The effect of the graphic organizer strategy on student's vocabulary building at ITB STIKOM Bali

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v12n1.2592

Authors

  • I Gede Putu Adhitya Prayoga ITB-STIKOM Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Suryasa ITB-STIKOM Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

English learning, Graphic organizer, vocabulary mastery

Abstract

This study aimed to prove whether the use of the Graphic Organizer strategy (GOs) could improve students’ vocabulary building at ITB STIKOM Bali or not. The population of this study was the students in the first semester who were studying English for IT. Through cluster random sampling, the two classes were taken as samples in this study. They were assigned as experimental group and the control group by lottery. To obtain the required data, the two groups received different treatments. The experimental group was taught by using the Graphic Organizer strategy (GOs), while the control group was taught by using a conventional technique. The instruments used to collect the data in this study were a pretest, a posttest, and a teaching scenario. After analyzing the result was found that there was a significant difference between students’ vocabulary building at students who were taught using the GO strategy and those who were taught using the conventional vocabulary. The findings revealed that None (0%) of the students in the experimental group scored less than 10, while in the control group, there were 6 (17,6%) students who got a score less than ten.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Castro-Delgado, M. A., Cedeño-Rivadeneira, L. L., Félix-García, J. C., Rivera-Mendoza, K. J., & Vinueza-Segovia, A. J. (2024). Learning styles in the English Language teaching process in educational units: Case study. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 10(3), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v10n3.2430

Clark, A. (2007). GOs and the school library program. University of Alberta Department of Elementary Education.

Colliot, T., & Jamet, É. (2018). Does self-generating a graphic organizer while reading improve students' learning?. Computers & Education, 126, 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.028

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1990). How to design and evaluate research in education. Order Department, McGraw Hill Publishing Co., Princeton Rd., Hightstown, NJ 08520.

Moir, J., & Nation, P. (2008). Vocabulary and Good Language Learner: Lessonsfrom Good Language Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nilforoushan, S. (2012). The Effect of Teaching Vocabulary through Semantic Mapping on EFL Learners' Awareness of the Affective Dimensions of Deep Vocabulary Knowledge. English Language Teaching, 5(10), 164-172.

Sarica, G. N., & Cavus, N. (2009). New trends in 21st Century English learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 439-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.079

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. Pearson Education.

Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting Educational Research. Orlando: Harcourt Brace College Publisher.

Zaghlool, Z. D. (2004). The Effect of an Instructional Programme Based on Semantic Strategies on the Learning of Lexical Items by Jordanian Secondary Stage Students. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation. Amman Arab University for Graduate Studies.

Zahedi, Y., & Abdi, M. (2012). The impact of imagery strategy on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 2264-2272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.197

Zaini, S. H., Mokhtar, S. Z., & Nawawi, M. (2010). The effect of graphic organizer on students’ learning in school. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 17-23.

Published

2026-01-23

How to Cite

Prayoga, I. G. P. A., & Suryasa, I. W. (2026). The effect of the graphic organizer strategy on student’s vocabulary building at ITB STIKOM Bali. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 12(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v12n1.2592

Issue

Section

Research Articles