Bureaucracy conflicts in border areas: study on conflict between civilian state apparatus and regent in morotai island regency
Keywords:
conflict, political will, regional head, state civil apparatusAbstract
Regional bureaucratic conflicts are often caused by regional heads' failure to express the concept of regional bureaucratic development and appear to be political, followed by the regional authorities' egocentrism, causing conflicts for the provincial government's technical implementers (in this case, Civilian State Apparatus. This series of matches has drained energy, costs, and energy for Civilian State Apparatus has been highlighted so that the spirit of bureaucratic reform is highlighted not running optimally. The results of the study show that the conflict begins with the regional head's policy regarding a system of rotation/transfer of positions that are not based on employment regulations, the application of immeasurable reward and punishment, the obligation to take credit, buy a house, and buy a vehicle for state civil apparatus with guaranteed Regional Performance Allowances. Following the position (not having a legal basis) Decree of Promotion for state civil apparatus as much as 611 (3 (three periods of promotion) and the imposition of sanctions for the Acting Regional Secretary of Morotai Island Regency in the form of a Warning Letter for not receiving allowances until an unspecified time limit.
Downloads
References
Aslan. (2019, January 17). Pergeseran Nilai Di Masyarakat Perbatasan (Studi tentang Pendidikan dan Perubahan Sosial di Desa Temajuk Kalimantan Barat) [Disertasi dipublikasikan]. Pasca Sarjana. https://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/10997/
Barua, M., Bhagwat, S. A., & Jadhav, S. (2013). The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biological Conservation, 157, 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.014
Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods For The Social Sciences. Allyn and bacon.
Cassell, C., Cunliffe, A. L., & Grandy, G. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods: History and Traditions. SAGE.
Dalimunthe, S. F. (2016). Manajemen konflik dalam organisasi. Jurnal Bahas Unimed, 27(1), 78255.
Fisher, S., Matovic, V., Ludin, J., Abdi, D. I., Walker, B. A., Smith, R., Mathews, D., Williams, S., & Williams, S. (2000). Working with Conflict 2: Skills and Strategies for Action. Zed Books.
Giessen, L., Krott, M., & Möllmann, T. (2014). Increasing representation of states by utilitarian as compared to environmental bureaucracies in international forest and forest–environmental policy negotiations. Forest Policy and Economics, 38, 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.08.008
Hedges, J. (2002). The importance of posting and interaction with the education bureaucracy in becoming a teacher in Ghana. International journal of educational development, 22(3-4), 353-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(01)00057-8
Flick, U. (2013). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. Sage.
Heridiansyah, J. (2014). Manajemen konflik dalam sebuah organisasi. Jurnal STIE Semarang (Edisi Elektronik), 6(1), 28–41.
Meleong, L. J. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muspawi, M. (2014). Manajemen konflik (upaya penyelesaian konflik dalam organisasi). Jambi University.
Roth, K., & Nigh, D. (1992). The effectiveness of headquarters-subsidiary relationships: The role of coordination, control, and conflict. Journal of Business Research, 25(4), 277-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(92)90025-7
Sahide, M. A. K., & Giessen, L. (2015). The fragmented land use administration in Indonesia–Analysing bureaucratic responsibilities influencing tropical rainforest transformation systems. Land Use Policy, 43, 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.005
Sopandi, D. (2019). The Expenditure Process of the State Budget (APBN) Funds with the State Treasury and Budget (SPAN) System in the Perspective of Bureaucratic Reform: Case Study at State Treasury Service Office Denpasar. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 5(6), 12-17.
Suryanata, I. G. N. P., & Pemayun, A. G. P. (2018). Contribution of business society credit increasing for society income. International research journal of management, IT and social sciences, 5(4), 71-79.
Willig, C., & Rogers, W. S. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology. Sage.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2021 International research journal of management, IT and social sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social sciences (IRJMIS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IRJMIS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IRJMIS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IRJMIS volumes 7 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
