Feedback and improvement on teaching-learning process for basic general education students

https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v3n1.123

Authors

  • Karina Elizabeth Luque Alcívar Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Sede Manabí, Campus Chone, Chone, Ecuador
  • Eugenia Narcisa Arroyo Carrera Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Sede Manabí, Campus Chone, Chone, Ecuador
  • Monica Elizabeth Solórzano Zambrano Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Sede Manabí, Campus Chone, Chone, Ecuador
  • Manuel Aurelio Zambrano Bravo Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Sede Manabí, Campus Chone, Chone, Ecuador

Keywords:

academic performance, pedagogical feedback, student, teaching performance mode, teaching processes – learning

Abstract

The process of pedagogical feedback is a factor that affects student training since it allows identifying their strengths and weaknesses with the sole objective of improving them and thus strengthening their academic performance. The general objective of the research is to determine the actions that teachers carry out to provide feedback and optimize the teaching-learning processes of the students of the Tenth year of Basic General Education, of the General Educational Unit "Eloy Alfaro" of Canton Chone. The research is exploratory since the study is based on the collection, analysis and interpretation of data in order to obtain a synthesis of the phenomenon related to the feedback process. The quantitative and descriptive method was applied to explore, observe, analyze, detail and verify the data obtained. The results achieved detail the level of knowledge that teachers have about the referred process and the strategies implemented, being able to verify whether they promote cognitive learning of the student; being the only way to create active, innovative, motivating and capable students to make their own decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Chacín, M. N. (2003). La evaluación virtual en la práctica. On line).(Junio).(Consulta, marzo 15 de 2008). Disponible en internet: www. ucv. ve/edutec/Ponencias/69. doc.

Delgado, J. L. D., Bone, Y. I. E. B., Lascano, M. A. G. L., & España, S. G. G. E. (2019). Dyslexia as learning problem and its pedagogical intervention. International Journal of Health Sciences, 3(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijhs.v3n3.333

Education, M. (2019). Instructions for the application of student evaluation. Quito: MINIEDUC.

Flores, G., & Ramírez, M. (2009). Interrelation of the evaluation of learning with feedback as a strategy for educational improvement. University of Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico: XVIII International Meeting on Distance Education.

Flores, G., & Ramírez, M. (2009). Interrelation of the evaluation of learning with feedback as a strategy for educational improvement. Memories of the XVIII International Meeting on Distance Education.

Gonzáles, J. (2018). Benefits and Limitations of Performance Feedback by the directors and coordinators of an academy dedicated to Teaching a Foreign Language to their Work Teams. (Undergraduate thesis). Guatemala of the Assumption: Rafael Landivar University.

Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. (2009). Generative learning strategies and metacognitive feedback to facilitate comprehension of complex science topics and self-regulation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 18(1), 5-25.

Lozano, F., & Tamez, L. (2014). Formative feedback for distance education students. RIED Iberoamerican Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 197-221.

Lucas, M., Moya, M., & Rodriguez, M. (2019). Factors that influence school delay and its consequences on academic performance. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(8)-Special Issue.

Macías, E. I. P., Cedeño, H. A. C., & Chávez, G. M. R. (2018). Importance of Improving Resilience in Teaching-Learning Process of Students with Disabilities. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 5(2), 120-128.

Martínez, F., & Vargas, L. (2014). Formative feedback for distance education students. LAUGH Iberoamerican Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 197-221.

Meneses, B. (2007). Interaction and learning in the university (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Rovira i Virgili).

Mero, E., Pazmino, M., & Rodriguez M. (2019). An Innovative Proposal For Teaching Learning: The Inverted Classroom. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(8)-Special Issue.

Osorio, K., & ALpez, A. (2014). Formative feedback in the teaching-learning process of preschoolers. Iberoamericana Magazine, 13-40.

Quesada, C. (2006). Evaluation of Learning in Distance Education "Online". Distance Education Magazine, 3-15.

Sierra, J. (2005). Research Advancement: Regulation of resources in the Social Communication program in the Studies System of the Catholic University Foundation of the Note. Virtual Magazine Universidad Católica del Norte, 1(16).

Torres, Z. (2019). Effect of Variations in pedagogical feedback on learning English. Cuaderno deLengüistica Hispánica, 34(34).

Vives, T., & Varela, M. (2012). Effective Feedback Research in Medical Education. ELSEVIER, 2(6), 112-114.

Published

2020-02-08

How to Cite

Alcívar, K. E. L., Carrera, E. N. A., Zambrano, M. E. S., & Bravo, M. A. Z. (2020). Feedback and improvement on teaching-learning process for basic general education students. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v3n1.123