Bruner’s cognitive stages and their effects on the understanding of fraction concept

Authors

  • NLM Dwijayanti Ganesha University of Education (UNDIKSHA), Singaraja, Bali-Indonesia
  • I Gusti Putu Suharta Ganesha University of Education (UNDIKSHA), Singaraja, Bali-Indonesia
  • - Sariyasa Ganesha University of Education (UNDIKSHA), Singaraja, Bali-Indonesia

Keywords:

enactive, fraction concept, iconic, self-efficacy, symbolic

Abstract

This study aimed at determining: (1) the difference in the effect of employing the Bruner’s cognitive stages on the students’ understanding of fractions concept, (2) which of the Bruner’s cognitive stages gave better effect on the students’ understanding of the fractions concept, and (3) the linkage of Bruner’s cognitive stages which gave the best effect on the students' understanding of fractions concept based on the students’ self-efficacy. This research was a mixed method of the explanatory sequential type that combined quantitative and qualitative research. At first, experimental research was conducted then a case study was conducted to complement quantitative data. The population of this study was students of grade VII of SMP Negeri 2 Semarapura consisted of nine classes and the samples were three classes chosen with random sampling technique. The data of students' understanding of fractions concept were collected through the test and students’ self-efficacy data were collected using questionnaires, observation, and interviews.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardika, L. D., & Tampubolon, B. Pengaruh Penerapan Teori Belajar Bruner terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(6).

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.

Hawas, U. W., Gamal-Eldeen, A. M., El-Desouky, S. K., Kim, Y. K., Huefner, A., & Saf, R. (2013). Induction of caspase-8 and death receptors by a new dammarane skeleton from the dried fruits of Forsythia koreana. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, 68(1-2), 29-38.

Liu, X., & Koirala, H. (2009). The effect of mathematics self-efficacy on mathematics achievement of high school students.

Montgomery, D. C., Jennings, C. L., & Kulahci, M. (2015). Introduction to time series analysis and forecasting. John Wiley & Sons.

Nisbet, S., & Warren, E. (2000). Primary school teachers’ beliefs relating to mathematics, teaching and assessing mathematics and factors that influence these beliefs. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 2(34-47).

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do–Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics, and Science (Volume I). Paris: OECD Publishing.

PISA, O. (2012). Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Haettu, 21, 2016.

Sagala, S. (2010). Konsep dan makna pembelajaran.

Sudiarta, G. P., & Putu, G. (2007). Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Pemecahan Masalah dengan Pendekatan Metakognitif untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Statistika Matematika I Tahun2006/2007. Jurnal Pendidikan UNDIKSA, (3).

Suherman, E. (2003). Common TextBook Contemporary Learning Math Strategy. Bandung: JICA FPMIPA UPI.

Sukayasa, K. W. (2012). Adaptation of Bali Traditional Architecture on St. Yoseph Church in Denpasar. Ambiance, 1(1).

Published

2017-07-31

How to Cite

Dwijayanti, N., Suharta, I. G. P., & Sariyasa, .-. (2017). Bruner’s cognitive stages and their effects on the understanding of fraction concept. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 3(4), 37–46. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjeis/article/view/549

Issue

Section

Research Articles