The effectiveness of the problem solving method on learning outcomes of the English course for room division operation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Authors

  • I Nyoman Kanca Politeknik Negeri Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Gede Ginaya Politeknik Negeri Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Ni Nyoman Sri Astuti Politeknik Negeri Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n1.1102

Keywords:

COVID-19, English learning outcomes, pandemic, problem solving, room division course

Abstract

This study aims to determine how much effective problem-solving methods are in the third semester of English learning outcomes in the Hospitality Study Program, Tourism Department, Bali State Polytechnic during the Covid-19 pandemic. The background in this study is the lack of student enjoyment in English, inappropriate learning strategies, and the lack of developing student creativity in the learning process. This type of research is quantitative research. Data collection techniques using observation, tests, and documentation. Participants consisted of 60 (29 male and 31 female) third-semester students of the Diploma 3 Program, Hospitality, Bali State Polytechnic, 2020/2021 academic year. The data were collected through a classroom action-based research procedure starting from planning, acting, observing, and reflecting. Through the quasi-experimental design, the collected data were analyzed using paired t-tests and mixed design ANCOVA to identify any significant improvement after the administration of the action. Furthermore, the qualitative data were analyzed based on the results of observations during the giving of the action and the results of the questionnaire.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and instruction, 20(6), 533-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001

Ballin, L., Balandin, S., Stancliffe, R. J., & Togher, L. (2011). Speech-language pathologists' views on mentoring by people who use speech generating devices. International journal of speech-language pathology, 13(5), 446-457.

Cresswell, J. (2014). Research design. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.

Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language learning & technology, 7(3), 50-80.

Ginaya, G. (2018). The Balinese calendar system: From its epistemological perspective to axiological practices. International journal of linguistics, literature and culture, 4(3), 24-37.

Ginaya, G., Aryana, I. N. R., & Somawati, N. P. (2018). Improving Students' Speaking Ability through Scaffolding Technique. Soshum: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 8(1), 72-85.

Ginaya, G., Rejeki, I. N. M., & Astuti, N. N. S. (2018). The effects of blended learning to students’ speaking ability. International journal of linguistics, literature and culture, 4(3), 1-14.

Holešinská, A. (2006). Teaching English as a foreign language to students with learning difficulties (Doctoral dissertation, Masarykova univerzita, Pedagogická fakulta).

Kemmis, S., & Taggart, R. (1988). The Action Planner (Geelong, Deakin University Press).

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2013). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer Science & Business Media.

Laborda, JG (2009). Using webquests for oral communication in English as a foreign language for Tourism Studies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society , 12 (1), 258-270.

Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023

McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2012). Materials and Methods in ELT. John Wiley & Sons.

Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Learning outcomes and students' perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.03.006

Nezu, A. M. (2004). Problem solving and behavior therapy revisited. Behavior therapy, 35(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80002-9

Nutting, C. M. (2013). Discovery-Based Learning in World Arts: Creativity and Collaboration in the Undergraduate Fine Arts Class. Teaching Innovation Projects, 3(1).

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge university press.

Saumell, V. (2012). Guided Discovery for Language Instruction: A Framework for Implementation at All Levels. Buenos Aires: Person.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

Thorsett, P. (2002). Discovery learning theory. Retrieved May, 28, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-23

How to Cite

Kanca, I. N., Ginaya, G., & Sri Astuti, N. N. (2020). The effectiveness of the problem solving method on learning outcomes of the English course for room division operation during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 7(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v7n1.1102

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)