Analysis of cantilever beam reinforcement methods and costs in the Wonderland Uluwatu Project

https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v11n4.2544

Authors

  • I Wayan Intara Politeknik Negeri Bali, Badung, Indonesia
  • I Made Jaya Politeknik Negeri Bali, Badung, Indonesia
  • Alda Tertia Marella Politeknik Negeri Bali, Badung, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Suasira Politeknik Negeri Bali, Badung, Indonesia
  • I Ketut Sutapa Politeknik Negeri Bali, Badung, Indonesia

Keywords:

cantilever beam, cost, reinforcement

Abstract

A strong and durable structure is the expectation for every building. However, in the implementation of concrete manufacturing projects, there are still many issues due to the quality of concrete not meeting the plan specifications, resulting in an inability to withstand the working load. For example, in the building construction project at Wonderland Uluwatu, the planned concrete quality for the cantilever beam was K300. However, when the hammer test was conducted at 28 days of curing, the expected quality was not achieved. So, a cantilever beam is necessary to repair and strengthen the concrete structure of the building to ensure its safety. This research compares the reinforcement methods for cantilever beams in terms of cost. Two cantilever beam reinforcement methods will be implemented: first, steel jacketing reinforcement using 8 mm and 10 mm thick steel plates; second, IWF steel reinforcement with dimensions of 500 mm x 200 mm x 10 mm x 16 mm. These reinforcement methods will be evaluated through deflection analysis and deviation analysis. The results of this study indicate that the cost of the steel jacketing reinforcement method with thicknesses of 8 mm and 10 mm amounts to Rp. 345,086,768.00. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustinus, S., & Lesmana, C. (2019). Perbandingan Analisis Perkuatan Struktur Pelat dengan Metode Elemen Hingga. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 15(1), 1-25.

Asyraf, M. R. M., Ishak, M. R., Sapuan, S. M., Yidris, N., & Ilyas, R. A. (2020). Woods and composites cantilever beam: A comprehensive review of experimental and numerical creep methodologies. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 9(3), 6759-6776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.013

Barad, K. H., Sharma, D. S., & Vyas, V. (2013). Crack detection in cantilever beam by frequency based method. procedia engineering, 51, 770-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.110

Fischer, G., & Li, V. C. (2007). Effect of fiber reinforcement on the response of structural members. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 74(1-2), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.027

Khoeri, H. (2020). Pemilihan metode perbaikan dan perkuatan struktur akibat gempa (studi kasus pada Bank Sulteng Palu). Konstruksia, 12(1), 93-104.

Mariantha, H. N. (2018). Manajemen biaya: Cost management (Vol. 1). Celebes Media Perkasa.

Pala’biran, O. A., Windah, R. S., & Pandaleke, R. (2019). Perhitungan Lendutan Balok Taper Kantilever Dengan Menggunakan Sap2000. J. Sipil Statik, 7(8), 1039-1048.

Suasira, I. W., Intara, I. W., Sutapa, I. K., Santiana, I. M. A., Wibawa, I. G. S., & Yasa, I. M. T. (2022). Structure analysis of building functions transition on the earthquake area five reviewed from costs and time schedule. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 8(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v8n1.2039

Published

2025-07-27

How to Cite

Intara, I. W., Jaya, I. M., Marella, A. T., Suasira, I. W., & Sutapa, I. K. (2025). Analysis of cantilever beam reinforcement methods and costs in the Wonderland Uluwatu Project. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 11(4), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v11n4.2544

Issue

Section

Research Articles