Interdisciplinary approach in educational management science: Theoretical foundations and comparative analysis of the educational management program at the National Academy of Education Management, Vietnam

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijss.v8n4.2451

Authors

  • Le Thi Ngoc Thuy National Academy of Education Management, Vietnam
  • Dang Thu Thuy National Academy of Education Management, Vietnam
  • Pham Ngoc Long National Academy of Education Management, Vietnam
  • Tran Thi Thom National Academy of Education Management, Vietnam
  • Hoang Thi Kim Hue National Academy of Education Management, Vietnam

Keywords:

Educational management science, Interdisciplinary curriculum, Systems thinking, Leadership for learning, Data-driven governance, Improvement science, National Academy of Education Management, Vietnam

Abstract

This study examines the interdisciplinary foundations of educational management science through a qualitative analysis of the undergraduate, master's, and doctoral programs in Educational Management at the National Academy of Education Management (NAEM), Vietnam. Drawing from both international theoretical frameworks and official curricula from 2024 to 2025, the research investigates how interdisciplinary integration is structured across academic levels and how it supports leadership, innovation, and sustainable development in education. The findings reveal that NAEM’s programs form a coherent vertical system based on seven thematic domains: management and leadership, systems science, economics and policy, sociology and organizational culture, improvement science, educational technology and data analytics, and global and transdisciplinary perspectives. The study shows that interdisciplinarity serves as both a theoretical foundation and a strategic framework linking theory, research, and practice in the professional development of educational leaders. The discussion emphasizes that the programs exemplify Mode 2 Knowledge Production (Gibbons et al., 1994), where knowledge emerges through the interaction of academic inquiry, professional practice, and policy contexts. The study concludes with recommendations to strengthen theoretical frameworks, promote interdisciplinary research networks, and expand international collaboration to enhance the global standing of Vietnam’s educational management science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.

Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy and practice. South African journal of education, 27(3), 391-406.

Daniëls, E., Hondeghem, A., & Dochy, F. (2019). A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings. Educational research review, 27, 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.003

Fullan, M. (2020). System change in education. American Journal of Education, 126(4), 653-663.

Gibbons, M., Nowotny, H., & Limoges, C. (1994). The new production of knowledge. Sage.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of educational administration, 49(2), 125-142.

Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126-149.

Hallinger, P. (2020). Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965–2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 209-230.

Hallinger, P., & Kova?evi?, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369.

Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2011). How much do educational outcomes matter in OECD countries?. Economic policy, 26(67), 427-491.

Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2011). The economics of international differences in educational achievement. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 3, 89-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53429-3.00002-8

Harris, K. (2016). Education and knowledge: The structured misrepresentation of reality. Routledge.

Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Wayne state university press.

Ladd, H. F. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement?. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 33(2), 235-261.

Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. (2021). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Sage Publications.

MacBeath, J. (2006). School inspection & self-evaluation: Working with the new relationship. Routledge.

Martins, J., Branco, F., Gonçalves, R., Au-Yong-Oliveira, M., Oliveira, T., Naranjo-Zolotov, M., & Cruz-Jesus, F. (2019). Assessing the success behind the use of education management information systems in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.001

Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in Systems. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Morin, E. (1999). Organization and complexity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 879(1), 115-121.

National Academy of Education Management. (2024). Undergraduate curriculum for the major in Educational Management (Code 7140114). Hanoi: National Academy of Education Management.

National Academy of Education Management. (2025). Master’s curriculum for the major in Educational Management (Code 8140114). Hanoi: National Academy of Education Management.

National Academy of Education Management. (2025). Proposed doctoral curriculum for the major in Educational Management (Code 9140114). Hanoi: National Academy of Education Management.

Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. suny Press.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Education at a glance 2023. OECD Publishing.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Senge, P. M. (2000). Schools that learn: A fieldbook for teachers, administrators, parents and everyone who cares about education. Doubleday.

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. In Rethinking schooling (pp. 208-242). Routledge.

Thoyib, M., Suhifatullah, M. I., Sutarman, S., & Widodo, W. (2021). Learning management in integrating character education. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v4n2.1746

Tsalko, T., Nevmerzhytska, S., Krasniuk, S., Goncharenko, S., & Liubymova, N. (2024). Features, problems and prospects of data mining and data science application in educational management. Bulletin of Science and Education (Series" Philology", Series" Pedagogy", Series" Sociology", Series" Culture and Art", Series" History and Archeology").

Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.

Published

2025-10-18

How to Cite

Thuy, L. T. N., Thuy, D. T., Long, P. N., Thom, T. T., & Hue, H. T. K. (2025). Interdisciplinary approach in educational management science: Theoretical foundations and comparative analysis of the educational management program at the National Academy of Education Management, Vietnam. International Journal of Social Sciences, 8(4), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijss.v8n4.2451