The effectiveness of teaching program of CIPP evaluation model

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bali

https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v5n3.619

Authors

  • I Ketut Darma Politeknik Negeri Bali, Bukit Jimbaran, Badung, Bali, Indonesia

Keywords:

CIPP model, evaluation, polytechnic, program, teaching

Abstract

This study aimed at finding out the level of effectiveness of the implementation of the teaching at the  Department of  Mechanical Engineering Politeknik Negeri Bali (PNB) viewed from  the interrelatedness of the components of context, input, process, and product, This study used the evaluative study model of CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) and was done in two stages. The data were collected using a questionnaire, interview guide, and related documents that have proved to be highly valid and reliable. The data were analyzed descriptive-qualitatively and descriptive-quantitatively. The result showed that the implementation of the teaching program at the Department of Mechanical Engineering PNB viewed from the interrelatedness of the components of CIPP falls into the fairly effective category. On the other hand, the constraints encountered in the teaching program implementation were faced in the components of context and product. The greatest constraints were found in the variables of process and product related to the evaluation of nonacademic learning achievement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan edisi 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Coombs, P. H. 1982. Apakah Perencanaan Pendidikan Itu (terj), Bhatara Karya Akasara, Jakarta.

Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1973-22100-000

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of Educational. Englewood Cliffs.

Forouzandeh, E., Riazi, A. M., & Sadighi, F. (2008). TEFL program evaluation at master's level in Iran. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=135337

Galvin, J. C. (1983). What can trainers learn from educators about evaluating management training?. Training and development journal. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201302531946

Glickman, C. D. (2002). Leadership for learning: How to help teachers succeed. ASCD.

Gregory, R. J. (2004). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications. Allyn & Bacon. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-88183-000

Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching 6th Ed. USA: Mc.

Gunung, I. N., & Darma, I. K. (2018, May). Development of Evaluation Instrument Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Learning Program in Politeknik Negeri Bali Environment. In Proceedings (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 128-133). http://ojs.pnb.ac.id/index.php/Proceedings/article/view/855

Hasan, A., Yasin, S. N. T. M., & Yunus, M. F. M. (2015). A Conceptual Framework for Mechatronics Curriculum Using Stufflebeam CIPP Evaluation Model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 844-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.324

Hasan, A., Yasin, S. N. T. M., & Yunus, M. F. M. (2015). A Conceptual Framework for Mechatronics Curriculum Using Stufflebeam CIPP Evaluation Model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 844-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.324

Kemdikbud. (2014). Permendikbud No 104 Tahun 2014 mengenai Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Kemdikbud

Kemristekdikti. (2018a). Pengembangan Iptek dan Pendidikan Tinggi di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Retrieved from https://www.ristekdikti.go.id/pengembangan-iptek-dan-pendidikan-tinggi-di-era-revolusi-industri-4-0/. December 20, 2018

Komariah, A., & Triatna, C. (2005). Visionary leadership menuju sekolah efektif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Majid, A. (2009). Perencanaan Pembelajaran (PT Remaja Rosdakarya).

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Mulyono, M. A. (2008). Manajemen Administrasi dan Organisasi Pendidikan. Ar-Ruzz Media, Yogyakarta.

Nasution, M. N. (2001). Manajemen Mutu Terpadu (TQM). Chalia tndonesia, lakarta.

Pendidikan, P. M., & No, K. (49). Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. Peraturan Presiden Nomor, 8.

Popham, W. J. (1999). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Allyn & Bacon, A Viacom Company, 160 Gould St., Needham Heights, MA 02194; World Wide Web: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED423249

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Expressing and assessing program theory. Evaluation: A systematic approach, 7, 133-168.

Sahertian, P. A. (2000). Konsep dasar & teknik supervisi pendidikan: dalam rangka pengembangan sumber daya manusia. Penerbit Rineka Cipta.

Sani, R. A. (2016). Penilaian Autentik. http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/23839/

Sardiman, A. S., Raharjo, R., & Hariyono, A. (2010). Media Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Shang, L., Dong, S., & Nienhaus, G. U. (2011). Ultra-small fluorescent metal nanoclusters: synthesis and biological applications. Nano today, 6(4), 401-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2011.06.004

Slamet, N. H., Purnama, E., Kosela, S., & Gunlazuardi, J. (2005). Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 on copper-doped titania catalysts prepared by improved-impregnation method. Catal Commun, 6(5), 313-319.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31-62). Springer, Dordrecht. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (Vol. 50). John Wiley & Sons.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. Evaluation theory, models, and applications. 2007.

Suartika, I. N., Dantes, N., Candiasa, I. M., & Kom, M. I. (2013). Studi Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Praktek Kerja Industri (Prakerin) Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pendidikan Sistem Ganda Di SMK Negeri 1 Susut. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi pendidikan Indonesia, 3. http://119.252.161.254/e-journal/index.php/jurnal_ep/article/view/865

Sudjana, N. (2002). Dasar-dasar proses mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sugiyono, S. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan r&b. bandung. Indonesia: Alfabeta.

Suharsimi, A. Suhardjono, dan Supardi. 2012. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Sukardi, T. (2014). Tanam paksa di Banyumas: kajian mengenai sistem, pelaksanaan, dan dampak sosial ekonomi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Syah, M. (2000). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Suatu Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Waluyati, I. (2012). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial SMP/MTs di Kota Bima. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(1), 260-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i1.1117

Warju, W. (2016). Educational program evaluation using CIPP model. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 12(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v12i1.4502

Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran (Vol. 91). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-84. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262918987

Published

2019-04-09

How to Cite

Darma, I. K. (2019). The effectiveness of teaching program of CIPP evaluation model: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bali. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v5n3.619

Issue

Section

Research Articles