Enforcement of justice in minor crimes for the establishment of law and order in Indonesia
Keywords:
law enforcement, criminal offenses, minor criminal offenses, restorative justiceAbstract
Since crime was known in society, criminal law experts from ancient times initially considered punishment as a means of treatment (remedy) to cure perpetrators of criminal acts by giving sanctions that have a deterrent effect, so that criminals no longer repeat their actions, including for minor criminal cases. The research was conducted using the Normative Juridical research method with literature studies, with the formulation of the problem to be raised, namely (1) How is the Law Enforcement of Minor Criminal Offenses Based on Restorative Justice in Order to Create Order in the Criminal Law and Sentencing System, and a Comparison of the Legal Basis in Indonesia with the United States and Singapore? and (2) What is the Ideal Concept of Law Enforcement of Minor Criminal Offenses Based on Restorative Justice Based on Progressive Legal Theory that is Expected in the Future (Ius Constituendum)?, and it is concluded, Firstly that the enforcement of minor criminal law with Restorative Justice in order to create order in the Criminal Law and Punishment System in Indonesia still has dualism in its law enforcement by law enforcers,,,
Downloads
References
Amiruddin, A. Z. (2006). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Cet. Ke-1.
Anshori, A. G. (2016). Filsafat Hukum Sejarah, Aliran dan Pemaknaan, Yogjakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Arief Sidharta, B. (2000). Refleksi Tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum. Sebuah Penelitian tentang fundasi kefilsafatan dan sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum sebagi Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia, Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Candra, S. (2013). Restorative Justice: suatu tinjauan terhadap pembaharuan hukum pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2(2), 263-277.
Custers, B., & Vergouw, B. (2015). Promising policing technologies: Experiences, obstacles and police needs regarding law enforcement technologies. Computer Law & Security Review, 31(4), 518-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.05.005
Daliyo, J. B. (1992). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Huijbers, T. (1995). Filsafat Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah, cet. VIII, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Kuo, S. Y., Longmire, D., & Cuvelier, S. J. (2010). An empirical assessment of the process of restorative justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(3), 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.03.006
Manan, B. (2008). Retorative Justice (Suatu Perkenalan), dalam Refleksi Dinamika Hukum Rangkaian Pemikiran dalam dekade Terakhir. Jakarta: Perum Percetakan Negara RI.
Marzuki, M. (2017). Penelitian hukum: Edisi revisi. Prenada Media.
Morris, A., & Maxwel, G. (2001). Restorative Justice for Junvile; Coferencing. Mediation and Cirlce.Morris, A., & Maxwel, G. (2001). Restorative Justice for Junvile; Coferencing. Mediation and Cirlce.
Notonegoro. (1971). Pancasila Dasar Falsafah Negara, Jakarta: Pancuran Tujuh.
Rahardjo, S. (1996). Hukum dalam Perspektif Sejarah dan Perubahan Sosial dalam Pembangunan Hukum dalam Perspektif Politik Hukum Nasional. Rajawali. Jakarta.
Raharjo, S. (2010). Legal Theory from Various Spaces and Generations.
Rizkiah, N. (2021). Bahan Kuliah Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Bogor: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Darma Andiga.
Saleh, R. (1979). Mengadili sebagai pergulatan kemanusiaan. Akasara Baru.
Satsumi, Y., Inada, T., & Yamauchi, T. (1998). Criminal offenses among discharged mentally ill individuals: Determinants of the duration from discharge and absence of diagnostic specificity. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 21(2), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2527(98)00012-0
Sibuea, H. P. (2001). Pancasila Sebagai Cita Hukum dan hubungannya dengan Fungsi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat serta Citra Hukum (Undang-undang) yang Berdasarkan Pancasila, Makalah, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta.
Sirait, T. M. (2016). Urgensi perluasan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi sebagai manifestasi pengejawantahan konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(3), 575-596.
Sirait, T. M. (2017). The Implementation of Procedural Law of Responsibility Enforcement of Corporate Crime in Integrated Criminal Justice System. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 17(3), 342-349.
Sirait, T. M. (2021). Hukum Pidana Khusus Dalam Teori Dan Penegakannya. Deepublish.
Sirait, T. M. (2022). The Global Criminal Law Enforcement Policy on False Information Bomb Hoax. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 25, 1.
Sirait, T. M. (2022). The Paid Criminal Legal Policy as a New Paradigm of Criminalization during the Global Pandemic. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 25, 1.
Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat.
Soekanto, S. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum.
Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: PT. Raja Graflndo Persada, 2008.
Soesilo, R. (1991). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar- Komentarnya, Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Bogor: Politeia.
Syukur, F. A. (2011). Mediasi perkara KDRT (kekerasan dalam rumah tangga): teori dan praktek di pengadilan Indonesia. Mandar Maju.
Wolthuis, A., Claessen, J., Slump, G. J., & Van Hoek, A. (2019). Dutch developments: restorative justice in legislation and in practice. Int'l J. Restorative Just., 2, 118.
Zulfa, E. A. (2011). Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan, cet. 1, Bandung: CV Lubuk Agung, Ketua Majelis.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 International research journal of management, IT and social sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social sciences (IRJMIS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IRJMIS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IRJMIS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IRJMIS volumes 7 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.










