Legal liability in standard form of contract

Authors

  • Munnie Yasmin Doctorate Program, Legal Science Program Studies, Udayana University, Jalan P.B. Sudirman, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia

Keywords:

consumer contracts, imbalance position, legal liability, standard form of contract, states liabilities

Abstract

The validity of the standard form of contract is not necessary to be disputed. The standard form of contract has become a business necessity in relation to efficiency and effectiveness. The aspect of problems arising in the standard form of contract is the aspect of the imbalance position of the parties. The standard form of contract is potential to be abused by parties having stronger bargaining power. One of the forms of the imbalance is the inclusion of exemption clauses that aim to limit or release the liability of one of the parties. Currently, the rules governing the exemption clause exists only in the Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection (LCP). Article 18 of LCP governing the standard form of the clause is limited to the extent of prohibited form and content and only aimed at final consumer contracts. In reality, the standard form of the clause is also found in commercial contracts that are not only on final consumers but also midst consumers. Based on this matter, it is necessary to elaborate on the liabilities of the parties and state in drawing up standard form of contacts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Celina, K. S. T. (2008). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Friedmann, W. G. (1971). The State and the Rule of Law in a mixed economy. Stevens.

Fuady, M. (2007). Hukum Kontrak (Dari Sudut Pandangan Bisnis), PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Indonesia, T. R. K. B. B. Pusat Bahasa, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Bahasa $mathsemicolon $ Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2008, 1701 pp.[: Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1988.]. ISBN 978-979-22-3 Sutami Hermina. Wacana, Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia. 2009-oct. CrossRef Google Scholar.

Mulcahy, L. (2008). Contract law in perspective. Routledge-Cavendish.

Patrik, P. (1994). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perikatan. Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Prasetyo, Y. A. (2012). Hak Ekosob dan Kewajiban Negara.

Shidarta, H. P. K. I., & Revisi, E. (2006). Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Subekti, R., & Citrosudibio, R. (1986). Kitab undang-undang hukum perdata: dengan... undang-undang perkahwinan. Pradnya Paramita.

Suherman, E. (1979). Masalah Tanggung Jawab pada Charter Pesawat Udara. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 9(1), 1-28.

Sutedi, A. (2008). Tanggung jawab produk dalam hukum perlindungan konsumen. Ghalia Indonesia.

Sutedi, A. (2010). Hukum rumah susun & apartemen. Sinar Grafika.

Wan, Y. S. (1999). kebebasan berkontrak dan perlindungan yang seimbang bagi para pihak dalam kesepakatan kerja bersama (KKB) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Airlangga).

Widjaya, G., & Yani, A. (2000). Seri Hukum Bisnis: Hukum Abitrase. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Published

2016-09-30

How to Cite

Yasmin, M. (2016). Legal liability in standard form of contract. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 2(9), 51–58. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjeis/article/view/513

Issue

Section

Research Articles