Development of mathematical skills at the cognitive level of basic general education students
Keywords:
basic education, cognitive level, learning, mathematical skills, studentsAbstract
The objective of the research was to evaluate the development of mathematical skills at the cognitive level of Basic General Education students of the Magaly Masson de Valle Carrera Educational Unit in the 2022, that in view of the learning results of the students and that according to national evaluations, the students did not reach the established average according to the evaluations carried out in Ecuador, they present a low cognitive level and a limited development of mathematical skills, for reasons of teacher training in technological and virtual tools, connectivity and the accompaniment of a significant adult at home. In the study, the theory of cognitive development is proposed, who explains how these are developed in the child and how their contribution helps to solve problems, which configure logical connections for the understanding of life situations. The level of the investigation was descriptive and explanatory; the quantitative approach, using scientific, inductive, deductive, analytical, synthetic, and statistical methods. The result was no relationship of mathematical skills in proportion to the cognitive level, in addition to the development of skills in children who had synchronous connectivity was high, who do not accept the virtual class system.
Downloads
References
Alloway, T. P., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2011). The relationship between working memory, IQ, and mathematical skills in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 133-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.013
Alvarez, M. E. (2000). Salicylic acid in the machinery of hypersensitive cell death and disease resistance. Programmed cell death in higher plants, 185-198.
Arip, M., Cembun, .-., & Emilyani, D. (2018). Strategy to improve knowledge, attitude, and skill toward clean and healthy life behaviour. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(3), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n3.222
Ballestero, MM (2008). Education Magazine.
Beiter, R., Nash, R., McCrady, M., Rhoades, D., Linscomb, M., Clarahan, M., & Sammut, S. (2015). The prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, and stress in a sample of college students. Journal of affective disorders, 173, 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.054
Bohlmann, N. L., & Weinstein, R. S. (2013). Classroom context, teacher expectations, and cognitive level: Predicting children's math ability judgments. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 34(6), 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.06.003
Bruner, J. (2010). What psychology should study.
Bustios. (2017). Levels of cognitive learning programmed and evaluated by the professors of the academic-professional schools of obstetrics of the universities.
Castro, S. (2018). Diagnosis of the level of development of the logical operations of classification, seriation and notion of number.
CONSTANTE, S. (JUNE 15, 2020). Ecuador: online education from home is impossible and unfair. THE COUNTRY.
Gardey, J.P. (2008). Definition of cognitive.
Garg, A. X., Norman, G., & Sperotable, L. (2001). How medical students learn spatial anatomy. The lancet, 357(9253), 363-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03649-7
Hernández, F. &. (2000). Investigation methodology.
Hernández. (2003). Migrations to PANDO.
Iivari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life–How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care?. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183
INEVAL & OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 general report.
Juliegarfias. (2015). Juliegarfias.
JUNGLE, MT (2018). Mexican Journal of Educational Research.
Korucu, A. T., & Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1925-1930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.029
LÓPEZ, E. (2011). Webschool.
McGill, M. E., Slocum Jr, J. W., & Lei, D. (1992). Management practices in learning organizations. Organizational dynamics, 21(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(92)90082-X
Merkley, R., & Ansari, D. (2016). Why numerical symbols count in the development of mathematical skills: Evidence from brain and behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.006
MIEDUC. (August 17, 2020). EDUCATIONAL PLAN Section 3: Math skills
Ministry of Education of Ecuador. (December 13, 2019). Ecuador participated in PISA-D in 2017. Obtained from: Obtained from the Ministry of Education of Ecuador: https://educacion.gob.ec/ecuador-participo-en-pisa-d-en-2017/
PALTAN, G. (2011). Repository of the University of Cuenca.
Rico. (2004). Mathematics in the cognitive and metacognitive development of primary school children. Edusol.
Rímoli, R. (December 10, 2020). The Birth of the Game in the Child, According to Jean Piaget (1896-1980).
Rodríguez Arocho, WC (1999). The legacy of Vygotsky and Piaget to education. Latin American Journal of Psychology.
Sampieri, R.H. (2010). Investigation methodology.
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and instruction, 13(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
Shahiri, A. M., & Husain, W. (2015). A review on predicting student's performance using data mining techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 414-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.157
UNAD. (2016). UNAD repository. Obtained from Study of the factors that influence the disinterest and apathy of elementary school students towards mathematics: https://repository.unad.edu.co/handle/10596/40158
Universidad Santo Tomás. (2020). University Santo Tomas. Obtained from what are pedagogical strategies?: http://soda.ustadistancia.edu.co/enlinea/mariachaleladidacticasyestrategiasenelaula_mariachalela/qu_son_las_estrategias_pedaggicas.html
Vasquez, F. (2010). Teaching strategies: research on didactics in educational institutions in the city of Pasto. Bogota DC: Kimpres.
Widiartini, N. K., & Sudirtha, I. G. (2019). Effect of KWL learning method (know-want-learn) and self-assessment on student learning independence vocational high school. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n2.331
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 International research journal of management, IT and social sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social sciences (IRJMIS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IRJMIS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IRJMIS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IRJMIS volumes 7 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.