Implementation of the performance accountability system for government agencies (SAKIP) in realizing good governance at the Kediri city health office
Keywords:
good governance, health office, kediri city, SAKIPAbstract
In the implementation of SAKIP at the Kediri City Health Office, there were obstacles in making reports and implementing policies. This study used a qualitative descriptive method with a purposive sampling method. The result is a determinant of decision or policy-making by looking at the existing problems to produce an accurate strategy to improve performance. The priority scale of the program that is carried out then becomes very important in the sustainability of SAKIP in the coming year. This study is based on the results or performance orientation shown in the Government Agency Performance Report (LKjIP) and the implementation of SAKIP itself. The purpose of this research is to identify problems and solutions to problems faced in governance. Agency Performance Accountability System.
Downloads
References
Bastian, I. (2019). Lingkup Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Lingkup Akuntansi Sektor Publik.
Caraka, R. E., & Yasin, H. (2017). Spatial Data Panel. Wade Group.
Figlio, D. N., & Winicki, J. (2005). Food for thought: the effects of school accountability plans on school nutrition. Journal of public Economics, 89(2-3), 381-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.007
Figlio, D., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 3, 383-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53429-3.00008-9
Herwiyanti, E., Sukirman, S., & Aziz, F. S. (2017). Analisis Implementasi Akuntansi Berbasis Akrual pada Bracci, E. (2009). Autonomy, responsibility and accountability in the Italian school system. Critical perspectives on accounting, 20(3), 293-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.001
Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 19(1), 13–23.
Hutahayan, J. F. (2019). Faktor Pengaruh Kebijakan Keterbukaan Informasi Dan Kinerja Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta.
Jupir, M. M. (2013). Implementasi kebijakan pariwisata berbasis kearifan lokal (studi di Kabupaten Manggarai Barat). Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Development Studies, 1(1), 28–38.
Kamaroellah, R. A. (2017). Analisis Tingkat Kemampuan Keuangan Daerah dalam Mendukung Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah. NUANSA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial Dan Keagamaan Islam, 14(1), 123–138.
Lawrence, M. (2010). Young adults’ experience of stroke: A qualitative review of the literature. British Journal of Nursing, 19(4), 241–248.
Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches.
McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012). Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’governance? Geoforum, 43(1), 81–94.
Nofianti, L., & Suseno, N. S. (2014). Factors affecting implementation of good government governance (GGG) and their implications towards performance accountability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 98-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.056
Philpott, S. (2018). This stillness, this lack of incident: Making conflict visible in West Papua. Critical Asian Studies, 50(2), 259–277.
Platonova, E. (2013). Corporate social responsibility from an Islamic moral economy perspective: A literature survey. Afro Eurasian Studies, 2(1–2), 272–297.
Raskind, I. G., Shelton, R. C., Comeau, D. L., Cooper, H. L., Griffith, D. M., & Kegler, M. C. (2019). A review of qualitative data analysis practices in health education and health behavior research. Health Education & Behavior, 46(1), 32–39.
Reback, R. (2008). Teaching to the rating: School accountability and the distribution of student achievement. Journal of public economics, 92(5-6), 1394-1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.05.003
Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1998). Accountability.
Santoso, U., & Pambelum, Y. J. (2008). Pengaruh penerapan akuntansi sektor publik terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah dalam mencegah fraud. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 4(1).
Swinburn, B., Kraak, V., Rutter, H., Vandevijvere, S., Lobstein, T., Sacks, G., ... & Magnusson, R. (2015). Strengthening of accountability systems to create healthy food environments and reduce global obesity. The Lancet, 385(9986), 2534-2545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61747-5
Silverman, D. (2020). Qualitative research. Sage Publications Limited.
Widodo, J. (2021). Analisis kebijakan publik: Konsep dan aplikasi analisis proses kebijakan publik. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 International journal of business, economics & management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Business, Economics & Management (IJBEM) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJBEM right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJBEM can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.