Understanding the best practices of public administration in the era of revolution 4.0: Scientific evidence from publications

Dwiatmodjo Budi Setyarto; Yohannes Suraja; Bening Hadilinatih; Ayurisya Dominata; Siti Kholiyah

doi:10.21744/ijss.v5n4.2008

Authors

Dwiatmodjo Budi Setyarto
dwiatmodjo.budi@gmail.com
ASM Marsudirini Santa Maria Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Yohannes Suraja ASM Marsudirini Santa Maria Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Bening Hadilinatih Universitas Proklamasi 45 Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Ayurisya Dominata Directorate of Politics, Law, Defense and Security National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia
Siti Kholiyah Bureau for State Owned Properties Management and Procurement National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

Keywords:

best practice, public administration, revolution era, scientific, understanding

Abstract

We carry out this study intending to gain an in-depth understanding of the best practices of public administration in the era of the technological revolution, which is the result of scientific research publications in a multi-field context. In order to answer and enliven this discussion, we have conducted a series of data searches on several books and other academic papers that focus on telling the best practices of public administration in the revolutionary era. After getting the data, a high-in-depth evaluation data coding system is studied to get relevant results to answer the problem with high validity. After reviewing and discussing it, the best practice of public administration includes several things, including having a servant leadership spirit that is innovative and able to communicate. Conducive thinking saves many people and commits to continuously achieving government and private organizations' goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, Z., Shields, F., White, R., & Wilbert, J. (2010). Managerial communication: The link between frontline leadership and organizational performance. In First Annual General Business Conference Conference Proceedings (p. 69).

Alexander, M., Culos, K., Roddy, J., Shaw, J. R., Bachmeier, C., Shigle, T. L., & Mahmoudjafari, Z. (2021). Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: a comprehensive review of clinical efficacy, toxicity, and best practices for outpatient administration. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, 27(7), 558-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2021.01.014

Alshurman, M. (2015). Democratic education and administration. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 861-869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.551

Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949-960.

Asen, R. (2010). Reflections on the role of rhetoric in public policy. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 13(1), 121-143.

Bason, C. (2018). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Policy press.

Bauman, Z. (2010). Towards a Critical Sociology (Routledge Revivals): An Essay on Commonsense and Imagination. Routledge.

Berman, E. M., Bowman, J. S., West, J. P., & Van Wart, M. R. (2021). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems. CQ Press.

Bibi, R. (2019). Challenging discourses on BSA Muslim women through an intersectional analysis of everyday experiences across spaces of home, work and public space. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom).

Brener, N. D., Billy, J. O., & Grady, W. R. (2003). Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. Journal of adolescent health, 33(6), 436-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00052-1

Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press.

Christensen, T., Fimreite, A. L., & Lægreid, P. (2014). Joined-up government for welfare administration reform in Norway. Public Organization Review, 14(4), 439-456.

Connelly, R., Playford, C. J., Gayle, V., & Dibben, C. (2016). The role of administrative data in the big data revolution in social science research. Social science research, 59, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.015

Cornelissen, J. P. (2020). Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice. Corporate Communication, 1-336.

Fathurrochman, I., Danim, S., Anwar, A. S., & Kurniah, N. (2021, March). The School Principals’ Role in Education Management at the Regional Level: An Analysis of Educational Policy in the Industrial Revolution 4.0. In International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2020) (pp. 237-242). Atlantis Press.

Fernandez, S., & Rainey, H. G. (2017). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. In Debating public administration (pp. 7-26). Routledge.

Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W., & Licari, M. J. (2018). The public administration theory primer. Routledge.

Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC medical research methodology, 13(1), 1-8.

Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2021). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance. Implementing Public Policy, 1-100.

Igho, O. L. (2022). Building on firm competitive advantage through core competence manufacturing firm. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 9(6), 800-812. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v9n6.2212

Janah, M., & Rahayu, A. Y. S. (2019, October). 3rd World Development Model in Indonesia: How to deal with the issues of decreasing public finance and overcoming the demands for public participation in Industrial Revolution 4.0 era?. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 328, No. 1, p. 012069). IOP Publishing.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2009). The increasing importance of public marketing: Explanations, applications and limits of marketing within public administration. European Management Journal, 27(3), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.10.003

Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications policy, 44(6), 101976.

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.

Löbenberg, R., & Amidon, G. L. (2000). Modern bioavailability, bioequivalence and biopharmaceutics classification system. New scientific approaches to international regulatory standards. European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics, 50(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(00)00091-6

Lozano, M., & Vallés, J. (2007). An analysis of the implementation of an environmental management system in a local public administration. Journal of environmental management, 82(4), 495-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.01.013

Meijer, A. J. (2011). Networked coproduction of public services in virtual communities: From a government?centric to a community approach to public service support. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 598-607.

Nabatchi, T. (2018). Public values frames in administration and governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 59-72.

Njonde, J. N., & Kimanzi, K. (2014). Effect of integrated financial management information system on performance of public sector: A case of Nairobi County Government. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship, 1(12), 913-936.

Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research.

Owens, E., & Ba, B. (2021). The economics of policing and public safety. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(4), 3-28.

Parker, M., Acland, A., Armstrong, H. J., Bellingham, J. R., Bland, J., Bodmer, H. C., ... & Sutherland, W. J. (2014). Identifying the science and technology dimensions of emerging public policy issues through horizon scanning. PLoS One, 9(5), e96480.

Parkinson, J. (2012). Democracy and public space: The physical sites of democratic performance. Oxford University Press.

Postiglione, G. A. (2011). Global recession and higher education in eastern Asia: China, Mongolia and Vietnam. Higher education, 62(6), 789-814.

Raadschelders, J. C. (2019). The state of theory in the study of public administration in the United States: Balancing evidence-based, usable knowledge, and conceptual understanding. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 41(1), 79-98.

Rajkomar, A., & Blandford, A. (2012). Understanding infusion administration in the ICU through distributed cognition. Journal of biomedical informatics, 45(3), 580-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2012.02.003

Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students.

Rodrigues, A. P. (2010). Market orientation, job satisfaction, commitment and organisational performance: the specific case of local public sector. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy.

Rosa, A. T. R. (2019). THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT APPARATUS (DEVOTION) ON DEVELOPMENT OF BUREAUCRACY IN PUBLIC POLICY PERSPECTIVES IN THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4.0 ERA (R & D Study In Rancasari Riung Bandung District, Bandung City, West Java). Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Bhakti Praja, 9(1), 17-30.

Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360-371.

Siddiquee, N. A. (2006). Public management reform in Malaysia: Recent initiatives and experiences. International Journal of Public Sector Management.

Smiciklas, M. (2012). The power of infographics: Using pictures to communicate and connect with your audiences. Que Publishing.

Spanou, C., & Sotiropoulos, D. A. (2011). The odyssey of administrative reforms in Greece, 1981–2009: A tale of two reform paths. Public Administration, 89(3), 723-737.

Steen, T., & Schott, C. (2019). Public sector employees in a challenging work environment. Public Administration, 97(1), 3-10.

Thijs, N., Hammerschmid, G., & Palaric, E. (2017). A comparative overview of public administration characteristics and performance in EU28. European Commission, Brussels.

Trong, N. P. N., Phi, N. T. N., Nguyen, L. T., Lan, N. M. ., & Thuy, P. N. T. . (2021). An assessment on impacts of online education on training quality and satisfaction of tourism undergraduate students in a private university and managerial implications for educators. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 8(6), 534-547. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v8n6.1932

Tuesta, L. M., Fowler, C. D., & Kenny, P. J. (2011). Recent advances in understanding nicotinic receptor signaling mechanisms that regulate drug self-administration behavior. Biochemical pharmacology, 82(8), 984-995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.026

Weber, K. M., Harper, J. C., Könnölä, T., & Carabias Barceló, V. (2012). Coping with a fast-changing world: Towards new systems of future-oriented technology analysis. Science and Public Policy, 39(2), 153-165.

Williamson, I. P. (2001). Land administration “best practice” providing the infrastructure for land policy implementation. Land Use Policy, 18(4), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00021-7

Wolf, M. (2014). The Shifts and the Shocks: What we've Learned–and have Still to Learn–from the Financial Crisis. Penguin UK.

Yousman, B. (2022). Necessary connections: Black Lives Matter, cultural studies, and critical (Race) media literacy. In Critical Race Media Literacy (pp. 156-172). Routledge.

Zaggy, K. J., & Zaggy, K. (2011). Power Branding by WSIU: A Case Study of a Public Television Brand Campaign.