Putri, Y. K. W., & Sujana, I. K. (2018). The influence of bid-ask spread and leverage on earnings management with good corporate governance as moderating variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 5(3), 8-21.

Respawan, M., Sudarsana, I. K., & Nadiasa, M. (2017). Analisis Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Partisipasi Dan Nilai Penawaran Peserta Lelang Elektronik (E-Procurement) Jasa Konstruksi Di Kabupaten Buleleng. Jurnal Spektran, 1(5), 1-10.

Sikka, P., & Lehman, G. (2015). The supply-side of corruption and limits to preventing corruption within government procurement and constructing ethical subjects. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 28, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.008

Suacana, I. W. G., & Suaib, E. (2016). Democracy model based on Bali local wisdom values for capacity building of regional governance. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 3(9), 27-36.

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.

Sumanjeet, S. (2009). Emergence of payment systems in the age of electronic commerce: The state of art. Global Journal of International Business Research, 2(2).

Varnäs, A., Balfors, B., & Faith-Ell, C. (2009). Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts: current practice, problems and opportunities in green procurement in the Swedish construction industry. Journal of cleaner production, 17(13), 1214-1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.001