Stakeholder pressure and manufacturing firm profitability: The mediation effect of environmental performance
Keywords:
Environmental Performance, Profitability, Stakeholder PressureAbstract
This study aims to examine the role of environmental performance in mediating the effect of stakeholder pressure on corporate profitability, with firm size as a control variable. Stakeholder theory is employed as the grand theory, while legitimacy theory serves as the supporting theory. This research was conducted on manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2019 to 2023. The sample was determined using a purposive sampling technique, resulting in 922 observation data. Data collection was carried out through non-participant observation by downloading data from the companies’ official websites and the IDX website. The analytical technique used was Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis, employing the WarpPLS program. The findings indicate that environmental pressure, customer pressure, and investor pressure have a positive effect on a company’s environmental performance, whereas employee pressure has a negative effect. Furthermore, environmental pressure, customer pressure, and employee pressure have a positive effect on corporate profitability. In addition, environmental performance can mediate the effect of environmental pressure, customer pressure, and employee pressure on the profitability of manufacturing companies.
Downloads
References
Alam, S. S., & Islam, K. Z. (2021). Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 6(1), 8.
Alfaiz, D. R., & Aryati, T. (2019). Pengaruh Tekanan Stakeholder Dan Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Kualitas Sustainability Report Dengan Komite Audit Sebagai Variabel Moderasi3. Methosika: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Methodist, 2(2), 112-130.
Alharbi, K. M., Elshamly, A., & Mahgoub, I. G. (2025). Do Regulatory Pressures and Stakeholder Expectations Drive CSR Adherence in the Chemical Industry?. Sustainability, 17(5), 2128.
Baah, C., Jin, Z., & Tang, L. (2020). Organizational and regulatory stakeholder pressures friends or foes to green logistics practices and financial performance: investigating corporate reputation as a missing link. Journal of cleaner production, 247, 119125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119125
Baah, C., Opoku-Agyeman, D., Acquah, I. S. K., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Faibil, D., & Abdoulaye, F. A. M. (2021). Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.015
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?. Administrative science quarterly, 55(1), 82-113.
Block, J. H., Sharma, P., & Benz, L. (2024). Stakeholder Pressures and Decarbonization Strategies in Mittelstand Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 193(3), 511–533.
Bordean, O. N., & Welsh, K. (2023a). The interplay of strategy, corporate social responsibility and customer orientation in explaining firm performance: a stakeholder view. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 36(3).
Cao, Y. (2023). ESG, Brand Trust and Brand Loyalty. Communications in Humanities Research, 22(1), 183–189.
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Singh, R. (2019). The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and financial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 212, 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.011
Chandra, A. (2009). Pentingnya Perusahaan Mengelola Hubungan Baik Dan Fungsional Dengan Pemangku Kepentingan. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Unpar, 5(2), 75–92.
Chang, C. H., Lin, H. W., Tsai, W. H., Wang, W. L., & Huang, C. T. (2021). Employee satisfaction, corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(18).
Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Financial Outcomes: Analyzing the Impact of ESG on Financial Performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345.
Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). The Determinants of Green Product Development Performance: Green Dynamic Capabilities, Green Transformational Leadership, and Green Creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 107–119.
Cho, C. K., Cho, T. S., & Lee, J. (2019). Managerial attributes, consumer proximity, and corporate environmental performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 159–169.
Chuang, S. P., & Yang, C. L. (2014). Key success factors when implementing a green-manufacturing system. Production Planning and Control, 25(11), 923–937.
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of accounting and public policy, 30(2), 122-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.013
D’Angelo, V., Cappa, F., & Peruffo, E. (2023). Green manufacturing for sustainable development: The positive effects of green activities, green investments, and non-green products on economic performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1900–1913.
De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. (2015). Structural and relational interdependence and entrepreneurial orientation in small and medium-sized enterprises: The mediating role of internal knowledge-sharing. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 33(5), 514–536.
Delmas, M. (2007). The Adoption of ISO 14001 Within the Supply Chain When Are Customer Pressures Effective? Institute for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research.
Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic management journal, 29(10), 1027-1055.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48(2), 147-160.
Evita, M., & Syafruddin, S. (2019). Pengaruh Biaya Lingkungan, Kinerja Lingkungan, Dan Iso 14001 Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Pertambangan Studi Kasus Pada Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-2017. Measurement Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(1), 27-35.
Faliza, N. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan (CSR) dan Keunggulan Bersaing. J-MIND (Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia), 6(1), 29-39.
Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports within the GRI Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53–63.
Freeman, R. B. (1984). Longitudinal analyses of the effects of trade unions. Journal of labor Economics, 2(1), 1-26.
Fujii, H., Iwata, K., Kaneko, S., & Managi, S. (2013). Corporate Environmental and Economic Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Study for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 187–201.
Glaveli, N. (2020). Corporate social responsibility toward stakeholders and customer loyalty: investigating the roles of trust and customer identification with the company. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(3), 367–383.
Hermawan, A. N., Masudin, I., Zulfikarijah, F., Restuputri, D. P., & Shariff, S. S. R. (2024). The effect of sustainable manufacturing on environmental performance through government regulation and eco-innovation. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 6(4), 299–325.
Hermundsdottir, F., & Aspelund, A. (2022). Competitive sustainable manufacturing-Sustainability strategies, environmental and social innovations, and their effects on firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 370, 133474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133474
Huang, J. W., & Li, Y. H. (2017). Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. Journal of business ethics, 145(2), 309-324.
Iriyanto, F. N., & Nugroho, P. I. (2014). Pengaruh Kinerja Lingkungan terhadap Praktik Pengungkapan Sustainability Report dan Kinerja Ekonomi. Paper Knowledge. Toward a Media History of Documents, 3(1), 46–57.
Iwata, H., & Okada, K. (2011). How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1691-1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.010
Jin, H., Li, X., & Li, G. (2024). Impact of corporate social responsibility on employee loyalty: Mediating role of person-organization fit and employee trust. Plos one, 19(3), e0300933.
Kordsachia, O., Focke, M., & Velte, P. (2022). Do sustainable institutional investors contribute to firms’ environmental performance? Empirical evidence from Europe. Review of Managerial Science, 16(5), 1409-1436.
Kristiani, L. A., & Werastuti, D. N. S. (2020). Pengaruh Kinerja Lingkungan Dan Kinerja Sosial Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Dengan Good Corporate Governance Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha, 11(3), 499-508.
Lee, M. T., & Raschke, R. L. (2023). Stakeholder legitimacy in firm greening and financial performance: What about greenwashing temptations? Journal of Business Research, 155.
Li, D., Zheng, M., Cao, C., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Huang, M. (2017). The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100. Journal of cleaner production, 141, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123
Lina, L., Adam, M., Widiyanti, M., & Isnurhadi, I. (2024). The influence of Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) on the financial performance of banking companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI). International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 7(2), 112-118. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijbem.v7n2.2286
Mihail, B. A., Dumitrescu, D., Serban, D., Micu, C. D., & Lobda, A. (2021). The Role of Investor Relations and Good Corporate Governance on Firm Performance in the Case of the Companies Listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12).
Miranda-Guerra, M., Cevallos, S., & Torres, K. D. (2024). Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty: A Quantitative Analysis in the Retail Sector. IBIMA Business Review.
Ogunbukola, M. (2024). Sustainable Business Practices and Profitability: Balancing Environmental Responsibility with Financial Performance. ResearchGate.
Pacheco, D. F., Dean, T. J., & Payne, D. S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of economic perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
Ramadhanty Nauval, R., Kuspriyono, T., Hakim, L., Agustina Yanti, V., Bina Sarana Informatika, U., Kunci, K., & Perusahaan, N. (2024). Pengaruh Leverage dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Ekonomi & Manajemen Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, 22(2).
Ratnasari, Y. (2011). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap Luas Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Di Dalam Sustainability Report. Skripsi Universitas Diponegoro, 1–89.
Rosyid, A. (2015). Pengaruh Kinerja Sosial Dan Kinerja Lingkungan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. Jurnal Penelitian, 12(1), 72-85.
Rudyanto, A., & Veronica Siregar, S. (2018). The effect of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance on the sustainability report quality. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(2), 233-249.
Rueda-Manzanares, A., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2008). The influence of stakeholders on the environmental strategy of service firms: The moderating effects of complexity, uncertainty and munificence. British Journal of Management, 19(2), 185–203.
Ruiz-Blanco, S., Romero, S., & Fernandez-Feijoo, B. (2022). Green, blue or black, but washing–What company characteristics determine greenwashing? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(3), 4024–4045.
Sakai, R. (2022). The Evolution of Investor Activism in Japan. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00640.
Saleem, F., Zhang-Zhang, Y., Malik, M. I., & Allui, A. (2020). Revisiting stakeholder theory and environmentalism: Evidence from an emerging economy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 1–20.
Sari, C. W., Sudana, I. P., Ratnadi, N. M. D., & Rasmini, N. K. (2022). Stakeholder pressure and environmental performance of manufacturing companies on the Indonesian stock exchange. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(on), 893-903.
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., & Adenso-Diaz, B. (2010). Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001
Septavianty, D. A. (2022). Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan, Tekanan Stakeholder terhadap Kualitas Sustainability Report melalui Kinerja Keuangan. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 11(9).
Setyaningrum, R. P. (2022). Achieving employee environmental performance through perceived organizational support towards the environment: a mediated-moderation analysis. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 17–30.
Sriningsih, S., & Wahyuningrum, I. F. S. (2022). Pengaruh Comprehensive Stakeholder Pressure dan Good Corporate Governance terhadap Kualitas Sustainability Report. Owner, 6(1), 813–827.
Tantawi, R., & Noviana, A. H. (2024). Employee Green Behavior’s Impact on Sustainable Environmental Performance: Exploring The Mediating-Moderating Roles of Perceived Organizational Support and Self-Efficacy.
Tarigan, J., & Semuel, H. (2015). Pengungkapan Sustainability Report dan Kinerja Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 16(2), 88–101.
Wang, Q., Shi, R., Zhang, F., Wang, X., & Gao, Y. (2022). How organizational psychological ownership affects corporate green operations - Based on a social exchange theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
Weng, H. H. R., Chen, J. S., & Chen, P. C. (2015). Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: A stakeholder perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(5), 4997–5026.
Wicaksono, S. L. (2012). Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Kinerja Lingkungan (Studi Pada Perusahaan PROPER Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia). 1–65.
Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of business research, 101, 697-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.010
Yunus, S., Elijido-Ten, E. O., & Abhayawansa, S. (2020). Impact of stakeholder pressure on the adoption of carbon management strategies: Evidence from Australia. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(7), 1189–1212.
Zainab, A., & Burhany, D. I. (2020). Biaya Lingkungan, Kinerja Lingkungan, dan Kinerja Keuangan pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar, 11(1), 992–998.
Zhang, Z., & Zhang, L. (2024). Investor attention and corporate ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 60.
Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Lee, S. H., & Chen, L. B. (2011). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Organizational Learning, and Performance: Evidence From China. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(2), 293–317.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 International journal of business, economics and management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of Business, Economics & Management (IJBEM) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJBEM right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IJBEM can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.








