Development of WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) standards on risk-based urban drainage projects to improve implementation time performance

https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v12n4.2613

Authors

  • Muhammad Nurkhalid Hassan Sulistiono Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16424, Indonesia
  • Rully Andhika Karim Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16424, Indonesia

Keywords:

Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), risk-based WBS, risk management, schedule performance, urban drainage projects

Abstract

This study aims to develop a standard WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) for urban drainage projects and identify risk factors that affect project schedule performance. This study uses a quantitative descriptive approach involving a literature review, expert validation, a preliminary survey, a respondent survey, a risk analysis, and the Delphi method. Data collection was conducted through six stages: initial WBS expert validation, final WBS expert validation, initial risk expert validation, a preliminary survey, a respondent survey, and final risk expert validation. Respondents consisted of construction practitioners involved in urban drainage projects, while expert validation was conducted by experienced professionals in the fields of construction and project management. The results show that a standard WBS for urban drainage projects consists of six levels: project level, work group, work type, work package, work activity, and resources, including materials, equipment, and labor. Furthermore, of the 71 risk variables identified from the literature and previous studies, 61 risk variables were validated by experts as variables that impact project schedule performance. These validated risks were then integrated into the relevant WBS elements. This study is used as a guideline for project planning and control to improve schedule performance and support more effective project implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arantes, A., & Ferreira, L. M. D. F. (2020). Underlying causes and mitigation measures of delays in construction projects: An empirical study. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 25(2), 165–181.

Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas). (2023). Laporan Tahunan Infrastruktur.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Jakarta. (2023). Statistik Daerah Provinsi DKI Jakarta.

Biffi, A. (2010). Project based enterprise: pensare e agire per progetti.

De Bakker, K., Boonstra, A., & Wortmann, H. (2010). Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. International Journal of project management, 28(5), 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.07.002

Hillson, D., & Simon, P. (2020). Practical project risk management: The ATOM methodology. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Jeong, J., & Jeong, J. (2021). Novel approach of the integrated work & risk breakdown structure for identifying the hierarchy of fatal incident in construction industry. Journal of Building Engineering, 41, 102406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102406

Kementerian PUPR. (2022). Peraturan Menteri PUPR No. 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Perkiraan Biaya Pekerjaan Konstruksi Bidang Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. Jakarta: Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 9.

Kerzner, H. (2017). PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2.0: strumenti, metodologie e metriche per il successo dei progetti. Project Manager: 32, 4, 2017, 46-48.

Leony, A., Latief, Y., & Wardahni, N. I. (2024). The development of maintenance and care system for public railway facility infrastructure integrated with building information modeling (BIM) software based on work breakdown structure (WBS). International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 10(3), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v10n3.2436

Meredith, J. R., & Mantel Jr, S. J. (2011). Project management: A managerial approach: A managerial approach. Wiley Global Education.

PMI (Project Management Institute). (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) 7th Edition.

Siregar, T. (2020). Effect of implementation of belief system and interactive control system on economic performance with environment performance as moderator. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 2(2), 103-122.

SOVIANA, M. S. (2023). Evaluasi Penerapan Building Information Modeling (Bim) Pada Spillway Bendungan Pidekso Di Wonogiri-1950100057 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara Sukoharjo).

Suanda, S. H., Perez, S., & Feddersen, F. (2016). Evaluation of a source-function wavemaker for generating random directionally spread waves in the sea-swell band. Coastal Engineering, 114, 220-232.

Susiawan, Latief Y., Riantini, L.S. (2019). Development of Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) risk based standard for pengembangan WBS ning at seaport project. Tesis. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Tansar, H., Duan, H. F., & Mark, O. (2023). A multi-objective decision-making framework for implementing green-grey infrastructures to enhance urban drainage system resilience. Journal of Hydrology, 620, 129381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129381

Thomas, H. R. (1999). Construction Contract Claims. Stipes Publishing.

Tonder, J.C., & Bekker, M.C. (2002). Analysis Of A Methodology To Obtain A Work Breakdown Structure Built Up From Interdependent Key Project Deliverable Packages. African Rhythm Project Management Conference.

Wang, H., & Hubbard, B. (2017). A Survey Study on Industrial Construction Project Supply Chain: On Time Performance and Practices of Structural Steel and Pipe Spools. Procedia Engineering, 196, 653-659.

Warszawski, A. (1982). Industrialization and Robotics in Building: A Managerial Approach. Harper & Row.

Wesli. (2008). Drainase Perkotaan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Wideman, R. M. (1992). Project and Program Risk Management: A Guide to Managing Project Risks and Opportunities. Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.

Winn, M. T. (2007). The Benefits of Work Breakdown Structures. Contract Management, 47(5), 16.

Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2nd edition. CA: Sage Publications.

Yudiansyah, M. (2002). Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi. Penerbit Andi.

Zecheru, V., & Olaru, G. (2016). Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) in Project Management. Review of International Comparative Management Volume 17, Issue 1, 61-69.

Published

2026-07-03

How to Cite

Sulistiono, M. N. H., & Karim, R. A. (2026). Development of WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) standards on risk-based urban drainage projects to improve implementation time performance. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 12(4), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v12n4.2613

Issue

Section

Research Articles