Syntactic study based on character education values essays of fourth grade elementary school student in Bali Province
Keywords:
character education, elementary school, essay, syntaxAbstract
The main purpose of this first-year research is to describe (1) sentence types, (2) unity of sentences, and (3) sentence structure based on character education values contained in essays of fourth-grade elementary school students in the province of Bali. The data source used as the subject in this study was the essay of fourth-grade students in the province of Bali. Meanwhile, the objects of this study are (1) sentence types, (2) unity of sentences, and (3) sentence structure based on character education values contained in essays of fourth-grade elementary school students in the province of Bali. Data was collected by document recording method. Next, the data collected was analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results showed that: (1) the types of sentences contained in the essays of grade IV elementary school students in the province of Bali can be divided based on (a) the number of clauses, there are 804 single sentences, 494 compound sentences, (b) internal structure of the main clause, there are 1209 sentences complete and 89 sentences incomplete.
Downloads
References
Abidin, Y. (2012). Pembelajaran bahasa berbasis pendidikan karakter. Refika Aditama.
Astawa, D. N. W., Lasmawan, I. W., Dantes, N., & Suarni, N. K. (2018). The Effectiveness of the Social Reconstruction Learning Model with Character Education Content for the Deviant Behavior. International research journal of engineering, IT & scientific research, 4(1), 12-21.
Baryadi, I. P. (2007). Urutan Klausa dalam Kalimat Majemuk Subordinatif Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian dari Perspektif Sintaksis dan Wacana. Humaniora, 19(3), 224-231.
Batterink, L., & Neville, H. J. (2013). The human brain processes syntax in the absence of conscious awareness. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(19), 8528-8533.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1990). Penelitian kualitatif untuk pendidikan. Jakarta: Pusat Antar Universitas.
Clifton. Jr, C. E., & Frazier, L. (2010). Imperfect ellipsis: Antecedents beyond syntax?. Syntax, 13(4), 279-297.
Collins, C., & Stabler, E. (2016). A formalization of minimalist syntax. Syntax, 19(1), 43-78.
Cook, W. A. (1978). Introduction to tagmemic analysis. Georgetown Univ School of Language.
Haegeman, L. (2010). The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua, 120(3), 628-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.007
Jiang, J., Bi, P., & Liu, H. (2019). Syntactic complexity development in the writings of EFL learners: Insights from a dependency syntactically-annotated corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100666
Jo, C. W. (2021). Short vs. extended adolescent academic writing: A cross-genre analysis of writing skills in written definitions and persuasive essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101014
Khan, Y. (2010). Pendidikan karakter berbasis potensi diri. Yogyakarta: Pelangi Publishing.
Lanauze, M., & Snow, C. (1989). The relation between first-and second-language writing skills: Evidence from Puerto Rican elementary school children in bilingual programs. Linguistics and education, 1(4), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(89)80005-1
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. sage.
Maimunah, S. (2014). Analisis klausa berdasarkan fungsi, kategori, dan peran pada terjemahan Surah Al-Qaria’ah Ayat 1-11. Jurnal Sintaksis Lanjut.
Mantra, I. B. N. (2017). Promoting primary school teachers’ competence through dynamic interactive workshop and partnership. International Journal of Linguistics, Language and Culture (IJLLC), 3(1), 1-6.
Marinellie, S. A. (2004). Complex syntax used by school-age children with specific language impairment (SLI) in child–adult conversation. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37(6), 517-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.005
Martínez, A. C. L. (2018). Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFL writers at different proficiency levels. Assessing Writing, 35, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.002
Nordquist, R. (2014). English as a foreign language (EFL). Retrieved September, 25.
Osborne, T., Putnam, M., & Groß, T. (2012). Catenae: Introducing a novel unit of syntactic analysis. Syntax, 15(4), 354-396.
Pendidikan, B. S. N. (2006). Standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah: Standar kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar SMA/MA. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Prince, K. C., Ho, E. A., & Hansen, S. B. (2010). Effects of a school based program to improve adaptive school behavior and social competencies among elementary school youth: The living skills program. Journal of Character Education, 8(2), 39.
Putrayasa, I. B. (2008). Tata Kalimat. Aksara. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 32.
Putrayasa, I. B. (2010). Penerapan Model Konstruktivisme Berpendekatan Inkuiri dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 43(1).
Putrayasa, I. B. (2013). Penelusuran Miskonsepsi Dalam Pembelajaran Tata Kalimat Dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Berbasis Inkuiri Pada Siswa Kelas I Smp Laboratorium Undiksha Singaraja. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 2(2).
Putrayasa, I. B. (2014). Kalimat Efektif (Diksi, Struktur, dan Logika) Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Putrayasa, I. B. (2015, September). Pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia (kalimat: unsur objek dan adverbial) dengan model konstruktivisme berpendekatan inkuiri. In Prosiding Seminar Internasional, Malang (pp. 28-29).
Putrayasa, I. B. (2016). Kajian Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. In Makalah Disampaikan dalam Seminar Nasional Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya IV. Denpasar.
Putrayasa, I. B. (2017). Unity and effectiveness of the abstract language beginner lecturer research institution (Undiksha) 2015. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS). V0l, 22, 23-28.
Putrayasa, I. B. (2019). Syntactical analysis of essays. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 156-164.
Putrayasa, I. B., & Atif, N. F. (2009). Jenis kalimat dalam bahasa Indonesia. Refika Aditama.
Putrayasa, I. B., & Novitasari, R. (2012). Tata Kalimat Bahasa Indonesia. Refika Aditama.
Putrayasa, I. B., & Susana, A. (2007). Analisis Kalimat (fungsi, kategori, dan peran). Refika Aditama.
Putrayasa, I. B., Ramendra, D. P., & Aryana, I. B. P. M. (2018). An Analysis of Sentences’ Unity of Students’ Compositions at Grade VI of Elementary Schools in Bali Province. Internationa Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol, 5.
Putrayasa, I. B., Ramendra, D. P., & Aryana, I. B. P. M. (2018, August). The Types of Sentence in the Essays of Grade VI Elementary School Students in Bali Province: A Syntactic Study. In Fourth Prasasti International Seminar on Linguistics (Prasasti 2018).
Putrayasa, I. B., Ramendra, D. P., & Aryana, P. M. (2018, November). The Analysis of Sentences Structure of Students Compositions at Grade VI of Elementary Schools in Bali Province. In International Conference on Language, Literature, and Education (ICLLE 2018) (Vol. 263).
Rapaport, W. J. (1994). Syntactic semantics: Foundations of computational natural-language understanding. In Thinking Computers and Virtual Persons (pp. 225-273). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-215495-9.50015-6
Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Linguistic and cognitive influences on eye movements during reading.
Tai, H. Y. (2015). Writing development in syntactic complexity, accuracy and fluency in a content and language integrated learning class. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 149-156.
Tong, X., & McBride, C. (2017). A reciprocal relationship between syntactic awareness and reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.005
Turan, F., & Ulutas, I. (2016). Using Storybooks as a Character Education Tools. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 169-176.
Westera, W., Dascalu, M., Kurvers, H., Ruseti, S., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2018). Automated essay scoring in applied games: Reducing the teacher bandwidth problem in online training. Computers & Education, 123, 212-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.010
Winch, G., & Johnston, R. R. (Eds.). (2006). Literacy: Reading, writing and children's literature. Oxford University Press, USA.
Zaharija, G., Mladenovi?, S., & Boljat, I. (2013). Introducing basic programming concepts to elementary school children. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 106, 1576-1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.178
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 International journal of linguistics, literature and culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture (IJLLC) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJLLC right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJLLC can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IJLLC volumes 6 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
