Bilateral and institutional partnership between Georgia and the United States: a retrospective analysis

https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v4n2.1721

Authors

Keywords:

Caspian and South Caucasus region, conflict of interest, foreign policy, Georgia, Russia, USA

Abstract

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the South Caucasus region became an extremely unstable geopolitical space, a battleground for the interests of several global players in global politics - the United States, Russia, the European Union, and other local players such as Iran and Turkey. The current difficult situation in the South Caucasus is the result of inter-ethnic conflicts, territorial and other disputes, as well as conflicts of interest of third parties in the region. The importance of Georgia in the region is determined primarily by its geographical location, which makes the country a central hub for transport communications. In this context, achieving stability in the South Caucasus is an important task for all participants in the international political process, realizing their interests in this region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balli, F., Balli, H. O., & Louis, R. J. (2016). The impacts of immigrants and institutions on bilateral tourism flows. Tourism Management, 52, 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.06.021

Baran, Z. (2005). The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: Implications for Turkey. The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: Oil Window to the West, 103-118.

Dalal, R. S., & Chahal, E. (2016). Ministers and civil servants relations in India: an evaluation. International research journal of engineering, IT & scientific research, 2(3), 9-15.

Deori, B. (2015). Identity Formation and Political Assertion Among the Deoris. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 2(3), 5-10.

Ginsburg, T. (2005). International substitutes for domestic institutions: Bilateral investment treaties and governance. International Review of Law and Economics, 25(1), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2004.06.002

Grundy, Q., Habibi, R., Shnier, A., Mayes, C., & Lipworth, W. (2018). Decoding disclosure: Comparing conflict of interest policy among the United States, France, and Australia. Health Policy, 122(5), 509-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.015

Litvak, K. (1996). The role of political competition and bargaining in Russian foreign policy: The case of Russian policy toward Moldova. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 29(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-067X(96)80006-7

Margaryan, A., Derenko, M., Hovhannisyan, H., Malyarchuk, B., Heller, R., Khachatryan, Z., ... & Allentoft, M. E. (2017). Eight millennia of matrilineal genetic continuity in the south Caucasus. Current Biology, 27(13), 2023-2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.087

Mercille, J. (2008). The radical geopolitics of US foreign policy: Geopolitical and geoeconomic logics of power. Political Geography, 27(5), 570-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.06.002

Mitchell, L. A. (2006). Democracy in Georgia since the rose revolution. Orbis, 50(4), 669-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2006.07.007

Ollivier, V., Fontugne, M., Lyonnet, B., & Chataigner, C. (2016). Base level changes, river avulsions and Holocene human settlement dynamics in the Caspian Sea area (middle Kura valley, South Caucasus). Quaternary International, 395, 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.03.017

Pleurdeau, D., Moncel, M. H., Pinhasi, R., Yeshurun, R., Higham, T., Agapishvili, T., ... & Tushabramishvili, N. (2016). Bondi cave and the middle-upper Palaeolithic transition in western Georgia (South Caucasus). Quaternary Science Reviews, 146, 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.06.003

Tuathail, G. Ó., & Agnew, J. (1992). Geopolitics and discourse: practical geopolitical reasoning in American foreign policy. Political geography, 11(2), 190-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-6298(92)90048-X

Zurabashvili, T. (2016). Let Georgia Join NATO. Foreign Affairs.

Published

2021-08-08

How to Cite

Atoev, T. A. (2021). Bilateral and institutional partnership between Georgia and the United States: a retrospective analysis. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 245-248. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v4n2.1721

Issue

Section

Articles