Strategy for integrating rice and peanut cultivation in a polyculture system to increase agricultural land productivity

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v9n1.2461

Authors

  • Cening Kardi Faculty of Agriculture and Business, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Ni Putu Sukanteri Faculty of Agriculture and Business, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Ni Putu Anglila Amaral Faculty of Agriculture and Business, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Sheila Marie F. Gatchalian BASC-Filipina
  • Meriam F. Sulit BASC-Filipina
  • Nerilyn J. Victoria BASC-Filipina
  • I Kadek Deva Mahayana Faculty of Agriculture and Business, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Yoga Wibawa Darma Faculty of Agriculture and Business, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Eduardus Bani Faculty of Agriculture and Business, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

strategy, rice and peanut cultivation, polyculture system, agricultural land productivity

Abstract

Efforts to increase agricultural productivity to meet national food needs are complex challenges that require an integrated strategic approach. One step that can be taken is to improve the efficiency of the rice agribusiness through the application of balanced fertilization recommendations and appropriate pricing policies. Therefore, the development of the peanut-based food industry has led to an increase in domestic demand for peanuts.  The increasing demand for peanuts is a great market opportunity for the development of peanut production. Increased income and public knowledge about nutrition have changed people's food consumption patterns from energy-producing carbohydrate foods to protein-producing foods, both animal and vegetable. The integration of the two through a polyculture system provides opportunities for synergy: peanut roots provide biological nitrogen for rice, help suppress weeds, and increase the efficiency of space and resource utilization. Intercropping rice and peanuts significantly increases land productivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afiyanti, Y. (2008). Focus group discussion (diskusi kelompok terfokus) sebagai metode pengumpulan data penelitian kualitatif. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, 12(1), 58-62.

Akhsan, A., Ahmad, M., & Setyawan, C. E. (2022). Hal terpenting adalah memahami arti kata "Arab" dan makna kata "Arab". Ihtimam: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 5(2), 136-154.

Assopi, A. S., Sudharmawan, A. K., Fauzi, M. T., & Wangiyana, W. (2025). Peningkatan Produktivitas dan Nilai Ekonomi Pertanian: Tinjauan Keuntungan Penerapan Tumpangsari Tanaman Serealia dengan Kacang-kacangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Agrokomplek, 4(2), 431-437.

Asuncion, M. J. L. (2019). Yield response of upland rice + peanut intercropping schemes to Rhizobial (Bio-N) inoculation. International Journal of Biosciences, 14(1), 484–494.

Aulia, A. N., Nalawati, A. N., Aulia, S., Sinada, F. R., & Nafisa, F. Z. (2025). Strategi Implementasi Diversifikasi Produk Pangan Lokal Sebagai Upaya Eksplorasi Alternatif Pangan di Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Bisnis Tani, 11(1).

Chu, G. X., Shen, Q. R., & Cao, J. L. (2004). Nitrogen fixation and N transfer from peanut to rice cultivated in aerobic soil in an intercropping system and its effect on soil N fertility. Plant and soil, 263(1), 17-27.

Erythrina, E., Susilawati, S., Slameto, S., Resiani, N. M. D., Arianti, F. D., Jumakir, J., ... & Sembiring, H. (2022). Yield advantage and economic performance of rice–maize, rice–soybean, and maize–soybean intercropping in rainfed areas of Western Indonesia with a wet climate. Agronomy, 12(10), 2326.

Evizal, R., & Prasmatiwi, F. E. (2021). Pilar dan model pertanaman berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Jurnal Galung Tropika, 10(1), 126-137.

Jena, J. K., Ayyappan, S., & Aravindakshan, P. K. (2002). Comparative evaluation of production performance in varied cropping patterns of carp polyculture systems. Aquaculture, 207(1-2), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00800-6

Nurullaev, A. S. (2021). The model of insurance protection of business in the agricultural sector in the context of institutional transformations. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 4(2), 344-349. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijbem.v4n2.1658

Olesen, J. E., & Bindi, M. (2002). Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. European journal of agronomy, 16(4), 239-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00004-7

Rangkuti F. (2017). Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis Analisis SWOT. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Rosenzweig, E. D., Roth, A. V., & Dean Jr, J. W. (2003). The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: an exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers. Journal of operations management, 21(4), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(03)00037-8

Wangiyana, W., Aryana, I. G. P. M., & Zainab, S. (2024). Increasing yield of colored rice through rice-peanut intercropping under aerobic irrigation systems. Research Advances and Challenges in Agricultural Sciences Vol. 1, 1-19.

Wangiyana, W., Farida, N., & Abdurrachman, H. (2020). Relay-planting of peanuts between double or triple rows at different dates increases growth, nitrogen content, and yield of red rice under aerobic irrigation systems. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 5(5).

Willey, R. (1979). Intercropping-its importance and research needs. 1. Competition and yield advantages.

Zainab, S., & Wangiyana, W. (2021). Pertumbuhan dan hasil dua varietas kacang tanah dalam tumpangsari replacement series dengan padi beras hitam sistem irigasi aerobik pada bedeng. Jurnal Silva Samalas, 4(1), 1-9.

Published

2026-01-04

How to Cite

Kardi, C., Sukanteri, N. P., Amaral, N. P. A., Gatchalian, S. M. F., Sulit, M. F., Victoria, N. J., Mahayana, I. K. D., Darma, I. W. Y. W., & Bani, E. (2026). Strategy for integrating rice and peanut cultivation in a polyculture system to increase agricultural land productivity. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 9(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v9n1.2461

Most read articles by the same author(s)