Juridical review on criminal acts of corruption performed by customers in state-owned enterprises

Siti Humulhaer

doi:10.21744/ijss.v5n3.1927

Authors

Siti Humulhaer
shumulhaer@unis.ac.id
Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf, Tangerang, Indonesia

Keywords:

corruption, crime, customers, juridical review

Abstract

This study aims to determine: The application of material criminal law, and for judges' consideration of criminal acts of corruption committed by customers in state-owned enterprises. Qualitative research methods that describe the problems in the Decision. Data collection techniques: Surveys to research sites, literature studies through books, relevant research results, and related laws and regulations. Interviews with related parties and officials. Results: (1). The application of material criminal law to criminal acts of corruption in the decision of Article 18 of the 1999 Corruption Crime Act which has been amended by Law Number 20/2001 junto. Article 55 Paragraph (1) 1st KUHP jo. Article 64 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, is appropriate to be applied because it is carried out jointly. (2). The judge's consideration in the decision, based on the facts of the trial, evidence, and statutory regulations, the judge believes that the defendant abused his authority and harmed the state and could not be justified on the grounds of apologizing. Therefore, the defendant is legally and convincingly guilty of committing a criminal act of corruption that was carried out jointly. So the verdict of the trial judge is very correct.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, Z. (2014). Metode penelitian hukum, cet. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Amiruddin, A. (2012). Analisis Pola Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 8(1).

Anokhin, S., & Schulze, W. S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of business venturing, 24(5), 465-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.06.001

Arsawati, N. N. J. (2016). Legal protection of whistleblower witnesses in revealing corruption after the issue of supreme court circular no. 4 of 2011. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 3(3), 27-33. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/350

Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 25, 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2

Atmasasmita, R. (2016). Tiga paradigma hukum dalam pembangunan nasional. Jurnal Hukum Prioris, 3(1), 1-26.

Bowles, R., & Garoupa, N. (1997). Casual police corruption and the economics of crime. International review of Law and Economics, 17(1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(96)00056-7

Chazawi, A. (2012). Penafsiran dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Grafindo.

Deflem, M. (1995). Corruption, law, and justice: A conceptual clarification. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23(3), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(95)00018-L

Djaja, E. (2010). Memberantas korupsi bersama KPK:(Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi); kajian yuridis normatif UU nomor 31 tahun 1999 juncto UU nomor 20 tahun 2001 versi UU nomor 30 tahun 2002. Sinar Grafika.

Djamali, R. A. (2013). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia.

Effendi, E. (2011). Hukum pidana Indonesia: suatu pengantar. Refika Aditama.

Emmanuel, K. A., Chukwuma, I. O., Ann, O., & Agu, A. O. (2017). Effect of corruption on corporate governance in selected area offices of deposit money banks in Enugu State, Nigeria. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 4(2), 27-47. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/445

Gaviria, A. (2002). Assessing the effects of corruption and crime on firm performance: Evidence from Latin America. Emerging Markets Review, 3(3), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-0141(02)00024-9

Glaeser, E. L., & Saks, R. E. (2006). Corruption in america. Journal of public Economics, 90(6-7), 1053-1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.007

Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). Attribution of blame for criminal acts and its relationship with personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(84)90137-5

Hartanti, E. (2012). Corruption. Rays Graphic: Jakarta.

Kanter, E. Y. (2018). Sianturi. SR Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Penerbit Storia Grafika.

Kugler, M., Verdier, T., & Zenou, Y. (2005). Organized crime, corruption and punishment. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9-10), 1639-1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.005

Lengkong, L. Y. (2017). Penerapan Asas Mencari Kebenaran Materiil pada Perkara Perdata dalam Perspektif Hukum Pembuktian Perdata. to-ra, 3(1), 479-492.

Levitt, S. D., & Miles, T. J. (2007). Empirical study of criminal punishment. Handbook of law and economics, 1, 455-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01007-9

Moeljatno, S. H. (2021). KUHP (Kitab undang-undang hukum pidana). Bumi Aksara.

Pradwipta Brianaji, I., Robertus Bima, W. M., & Ardyanto Imam, W. (2015).Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anggota TNI. Serambi Hukum, 8(02), 23089.

Prasetyo, T. (2015). Hukum Pidana, cetakan keenam. Jakarta: PT RAJAFRAFINDO PERSADA.

Rato, D. (2010). Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami dan Memahami Hukum. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo.

Rose-Ackerman, S. (1975). The economics of corruption. Journal of public economics, 4(2), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(75)90017-1

Soekanto, S. (2004). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum.

Taqiuddin, H. U., & Risdiana, R. (2022). Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) Dalam Praktik Ketatanegaraan. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan), 6(1).

Winanti, A. (2019). Upaya Rehabilitasi Terhadap Pecandu Narkotika Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 10(1).